Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 19

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 18 January 20 >

January 19 edit

Template:Orlen Wisła Płock squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated Polish handball team navboxes. Better to have the list of current players listed on the mainspaces as they are and would most likely fail NENAN for the limited number of articles for the players. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Unused. As noted, squads are best maintained in the parent articles and these provide no useful navigational benefit, even if used and updated. Nigej (talk) 06:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Richmond Football Club (reserves) current squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated team template used on the wrong space. There is no way that the current template reflects the squad from the 2016 to 2021 seasons for the Richmond team. This is not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Papua New Guinea Hunters 2019 squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused malformed template that already has a squad list in table format on the 2019 season article for the team. This is not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FK Mogren Budva squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of these squad navboxes for football/squad teams are outdated and unused. The mainspaces for these teams roster section has more redlinks than existing articles and updating them to reflect such lists would fail NENAN. The Syracuse Silver Knights haven't been the Knights since the end of the 2017-2018 season. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. All playing at levels where current squads are not useful. FK Mogren Budva - "was relegated to the lowest-rank competition of football in Montenegro", Hacettepe S.K. - according to the template there, they're in the TFF Second League and we don't even have an article for the current season 2021–22 TFF Second League. Lota Schwager a Chilean professional team "currently play in Tercera A (fourth-tier)." Again not an article for the season. Syracuse Silver Knights playing in the Major Arena Soccer League where current squads are not generally maintained, see Category:Major Arena Soccer League templates. Nigej (talk) 07:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 'FK Mogren Budva squad' as team is defunct so no current squad; and 'Hacettepe SK squad' as team plays at low level with insufficient blue links to no need for navbox. GiantSnowman 21:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 'Lota Schwager squad' as simply needs updating to reflect Lota Schwager#Current squad which has 7 blue links and justifies a navbox; and 'Syracuse Silver Knights' for same reason, to reflect Utica City FC#Active roster (template should be renamed to match club's new name). Something being out of date is not a basis for deletion. GiantSnowman 21:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Of the 7 blue links at Lota Schwager#Current squad, 1 links to a rower, 1 links to a footballer who's article doesn't mention Lota Schwager and the other 5 players have infoboxes indicating that they left the club between 2013 and 2017. As such there are no valid links there. Syracuse Silver Knights squad is a more marginal case. However as I noted only 1 of the other 11 teams has a squad template (Category:Major Arena Soccer League templates) and that does seem to be maintained to a certain extent. My own view is that a "current" template that is not maintained is worse than useless, providing incorrect information. Nigej (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:This is a redirect/collapse top edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-templates of Template:This is a redirect which itself was redirected. Gonnym (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused and unneeded sub templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Whew! This takes me back. They were used with the This is a redirect template before it was completely redesigned to become the {{Redirect category shell}} template. Thought about placing {{Historical}} on these, but now I think their historical value is long past. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 20:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, and possibly speedy delete per db-author. Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-One-Reseed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bracket template. Gonnym (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. Highly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northwest Airlines Flight 253 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use nav template which, 12 years later, is now superseded in both usefulness and visual standardization by both Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence and Template:Infobox terrorist attack. Serves no function which is not already handled by the article's table of contents box Headphase (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Basically 3 links in the sidebar: Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, reactions and aftermath. All linked from the main article in other places and the 3 linked articles have clear links back to the main article. Oddly the text in the "Reactions and investigations" and "Aftermath" sections of the main article seems to be very similar to that in the separate articles, making me wonder whether 2 of the 3 linked articles are actually worth having. Also there's no category structure for this bombing attempt, which would help navigation. Nigej (talk) 18:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/chem styled edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added subpage {{Infobox drug/chem styled/atom}} explicitly for clarity. -DePiep (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, deprecated since 2015 because: don't use colored font, not to convey a legend meaning (per WP:access, and more). E.g. {{Chem2}} covers chemical formula. ​ DePiep (talk) 12:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is G7 (as they are the author and only contributor) incase an admin sees this and can close this early. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(I tried G7 via the talkpage but talkpage was not by me [1] ;-) -DePiep (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_19&oldid=1068162991"