User talk:Yamla/Archive 19

Archive 15

←

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

→

Archive 25

Question

Hey! How are you doing today? I have a question(s). A long time ago I created a T.I. videography page. Some vander came and merged it while I was M.I.A. I asked someone else if I can get this page back, and they said probably not. Is it possible to delete it and create it again or just leave how everything is? Thanks. Georgia Peachez (talk) 13:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I have some information for you

Are you familiar with User:Chadbryant? About two years ago WP:PW encountered a confirmed sock of Chadbryant known as User:Paul Harald Kaspar. This particular sock's last few edits removed references to anything professional wrestling-related from multiple articles. Recently User:Stan Simmons (contribs) has been engaging in similar activity.... There is evidence that suggests the user could be a sock of User:Paul Harald Kaspar/Chadbryant. [1]^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 19:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Happy Farm image

Hello. You deleted this image. It was a screen shot from a video game. I thought those are allowed. Can you please help? Thanks very much. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

That particular image, according to the description page, was being used solely to "identify the product" and to "illustrate the appearance of the product"; that is, for illustration only. This is insufficient. Wikipedia only allows screenshots to provide identification and critical commentary. For example, you can post a screenshot and attach it to a paragraph that specifically discusses that screenshot. But you can't post a general screenshot that simply illustrates the subject matter. --Yamla (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see. What if I added such a paragraph to the article describing the appearance of the game? Would the image then be allowed? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but only if you were discussing the specific screenshot. Perhaps a game has a totally unique artistic style, and there's a whole paragraph explaining why that artistic style is new and unique. Then, a screenshot would be appropriate because the paragraph is hard to understand without the screenshot, and you are using the copyrighted image to provide critical commentary. It would not be appropriate to use a screenshot just to show what the game looks like, or just to illustrate the article generally. Let me know if you want more information! --Yamla (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

No loophole, eh? Okay. Thanks for the good info. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

FARC: Bangladesh

Hey mate, would you take a look at the article. It really needs an independent image editor's help. There's been issues with images. Please, help the article if you can. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 04:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Aishwarya Rai?

When I visited "https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche" today, but before I had logged in, the top of the page had a couple of links titled "New messages" and "last change".

The New Messages link goes to "https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:192.158.61.140&redirect=no" and says "adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Aishwarya Rai, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability."

To my knowledge, I have not ever visited this page, let alone edited it.

Since this message came to me and was not for me, I thought I should advise you of the possibility that it also did not go to the person who actually made the edit to which you objected.

Bill_Starr (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Courtney Love/GA1

A GAN has started on Courtney Love and is currently on hold for an initial seven days to allow contributors to deal with copy-edit issues, building the lead, and trimming excessive detail. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 18:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Suri Cruise

Please unprotect the Suri Cruise redirect so it can become an article. While the redirect was perhaps the correct choice 5 years ago, when Suri's only claim to fame was being the baby of a celebrity, she has since become a celebrity in her own right, as a quick google search will likely attest. Warren Dew (talk) 07:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. --Yamla (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Brad Pitt

This is a note to let the main editors of Brad Pitt know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 10, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 10, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Brad Pitt (born 1963) is an American actor and film producer. Pitt has received two Academy Award nominations and five Golden Globe Award nominations, winning one. Described as one of the world's most attractive men, Pitt's first leading roles in big-budget productions came with A River Runs Through It (1992) and Interview with the Vampire (1994). He was cast opposite Anthony Hopkins in the 1994 drama Legends of the Fall, which earned him his first Golden Globe nomination. In 1995 he gave critically acclaimed performances in the crime thriller Seven and the science fiction film 12 Monkeys, the latter securing him a Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actor and an Academy Award nomination. Four years later, in 1999, Pitt starred in the cult hit Fight Club. He then starred in the major international hit as Rusty Ryan in Ocean's Eleven (2001) and its sequels, Ocean's Twelve (2004) and Ocean's Thirteen (2007). His greatest commercial successes have been Troy (2004) and Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005). Following a high-profile relationship with actress Gwyneth Paltrow, Pitt was married to actress Jennifer Aniston for five years. Pitt lives with actress Angelina Jolie in a relationship that has generated wide publicity. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Yamla,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.115.210 (talk) 21:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

