Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 5 August 7 >

August 6 edit

Template:PAX 217 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of three links: the band's article, a band member's article and an album that redirects back to the band. Since the navigational template is only used in the band's article and navigates nowhere, the two article are already connected, there are no notable releases and not enough links to justify a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 22:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, no significant navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete too few links to be useful. --Trialpears (talk) 18:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Parlor Mob edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of two links: the band's article and an album. Since the two are already well connected, there are not enough links to justify a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 22:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, no significant navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete too few links to be useful. --Trialpears (talk) 18:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philosophy-of-language-key-terms edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious and redundant. It is included into a single article tagged as original research. The template is a dubious original research in its own. Nowhere from the article it follows that these are the (and the only) "essential terms" for article subject. Moreover, I doubt that ancient notions such as Genus and species are really essential today. How they can be essential, if they are not discussed in the article? And their own articles are a sore. If they are essential, then they must have their section and visible in the TOC, hence the template is redundant anyway. Earlier I misplaced the del request, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Philosophy-of-language-key-terms Staszek Lem (talk) 21:32, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete challenged WP:OR article content. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Essential terms including red links is quite dubious. If this is a verifiably a grouping made by independant sources recreate it with a reference. --Trialpears (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018–19 Macedonian First Football League table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article per consensus at WT:FOOTY and per request here. Frietjes (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Argentina national under-23 football team matches edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's no other navigational boxes about under-23 football team matches. Plus, the user who made this template, @Stephan Sensuality, created a bunch of other "under-23 national team navigational boxes", all of which got deleted as well. KingSkyLord (talk) 13:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, not needed. GiantSnowman 07:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom especially with the Olympics links not being particularly relevant. --Trialpears (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcome to sandbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be something that would better belong as a draft or user sandbox subpage, and might have been created as a test. –Sonicwave talk 00:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_6&oldid=910755948"