Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 1

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 30 December 2 >

December 1 edit

Template:People v. Jackson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Many of these figures are hardly known for their involvement in this case (especially the defense witnesses) and the "other elements", which are related, are all included in Template:Michael Jackson, making this template redundant. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The more important articles are already featured on the Michael Jackson template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tritium edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Unused chemical symbol templates, similar to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_23#Template:Hypochlorite in that they create a link which is not necessarily helpful, and are redundant to {{chem}}/{{chem2}}. User:GKFXtalk 22:18, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and the Hypochlorite series/TfD. Could be speedy with me. -DePiep (talk) 08:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question User:GKFX, what with {{Element}}? Is not in the Nov 23 list, but looks functionally part of the family. Also covered by {{Chem}}/2. OTOH, mentioned in series {{Nuclide}} i.e., isotopes formatting and out of this scope. (IMO, {{Element}} can go unless special services are discovered). -DePiep (talk) 08:30, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DePiep: Yeah, that could be deleted too. The only special thing it does is antimatter, but that's easy enough with {{Physics particle|H|anti=yes}} →
H
. User:GKFXtalk 23:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Could really be speedy per previous TfD that just closed. Gonnym (talk) 09:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:@nehasaxenaofficial edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Deleted as test pages. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC) Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both created by the same user who created the Instagram name template below. These are not templates and most likely promotional material. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Morning Again edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Band navbox, no longer serves a purpose for navigation. I redirected three non-notable albums to the band article, which leaves this template with just the band itself, one member, and two related articles which don't use the template. Lennart97 (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:100 Most Common Family Names in Mainland China edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Basshunter series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

not needed since all the links are already in Template:Basshunter Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sidebar templates are much more intrusive than bottom navboxes with no additional value. Any missing link should be added to Template:Basshunter. Gonnym (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: What about Template:Donald Trump and Template:Donald Trump series? Eurohunter (talk) 16:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The same argument does not become better when you repeat it again. Gonnym (talk) 16:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: I'm trying to understand your argument because right now there is no any. Eurohunter (talk) 20:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My argument is that sidebars are intrusive and horrible and provide zero benefits over bottom navboxes, while on the other hand clutter the article and make it harder to read. In addition to a lot of the links not being links to articles but instead to sections. For an unknown reason, the political sidebars are a thing. That does not mean we should support it even further. Gonnym (talk) 10:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: So you should start discussion about this kind of templates or nominate all templates from Category:Sidebar templates to deletion. Removing only Template:Basshunter series is not any solution of hypothetical problem. Eurohunter (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please leave me alone. Gonnym (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting form of discussion. Eurohunter (talk) 23:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you stop with what can be considered personal attacks as this isn't helping your claim to keep the template as is as you haven't provided any contrary evidence other than saying false or saying all the links aren't there when it clearly is. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: Personal attacks? Where? How? Quote fragment which can be considered personal attack or cross out your words with <s>. I want arguments against existence of this template and there is no any. That is the problem. Everything is clearly written here. Eurohunter (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Instagram name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Deleted as a test page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC) Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems a highly specific template - for one person only. GRuban (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikidata fallback link/doc/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template should be deleted due to historical consolidation. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 11:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Histmerge and delete. Gonnym (talk) 15:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete —Uzume (talk) 19:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox time zone/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Izno (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chamber officers box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template has not been used by anyone. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 11:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to the /doc of Template:Chamber officers box begin. Gonnym (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I have requested speedy deletion of the move target recommended by Gonnym. All of the relevant templates can transclude the same documentation, but it should be moved first. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment that has broken a number of articles. I don't see why you would speedy delete the begin template, when this template has none of the coding the old being template had. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • It looks like an admin deleted the template instead of just deleting the /doc subpage. I'll see how to get that fixed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • I have fixed this problem. The documentation is shared among all of the relevant templates now, so the nominated template is safe to delete or redirect. It has no transclusions, but it does have a few incoming links from project pages, so converting it to a redirect to {{Chamber officers box begin}} is probably the lowest-impact outcome. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a disambiguation-type navigation point in template-space, that tells you how to use "chamber officials box" set of templates, and links to all of them. Though in future, someone should write a simplified "chamber officials box" and place it here, while the more complex set of templates are used for more extreme cases. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The documentation page for each of the actual templates serves this purpose. See {{AFB game box start}} for one of many similar template families. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:File with non-existent categories edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused template. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 11:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I should hope that clean up categories are currently being unused, since if they are being used, it means there's a problem needing fixing. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Same as below, should be fine to delete now. I don't really remember the motivation behind creating it. Legoktm (talk) 04:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:File with non-existent templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused template. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 11:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. A report of nonexistent template transclusions, Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates, is patrolled nearly every day, and the template transclusions are fixed. There is no need for a temporary maintenance tag when WP:REDNOT is a consensus guideline; it is easy to simply fix or remove non-existent templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, should be fine to delete now. I don't really remember the motivation behind creating it. Legoktm (talk) 04:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Sam Music edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Speedy deletion as created by a block-evading editor , and also effectively vandalism, as the psge was created as part of maintaining a hoax. JBW (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template created by a crosswiki spammer. See also it.wiki talk page and User talk:JBW/Archive 79#Abusive username. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Magdalena Andersson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and too early for a template as she has just become Prime Minister again. And no article exists outside of her mainspace that is related to her other than the cabinets she worked in for her predecessor. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Presidents of Barbados edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Heads of State of Barbados. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with Template:Heads of State of Barbados. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_1&oldid=1060030701"