GAR for Mila Kunis

Just alerting you, as per Community reassessment guidelines at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment ("please notify major contributing editors" to a given article) that a Good Article Reassessment has begun for Mila Kunis, at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mila Kunis/1. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Reverbnation150x120black.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Reverbnation150x120black.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Angelina Jolie

This is a note to let the main editors of Angelina Jolie know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 19, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 19, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Angelina Jolie (born 1975) is an American actress, film director, and screenwriter. She has received an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress (for her performance in the 1999 drama Girl, Interrupted), two Screen Actors Guild Awards, and three Golden Globe Awards, and was named Hollywood's highest-paid actress by Forbes in 2009 and 2011. Jolie promotes humanitarian causes as a Special Envoy and former Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. She has often been cited as the world's "most beautiful" woman. Jolie made her screen debut as a child alongside her father Jon Voight in Lookin' to Get Out (1982). Her first leading role in a major film was in the cyber-thriller Hackers (1995). She achieved wide fame after her portrayal of video game heroine Lara Croft in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001), and received critical acclaim for her performances in the dramas A Mighty Heart (2007) and Changeling (2008). She made her directorial debut with the wartime drama In the Land of Blood and Honey (2011). Divorced from actors Jonny Lee Miller and Billy Bob Thornton, Jolie now lives with actor Brad Pitt, in a relationship notable for fervent media attention. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Atlantis_(TV_series)

WP:BITE [2] Andy Dingley (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

War Doctor image

Arg, copyright. Bane of my existence. Thanks for the note, would {{Non-free promotional}} work? – Bellum (talk) (contribs) 19:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I definitely think {t|Non-free promotional}} would work. And yeah, I hear you. :( --Yamla (talk) 20:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Violation of Copyright Policy

I ain't violated any copyright policy. Because while uploading the picture in Sherlyn Chopra, I have clearly described that it is a non-free work, and it is only for a fair use. Now, you didn't even read it and deleted the image. I have given clearly, who is the author and owner of it and link to the website. I really don't know why you did it! --Joseph 02:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

There was a free image already available, thus the image you uploaded could not possibly be fair-use. --Yamla (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Violation of Copyright Policy

Please remember the fact that anyone can edit Wikipedia. So, you are saying that since there already a photo available we can't change the photo. It's quite funny. I changed it because the photo already being there was an old one. I am sad to see that now you are violating one's freedom to edit Wikipedia. --Joseph 16:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Not at all. Simply that you can't change a freely-licensed image with a copyrighted image. See WP:FUP --Yamla (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for your help! Jppcap (talk) 23:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Richard Harris

Why did you remove the Richard Harris image from Tower House? There appears to be a detailed justification on the files description. [3] Gareth E Kegg (talk) 15:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Ignore the above, I can see it now. Has it really been six years since that warning? Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Colton Cosmic

I don't know if you had the notifications system set up or not, so I figured I'd post here. Colton has requested you and two others review his block. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Help on HappyBird page

While reviewing HappyBird page, it was that page creator has provided false information. It is clear that manufacturer of company is ANGEL (http://www.angeldigital.com.au/) where page creator has listed Digital Angel (http://www.digitalangel.com/) of United States which can be copyright infringement as they are two different companies. Ireneshih (talk) 12:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 10 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sarah McLachlan page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Felicia Day

If the source doesn't work and there's no chance it will ever be restored, I guess you're right. But didn't User:TJRC just add another source? – PeeJay 21:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I see TJRC did! Okay, great! Thanks for responding. --Yamla (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Gordon Dirks

Hello Yamla,

Thanks for your note. I have indeed been trying to fix the removal/vandalism of referenced material (last current paragraph). The section has previously been edited by others and there was some consensus reached to a more balanced section. It was then removed several times this morning. Prior to your note I have sent a message to Admin. Bearcat informing him that Mr. Dirks is currently in an election in Calgary, Alberta, (on October 27, 2014) and the page will likely be the subject of repeated attempts to edit. Any advice on your part is appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunfox1 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC) --Sunfox1 (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC) (Sorry, forgot to sign earlier!)

