Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 11 March 13 >

March 12 edit

Template:Heads of State of Ireland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox covered by {{Presidents of Ireland}}. Nigej (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment what about the Irish Free State? That isn't covered by the suggested replacement, which only covers the Republic of Ireland. (Both templates also ignores all the heads of state prior to home rule during the Union, and the high kings prior to the union.) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In some ways the {{Governor-General of the Irish Free State}} are more related to the Presidents than, say, George VI. Are George VI and Douglas Hyde really "related"? Navboxes work best when the entries are closely related. Nigej (talk) 06:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, it could be rewritten, to replace the kings with the GGs for that period. And then add the missing high kings for the period before being annexed. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Still unused except in old talk archives. We don't need to engage in crazy scheming to find uses for unused templates; just leave them to their fate. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 American Samoa Winter Olympic team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary. Only one athlete competed for the country. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the chef de mission of the team. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which is a red link. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Being use for decorative purposes rather than being any use for navigation, per WP:NAVBOX Nigej (talk) 06:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete For the reasons presented above. Nimrodbr (talk) 08:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nigej....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lechmere (MBTA station) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Not needed in the relevant article, as the tracks shown have been closed and replaced. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fake block edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Johnuniq (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Redundant to other user block templates. Userfy if the creator wants to keep it for some misleading personal use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was looking for something and noticed this. The author blanked the template which I took to be a request to delete it. Would someone please attend to the paperwork here. Johnuniq (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    well, you were correct, that's a request to delete it. Scratchinghead (talk) 08:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wiki Loves Women - Monthly Contest edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and covered by the similarly named {{Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest}}. Not clear we need either but we certainly don't need both. Nigej (talk) 07:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Regarding how often {{Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest}} can be found on user pages I don't understand the word "either" in your deletion request. I don't know either how "we" is. --Gereon K. (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The other could be substituted in the user pages and then deleted (although that would probably need a separate TfD). "we" = English language Wikipedia. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tropical cyclone edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use sidebar from 2007, which duplicates {{Tropicalcyclone}} (no space). Could delete or perhaps move the other one here as being a better name. Nigej (talk) 07:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:West-Midlands-Metro-Edgbaston edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{West-Midlands-Metro-Line-One}} which also covers the "2022" extensions. Nigej (talk) 08:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-takeover edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Little used duplicate of {{Uw-hijacking}}. The documentation mentions "hijacking" so I can't see any distinguishing feature of this. Nigej (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-vremoval edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User warning from 2009. Seems to have been unused. Nigej (talk) 09:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-dttr2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 19. ✗plicit 12:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Drum Corps International Defunct & Inactive corps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Either delete or merge with Template:DCI Nav. Not a useful template either, since most of the individual pages themselves have been merged together. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Drum Corps International Open Class corps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merged with Template:DCI Nav; Not used on any pages. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Drum Corps International World Class corps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merged with Template:DCI Nav; Not used on any page. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sodor Railways edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article on this fictional railway (North Western Railway (fictional)) was WP:BLARed as a result of this Afd: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Western Railway (fictional), leaving this template unused. Many of the blue links have been BLARed too. Nigej (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southport and Cheshire Lines Extension Railway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused railway route-map covered by and {{Southport & Cheshire Lines Extension Railway}} ("&" for "and") and {{North Liverpool Extension Line}}. Nigej (talk) 13:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scotland opentask edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Has said "No current tasks" since 2008. Presumably related to WP:SCOTLAND, but clearly unused. Nigej (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/SpaceX Starship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An odd boutique editnotice that asks users not to add trivial material to the article. This could apply to just about any article on a popular subject, and it doesn't seem to be a particular problem with this article (nearly all of the recent edits to this article are by the same user who created the editnotice). Spicy (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A few months passed by and I see no improvement to new user's edits. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Albinegros de Orizaba squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no need for a current squad template as team is dissolved Joeykai (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Altamira squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no need for a current squad template as team is defunct Joeykai (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atletico Mexiquense squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no need for a current squad template as Atletico Mexiquense restructured to a reserve team Joeykai (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_12&oldid=1078051908"