Made edits to scientific worksEdit

Hi, I noticed your deletion mark on Muneeb Ali. I realize that there is skepticism about blockchain-related personalities. However, Muneeb is a scientist like Emin Gün Sirer, Silvio Micali, and others. I edited the page to remove the emphasis on any "blockchain-related CEO" work and added links to Protothread, PoX consensus, etc (scientific works) along with new references from WSJ and ZDNet. I also noted the regulatory work instead of any CEO position. Hope these edits make sense -- thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedaemon (talkcontribs) 03:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

You appear to have been canvassing for an AfD you createdEdit

[1] which says:

"@Ysangkok: why did you ping me about this AfD nomination? Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 9:29 pm, 29 June 2020, Monday (11 days ago) (UTC+1) @Jtbobwaysf:. It was brought up in an argument against Gmax. Since you are now also in a feud with him, that would make you liable to take side in these matters also..." Doug Weller talk 17:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: can you quote the rule in Wikipedia:Canvassing that I am violating? --Ysangkok (talk) 18:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
WP:APPNOTE seems to apply. It was definitely not a neutral notification either. Doug Weller talk 18:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
@Doug Weller: what is the "definitely not neutral" word you identified? --Ysangkok (talk) 20:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
I didn't say "word". If you do something like this again expect to be blocked. Unless you go to Wikipedia talk:Canvassing and get consensus that you didn't canvas. If you do, let me know. Doug Weller talk 09:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisting an AFD you commented inEdit

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coins.ph. Please don't do that. Either participate, or act on the AFD, but commenting then relisting is a biased act by its very nature. The fact that you commented on the merits of the discussion automatically disqualifies you from relisting or closing. You've been around long enough to know better. Dennis Brown - 12:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I came here to make the same comment. Relisting is an option when an AfD closer cannot determine consensus and decides that additional input is helpful. As a participant, you are not in a position to close the discussion, and are therefore not in a position to relist it. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Let's make it a trio as I noticed this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin XT. I wouldn't have posted here except you haven't acknowledged either of the previous request. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
I acknowledge the receipt. When I relisted, I didn't know it was considered partisan. I thought it was just something for visibility, if one would like that. --Ysangkok (talk) 02:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
When you relist, you essentially preempt an admin from closing it, so it is considered an admin-like action. (Relisting moves the article to a different queue as well, so it isn't listed as "ready to close") You're welcome to relist when it is appropriate, or participate, but not both. Dennis Brown - 10:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Timeline has been nominated for renamingEdit

 

Category:Pages using Timeline has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctionsEdit

 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Perianne Boring for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perianne Boring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perianne Boring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MazaCoinEdit

I wish I had been able to see the AFD on MazaCoin. While looking around the discussion was non-Admin closed. I posted some information on the talk page if you are interested in looking at it. My main concern is the advancement of the many "fly-by-night", actually non-notable, digital currencies that do or may find their way into article space. The media attention that allows what looks to be good references, fall apart when, such as in this case, what is reported is false. If the Tribal leaders did not formally proclaim the coin as "official" then everything that follows (leading to a rebranding) is false. This is why news reporting is a part of what Wikipedia is not but that is often overlooked. Thank you, Otr500 (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

@Otr500: If you don't want to miss more AfDs you can watch User:Ysangkok/XfD log and Wikipedia:WikiProject Cryptocurrency/Article alerts. I also replied on the MazaCoin talk page. --Ysangkok (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Deprodding of Chainlink (cryptocurrency)Edit

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Chainlink (cryptocurrency), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Hocus00 (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

NTSBEdit

Special:LinkSearch/https://dms.ntsb.gov/public/

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #58545Edit

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)