Global account

Hi Yamla! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Official sources for National Animals, don't worry

About the National Animal article, we sometimes don't need the official sources or references, the people of a country can tell you what animal it is. For example, the Kazakhs told us that their national animals is the snow leopard and the golden eagle. If you want to know a national animal that is not mentioned on the article. Go to a country and ask the people, what animal is their country's national animal. 84.247.77.20 change the animal from lynx to bison. She is from Romania, the people of her country told her that the national animal is a bison. No concerns for that, OK. 174.91.75.172 (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

This is incorrect. Wikipedia requires that information is verified. "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material." So, what you are suggesting is not acceptable. The information does indeed need a citation. We very regularly get false information on that page. --Yamla (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Then who can I ask? their governments. What happens if Wikipedia is filled with false information in all articles? 174.91.75.172 (talk) 01:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Any sort of reliable source would work. For Canada, for example, we use [4] and the related page, [5]. You can see that these are official government pages. We don't _need_ a government page, though, just a reliable source. If you find an article that you think has incorrect information (or even if you aren't sure, but there's no reliable source), you can (and probably should) challenge it. See [6] for more information on that. Specifically, you add a citation needed tag. --Yamla (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

If I couldn't find any evidence, what can I do now? 174.91.75.172 (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

If you are trying to add information, you can't do it. If you are trying to challenge existing information, add a citation needed tag. :) --Yamla (talk) 02:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm a guy without a real user page.

Why did you said "I'm a guy without a real user page." Every Wikipedian has information on who they are. 174.91.70.223 (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

P.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_national_animals&oldid=646591041
Sorry about the mistake. This is due to mouse problems on my computer. 174.91.70.223 (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Zennie

Zennie has asked to be unblocked (UTRS appeal #13133). I'm tempted to go ahead and accept that request; IMO, whatever the original block reason, over 7 years is more than enough time to justify a second chance. Are there some circumstances that would make this otherwise, such as abuse more recent than 2007 that I might not be aware of? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 02:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

I believe all of this user's contributions were spam. So long as they no longer plan on posting inappropriate external links on Wikipedia, it would be entirely reasonable to unblock them. To be clear, it'd also be perfectly fine to just assume good faith, unblock them without any such promise, and then just reblock them if they resume spamming. So, nope, no objection. --Yamla (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Company adding

Hello,

I want to add company page on wikipedia . Is it possible to add?If yes can you please guide me?

This would generally not be appropriate. See WP:COI. You are free to create it in your sandbox, though, and have someone look over your work! --Yamla (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Rachel Notley and related articles.

Howdy. I think we'll need a range block for the 197.132.xxx GoodDay (talk) 14:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah. That's a pretty big range, though. I'd be more comfortable semi-protecting the articles in question. Any idea which articles are being vandalised? --Yamla (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I've requested 'semi-protection' for Rachel Notley, Premier of Alberta, List of premiers of Alberta, Alberta New Democratic Party and Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta. I'm also keeping an eye on Template:Alberta politics. -- GoodDay (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Most were already protected by someone else. I added protection to the template, too. Note that there appears to be a date for the transition. --Yamla (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

He/she's back again, see List of female first ministers in Canada. -- GoodDay (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Blocked the IP address and reinstated protection on that page. Grumble grumble. --Yamla (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Atleast, this will end in 3 days :) GoodDay (talk) 18:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Identification friend or foe

I just wanted to stop in and thank you for your work adding references to this article. I was not aware of the National Secure Mode abilities on newer IFF systems - the systems I am familiar with were before such a feature was around. I want to apologize for my misunderstanding the statement in the article, in light of this context. Thanks again. 67.165.69.4 (talk) 06:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

(Responding on your talk page) --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

