Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< September 22 September 24 >

September 23

edit

Template:Cyclone_other_basin

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template has no documentation and is not used in any pages. MaelstromOfSilence (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Investors Exchange

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused stock listing template that now never can be used, because IEX has exited the stock listing business. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Habib

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary navbox. Since the song comes from the album there is no additional navigational benefit in having this. WP:NENAN. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 PDL Central Pacific Division

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 18:46, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:StringReplace/obsolete

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems implausible to me that there are still wikis that have outdated copies of this module over 7 months after it was undeleted for the purpose of syncing its code to other wikis. A post on the creator's talk page on April 16 asking if this module is still used has received no response. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brexit sidebar

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Great discussion, but there doesn't appear to be consensus for any particular course of action. Feel free to continue the discussion elsewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Brexit sidebar with Template:United Kingdom in the European Union.
largely duplicative templates. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The Brexit-only template is redundant, and should be merged into the one on British membership of the EU. - Ssolbergj (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do not merge. Both templates are about different things in their substance. One is about the UK in the EU, the other about the UK trying to leave. -Mardus /talk 16:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, they both concern the UK’s EU membership - be it accession, membership period or potential secession. -Ssolbergj (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • ^ Do not merge first. Then make a new proposal about separating Brexit content from the UK in the EU content. The 'UK in the EU' sidebar may link to an article about Brexit, which will show the Brexit sidebar anyway. The two topics are far too different and divergent for merging. I'm on the fence about nesting the Brexit sidebar into the 'UK in the EU' sidebar. -Mardus /talk 11:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_September_23&oldid=919300029"