Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 July 4

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 3 July 5 >

July 4 edit

Template:Infobox province or territory of Canada edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

N&W s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 01:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for former lines of the Norfolk and Western Railway. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Norfolk and Western Railway. Single transclusion replaced. There are also seven dependent s-line data modules to be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all, per nom. BLAIXX 17:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

North County Transit District s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 01:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for the North County Transit District which were superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/North County Transit District (SDNR refers to the old name of the agency, the San Diego Northern Railway). All transclusions replaced. There are also four dependent s-line data modules to be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Davenport Panthers softball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another Softball NAVBOX with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thomas A. Simone Award edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Metrolink (California) s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 01:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

s-line data modules

{{S-line}} templates for Metrolink (California) which were superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Metrolink (California). All transclusions replaced. There are also 14 dependent s-line data modules to be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 15:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MiWay color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/MiWay. All transclusions replaced. BLAIXX 15:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 V.League 1 table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ShortCutz Amsterdam Film Festival jury members edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. per prior discussion Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Double with Template:ShortCutz Amsterdam Film Festival Jury Members. (with a capital for jury) No need for a template for jury member of a short film festival, only based on IMDb-information The Banner talk 12:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Churches and chapels in Vatican City edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Vatican City topics. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Churches and chapels in Vatican City with Template:Vatican City topics.
Seemingly redundant part mirroring - seems like we can afford to keep it all together in the geography section of Vatican City topics? PPEMES (talk) 12:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, but most of the important topics are already on the main template, does it need every one? Randy Kryn (talk) 12:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say we can afford space for that. We just have to make a couple of subsections in the destination template. PPEMES (talk) 12:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, Churches and chapels in Vatican City is fairly small as far as templates go, hopefully won't be too much work.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 04:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Premier Reserve League South edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Competition has been defunct since 2012 Add92 (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, no need for a 'current' template and there is little point in a merge. GiantSnowman 08:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • If the pages themselves aren't being deleted (and I'm pretty sure they aren't), then how would one navigate between the teams of the league? Just because something stops to exists does not mean its connections aren't important anymore. --Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hierarchy of the Catholic Church edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Harvard Crimson softball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ivy League softball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX only has one link to a softball coach article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ivy League softball navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link to an actual article on a Ivy League softball team. The rest are links to the respective universities or their sports program pages. Some of the sports program pages don't even mention softball. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lil Nas X edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 June 26 as there is apparently still some room of disagreement on whether this meets the navbox criteria. It's a procedural nomination; myself I have got no opinion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - It literally satisfies WP:NENAN which was the basis given for its deletion the first time. Two more songs from his EP have articles now. None of the EP track articles link to each other without this template's existence, it’s helpful.—NØ 10:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - enough links now. --Gonnym (talk) 11:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I have always understood that WP:NENAN requieres a template to have three or more blue links, excluding the back link and an "Related"-section. Version 1 had already four proper links. The Banner talk 12:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • WP:NENAN calls for a "rule of five", not including the subject, which this did not meet until now. --woodensuperman 10:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep as per previous discussions Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 14:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. wumbolo ^^^ 14:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the explanations above. Thsmi002 (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_4&oldid=906460933"