1952 Alberta election

According to the list of members elected at Alberta_general_election,_1952 two CCF MLAs were elected in 1952, Elmer Roper in Edmonton (provincial electoral district) and Nick Dushenski in Willingdon (electoral district). The fact that Dushenski was elected at the 1952 general election is confirmed here and Roper's election is confirmed here so, regardless of what the summary on the Elections Alberta site says, it does appear that the CCF did elect 2 MLAs in 1952, not 1. Why is there a discrepancy between two reliable and credible sources? I don't know. Given that the book I cite is more detailed, and that every source on Roper and Dushenski agree they were elected in 1952 at the general election, rather than at a subsequent by-election, I suspect it's more likely an error crept into Elections Alberta's online summary. Sophie Moxie (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

As for my edit to Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta which you've reverted, please specify which of the information I added is "bad". It's all taken from the various wikipedia articles on Alberta general elections (Yes, the party was the Conservatives and not the Progressive Conservatives prior to 1959 but that's just a change in name, it was the same party). Sophie Moxie (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and we do not allow it to be used as a citation for other articles. --Yamla (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

And what about the two CCF MLAs in 1952? Sophie Moxie (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Fair use rational

Re the deletion of image at Elite Dangerous article. I thought the rational was sound. On which grounds did you object and deleted the image? Your del info states "Remove deleted image missing mandatory detailed fair-use rationale". However, i have provided the mandatory rational after it was tagged by you. I used this rational here as an example. prokaryotes (talk) 18:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

It's not sufficient to use a fair-use image under that license, solely for illustration. The license shows you have to also use the image to provide critical commentary. For example, if the screenshot is showing something unique and there's a section in the article discussing that unique thing. If the screenshot is solely for illustration, we have to delete it. :( --Yamla (talk) 19:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

But the image exactly shows a scene which is outlined under the gameplay section. The scene in the image is the most common ingame screen. Do you know the game at all? prokaryotes (talk) 19:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

You stated that the image was used solely for illustration. That conflicts with the license, which states that illustration alone is not sufficient. I do indeed know the game, I was one of the early backers and have many hours of gameplay. It's not immediately clear to me, reading the gameplay section, how you need the image to provide critical commentary. Could you please explain how the image is doing more than simply illustrating the article? To be clear, it's very possible that it is doing more than simply illustrating, even though you claimed it was only being used for illustration. --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

The last paragraph elaborates on space stations and planets, and the image illustrates this. And why don't you improve the the image description or the rational when fully aware that the picture shows a common ingame scene, outlined under the gameplay section. I could have written something like a typical scene with a space station where player docks or analyzes planets of newly discovered star systems, but i wasn't aware that any word is used with the scope to delete otherwise valid content. You also didn't said anything albeit fully aware after commenting at the media copyright issue i brought up related to this. prokaryotes (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

You said the image was solely used for illustration. I agreed, then and now. I don't think you are using the image to provide constructive criticism on that part of the gameplay. As you said it was used solely for illustration, and as I agreed, and as such use is not permitted on the Wikipedia, I removed the image under our fair-use policy. To be clear, if you want to reupload it and point out how it's being used to provide critical commentary, not just for illustration, that's entirely acceptable. --Yamla (talk) 20:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Can we undelete the image too, because i erased it from my hard disc. prokaryotes (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Restored, File:Elite-Dangerous-Orbital-Station.jpg. --Yamla (talk) 20:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, great. I readded the image and pointed out what the image illustrates. prokaryotes (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Checking in: Uber History section?

Hi Yamla, I notice that you've been active on the Uber (company) article lately. Thanks for the edits there reversing vandalism, by the way! Did you happen to notice my note on the talk page regarding the History section? Did you have any thoughts? Thanks, Craig at Uber (talk) 23:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

GeForce 1000 Series

I noticed you undid my revision on that page. But it's not about being a crystal ball. If you search for "NVidia Pascal" on Google News, you are going to found all the info I stated, and much of it comes from NVidia's slides. The only "unconfirmed" thing was the ammount of VRAM, but it's usual for high-end video cards to feature the maximum VRAM a tecnology supports (in case of HBM 2, featured on the NVidia Pascal GPUs, that means 32 GB).

I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know how to propperly add sources, however, I see various articles with unsourced info that aren't simply removed. Usually, someone adds a sign stating that not all content is sourced and that the reader can "help make the article better" by finding reliable sources. 152.249.63.132 (talk) 14:35, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not introduce challenged information without providing a reliable citation. You can provide a citation by using the 'Cite' dropdown when editing. Remember, the citation must be from a reliable source, so you can't just use blogs (except, well, Nvidia's blog I suppose). --Yamla (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Yamla. You have new messages at WP:MCQ.
Message added 09:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ww2censor (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

User: Actionjackson09

Hey Yamla, thank you for the feedback! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Actionjackson09 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

I have reworked those edits accordingly. Actionjackson09 (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Much appreciated! --Yamla (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

User: Cards84664

Hello! Thank you very much for the semi block of the Mentor High School page. I am a student there currently, and we have suspected the middle schoolers of using our wifi network a few times now. :) Cards84664 (talk) 00:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

No problem. --Yamla (talk) 00:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

More socks of Mzajmi

MarinZ23 and Marinozajmi74 appear to be new socks of Mzajmi: Same articles, same edits. BMK (talk) 01:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

[sigh] Really hard to get through to that person. I'll block right away. --Yamla (talk) 02:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

User:Mzajmi

This editor, who you indef blocked recently, is back as User:Mzajmi2. I have reverted their edits, but an indef for block evasion would be a good idea, I think. BMK (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, will block. --Yamla (talk) 14:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I see you blocked another one as well. BMK (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

You misunderstand the situation... see the talk page. I am reverting that which requires consensus. I referenced the rules to back up my claims.

The writers of some parts of the article have yet to gain my consent aswell as others. I am following NPOV... I added citations to my addtions. To revert the whole article is absurd.

I have followed up on the article's talk page. --Yamla (talk) 01:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your block of Anonymous_573462i

Yamla, blocking User:Anonymous_573462i with reference to 3RR wasn't such a good idea. They had reverted three times, not four — count 'em — of course you know consecutive edits count as one — and the last of those reverts was reverting you. You were completely involved. Yes, they were being disruptive, and clueless about how Wikipedia works, and another, uninvolved admin might have blocked them for that, but that's not what happened. Nor had they been given a 3RR warning. And they're new. I considered unblocking, in fact I just now went to their page to do so, but then I noticed their latest comment, "using a proxy until this blows over so it's not a problem really". Completely unacceptable, and it also makes me doubt that they're genuinely new, so handy as they are with templates and proxies. So I've extended to block instead. :-) But please don't block where you're involved, unless it's a clear case of 3RR — if it is, I for one won't object. Bishonen | talk 11:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC).

I'm confused as to why you think they hadn't received a 3RR warning. See here and here. And the three reverts are here and here and here. It is indeed the case that I rolled back one revert, though, so point taken. --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, but yeah. Three reverts, not four. --Yamla (talk) 12:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I see you did warn them on their page here, sorry. But if they're a genuinely new user — which I doubt, but anyway — it's best to point to the 3RR in a really noticeable way and explain it, like with {{subst:uw-3rr}}, rather than just link the policy. Anyway, they seem to have had talkpage access removed now after further charming remarks. Bishonen | talk 16:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC).

Good to know for the future, thanks! --Yamla (talk) 16:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Princess Diana

Could you explain to me how my edits were "vandalism"? 173.34.65.65 (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

I have not reverted your edits under this IP address. I think you are confused. If you were editing from a different IP address, you'll want to link the revert in question. I haven't made any reverts to that page in the last 500 edits, i.e. not for over six months (at least), so I think you are just confused. --Yamla (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Not vandalism

Hi,

This edit made by 71.11.116.64 is not vandalism. Adding unsourced information is not considered vandalism; there's {{uw-unsourced1}} for that. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

I disagree. In that specific case, the user was claiming that the citation proved the release date was January 3rd, 2016. They weren't adding unsourced information, they were claiming the information they added was sourced. Furthermore, they were doing so after being very explicitly warned not to do exactly that, in the comment in the article. {{uw-unsourced1}} is a great template and definitely useful when someone adds unsourced material. But I don't believe it applies here. --Yamla (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Not vandalisim (II)

It's not vandalism. 1) The Parliament of Canada website uses the spelling "Labor-Progressive Party" 2) [http://www.socialisthistory.ca/Docs/CPC/LPP44-Cover1.jpg The LPP used that spelling as well\. 192.235.252.195 (talk) 02:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta

It seems to be constructive to you buster got it?

