Welcome! edit

Hi Your Pritam! I noticed your contributions to Bhushan Kumar and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Villain edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Villain. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Villain (disambiguation). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Villain (disambiguation). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ~ lovkal (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Your Pritam: please stop your disruptive editing. You have made an inappropriate content fork of Villain (disambiguation), and you've moved the article that was originally titled "Villain", introducing an egregious typo. Furthermore, your edits seem to be promotional in nature. Slow down, and try to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines before making further controversial edits. WindTempos (talkcontribs) 13:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of YourPritam edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on YourPritam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 edit

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Nexgen Venture edit

 

The page Nexgen Venture has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mirza (2023 film) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mirza (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ankush Hazra Motion Pictures moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Ankush Hazra Motion Pictures, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Autobiography edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Your Pritam, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 08:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bibaho Obhijaan 2 moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Bibaho Obhijaan 2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 10:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:List of Indian Bengali films of 2023 edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:List of Indian Bengali films of 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Villain (2018 film) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Villain (2018 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villain (2018 film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 15:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 - again edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kabir (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Desi Harry Potter edit

 

The article Desi Harry Potter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable short film. No indication that it meets the conditions of WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 15:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Savings Account (2022 film) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Savings Account (2022 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Don't change un necessary like this edit

you have changed the 2014 section don't know why , but for your kind information in 2014 bengali movies didn't do well as only chotushkone and bachchan did well @Your Pritam Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Savings Account (2022 film) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Savings Account (2022 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not ready for mainspace by a long shot, but a draft already exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 08:34, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Links to draft articles edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ankush Hazra and Kolkata Chalantika. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Your Pritam. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ankush Hazra, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hi Your Pritam, you haven't responded to this. Please do so before you make any more edits. What is your connection to Ankush Hazra, for instance?
Please also respond to the question about multiple accounts, below. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 12:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Savings Account (2022 film) (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiran Dutta (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mirza (2023 film) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mirza (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published.

Please see this guideline. bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

  Hello, Your Pritam, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as PritamMondal2022 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oindrila Sen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali film. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yaariyan 2 moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Yaariyan 2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move it to mainspace yourself. bonadea contributions talk 06:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 (2) edit

 

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. --bonadea contributions talk 06:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. bonadea contributions talk 13:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Your Pritam are you reading any of these warning messages? You are going to be blocked from editing if your disruptive edits continue. These concerns are taken very seriously by Wikipedia editors and will not just disappear if you ignore them. Ravensfire (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaariyan 2 (November 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SpencerT•C 01:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Abhimanyu (2006 film).

Do not re-add wikilinks pointing to articles that have been deleted.

Please respond to the many requests that you disclose any conflict of interest. bonadea contributions talk 13:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Savings Account (2022 film) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Savings Account (2022 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savings Account (2022 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:17, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chengiz for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chengiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chengiz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 18:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Bonadea, this is probably YourPritam7 / Iyourpritam under a new account that just wasn't spotted. Been enough disruption to warrant the SPI? Ravensfire (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Aritra Banerjee" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Aritra Banerjee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 19 § Aritra Banerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Rejoy2003. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Urfi Javed, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 13:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeet (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:YourPritam edit

  Hello, Your Pritam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:YourPritam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bibaho Obhijaan 2 edit

  Hello, Your Pritam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bibaho Obhijaan 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chengiz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kisi Ka Bhai Kisi Ki Jaan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chengiz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sacnilk is NOT a reliable source. Please stop trying to use it, your edits will continue to be reverted. Ravensfire (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian Bengali films, you may be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 01:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at YourPritam, you may be blocked from editing. Jay 💬 08:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 11 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chengiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divya Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 19 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chengiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divya Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of YourPritam edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on YourPritam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 04:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Deeksha Sharma edit

Hello Your Pritam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Deeksha Sharma for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Deeksha Sharma to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 08:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Your Pritam (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason=I'm a not promote anybody, I want to give correct information, and correct wrong information. }} Your Pritam (talk) 07:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's not why you are blocked. --Yamla (talk) 10:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply