I've been asked a few times in the last couple of months to run for BAG, and it's an area of Wikipedia I feel I can be useful, so... here I am. I have 25 successful bot tasks with User:PrimeBOT, so I'm quite familiar with the BRFA process as well as the technical/regex-ical side of running bots. My other relevant activities on-wiki involve closing TFDs, RFCs, and other discussions, the first of which lately seems to be the subject material of a lot of bot requests (i.e. updating/fixing/changing templates).
In other words, I feel like I have the experience and temperament needed to be a productive member of the team. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
With wide support and having run for the standard duration, this nomination is closed as successful. — xaosfluxTalk 04:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Support As pesterer. Very knowledgeable, experienced, and active. SQLQuery me! 00:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Support knowledgable and skilled Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Sounds competent enough for the job. SemiHypercube✎ 01:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Support. Primefac continually demonstrates excellent judgement and dedication and I think he'd be a wonderful addition. ProgrammingGeek talktome 01:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Support per above -FASTILY 01:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Good botop and very considered editor. There are examples on Primefac's talkpage right now that show how thoughtful and helpful Primefac can be as a bot operator. Will be a good addition. ~ Amory(u • t • c) 02:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.