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I wish to leave Wikipedia at once?

You are _already_ blocked under Moatassemakmal (talk · contribs) and are not permitted to edit. --Yamla (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Blocked 41.69.0.0/16, 197.132.0.0/16, 105.199.0.0/16 as part of Moatassemakmal (talk · contribs) block. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Moatassemakmal

Thanks for that. I knew that it was a user who had previously been blocked for being disruptive, because I'd already seen him post a request to another administrator's talk page for unblocking of his account creation privileges, but he didn't specify in that request what username he had been blocked under — so while that knowledge certainly influenced my responses to him, I didn't know where to look for his prior edit history and thus wasn't able to determine exactly what he had been blocked for. Now that I know, I definitely see patterns in the edit history that are completely consistent with what I was dealing with: a total obsession with Canadian provincial and territorial politicians that I'm not sure I understand if he's from Egypt; a deeply tangled mix of legitimate and unproductive edits that were ridiculously difficult to sort out; a total unwillingness to discuss things if he was challenged; an uncollaborative and pissy attitude; a stubborn insistence on reinserting any edit that was reverted or removed for any reason no matter how many times it was explained to him. Guess it's true what they say about tigers and stripes.

Yeah, there was a death threat in there, but given that the likelihood of actually being able to track down another Wikipedia editor is so vanishingly low I was never seriously worried about it — I was more annoyed by his attitude than anything else. I definitely lost my cool a couple of times, and got ALL-CAPS SHOUTY in my responses to him — understandably, I'll admit. But there was also a point at which I was able to just go totally zen at the ridiculousness of it all, and stay calm even though I was repeating myself for the 758th time.

Thanks again. My life these days has an unfortunate habit of placing me in situations where I have to keep bashing my head against a brick wall, and can't just walk away because either there's nowhere else to walk away to in the first place, or the wall has the power to follow me wherever I walk away to, so I have to just keep bashing and bashing — so it's kind of reassuring to be reminded that my read of the situation wasn't actually divorced from reality. Bearcat (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Michael Cooper

Party's photog — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itswaytoolong (talk • contribs) 19:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Great to hear! In that case, it's entirely appropriate for you to add these images to the politicians' pages. Beware of WP:COI, it's inappropriate to make more extensive edits, but I don't see you doing that. Is there an email address posted on an official party website that you can point me to, so I can verify your statement? That way, there'll be no question about copyright in the future. --Yamla (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Not vandalism, it's accurate history.

I have not and will not vandalize. I have proof, it was given to me by Ultimate Being Zorp. Zorp came to me in a vision and afterwards left me a copy of the historical documents of all Hollywood actors/actresses. You cannot oppress me, as a member of the UCA (Ultimate Cosmic Alliance) Level 5 Being, I have a higher intelligence clearance than most sapiens on Terra. Most but not all, ex: Abraham Lincoln who is still alive and living in the cosmos with Zorp and its underlings, had a Level 6 Being. I command you to leave me be and to not interrupt my work again. Hail Zorp. MasterOfNuns (talk) 20:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Mo redux

Another IP number which resolves to Egypt, User:41.69.71.245, is making unsourced and unverifiable edits around term-of-office dates in Canadian provincial and territorial legislatures again. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I replaced the range ban and rolled back the edits. --Yamla (talk) 18:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Note that his Internet service provider offers up three different ranges and I only blocked one at the moment. I'll block the other two if he doesn't get the hint. --Yamla (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

User:SSSRVsegda2017

They didn't use the User:SSSRVsegda account 4 days ago, you're mistaken. Check the history on User_talk:SSSRVsegda. They used the 2017 account to make the unblock request 4 days ago.--v/r - TP 19:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Ah, you are correct. My mistake. That said, I'd still have declined the unblock given the continued editing. You are more than free to disagree with me and overrule my decline (or, if not an admin, restate the request yourself). I'll be happy to stipulate to my mistake with the account name. --Yamla (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

They submitted an unblock request on UTRS. I'm just going to let some other sysop take that ticket. But this was one of the things they asked that be shared on-wiki.--v/r - TP 19:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

can you add this?

my last edit was going to be Foodfight!. it would be under the Critical reception.

Jetcold0 (talk) 04:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC) i want you to add this to Critical reception: the Web_series Nostalgia_Critic's overhall is;"This is awful! It's awful! I'd much rather read the credits like I'm reading a memorial of all the poor people who gave their life to this horribleness! And you know what? The price of the movie doesn't matter. Okay, yeah, it does. A lot. But the point I'm trying to make is whether it was made for 65 million dollars or 65 dollars, there is nothing to be proud of in this movie. Everybody should be ashamed for even acknowledging it exists. The animation is the worst. They never look alive. The jokes are the worst. They never once get a laugh. The characters are the worst. They're all just stereotypes of stereotypes. The plot is the worst. It's a joke. Literally. It's all written as a joke, but one with no good setup or punchline. And given the roundup of movies I've done over the years, that's saying a lot! In fact, I don't think human hands could've made it. I think something much more horrendous and disrespectful had to pull its energy together and make something so awful! In fact, I don't think human hands could've made it. I think something much more horrendous and disrespectful had to pull its energy together and make something so awful! the evil will never truly go away. This is the worst animated film I have ever seen. Hands down, no comparison. Its scars are left deep inside of me. Why did I do it? For you. I did it for you. Because I know that I have seen the worst. I know that no other form of animation will ever be worse than Foodfight. the evil will never truly go away. This is the worst animated film I have ever seen. Hands down, no comparison. Its scars are left deep inside of me. Why did I do it? For you. I did it for you. Because I know that I have seen the worst. I know that no other form of animation will ever be worse than Foodfight. To all those critics foolish enough to think they can review Foodfight, I won't lie to you about your chances. You have my sympathies. It will not leave you the same way it found you. Its scars run deep. If there is anyone damn sane enough to try and take on this film, all I have to say is...be strong. Be brave." Jetcold0 (talk) 04:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

You seem confused. That sort of edit is what lead to your block initially. It's inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Shouzheng0001

Is abusing his talk page while blocked. Feinoha ^Talk 01:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Reblocked to take away access to the talk page. Let's hope that gets the message across! --Yamla (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Moatassemakmal

Yamla, I,am very truly deeply apologize for the suffer I caused. I never mean't to threaten you or harm you I just ask you from my bottom of heart I know my disruptive behavior and sock puppetry out of control was very imminent to myself and my responsibilities as a editor, I'LL be careful from now on. You knew me about year ago on my actions but I just wanna help to make Wikipedia into good shape and improvement and you took that away from me. you knew my user account creation been blocked for 2 years and for myself I been interested and obsessive on Canadian federal, provincial and territorial politics. So I learned my lesson from now on I'll be helpful. Can I ask for my forgiveness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.132.255.58 (talk) 10:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

You can, and you can show you are serious by refraining from editing Wikipedia for six months. After that time, it would be appropriate to ask for an unblock and to demonstrate good faith by showing a proposed edit on your talk page (rather than by editing an article directly). Any further edits, though, and I'll withdraw this offer. You have been hugely abusive and a massive problem for years now. --Yamla (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm disappointed to see you have continued with your abusive behaviour, Moatassemakmal. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Abuse by administrator

I have been following the appeals against a block made by user 81.157.88.21. I note on more than one occasion your tone and actions have been abusive. I find it unacceptable that you reverted the content of user 81.157.88.21's last appeal; reproduced below:

{{unblock}}

It seems to me that you do not understand the appeals process and so I will be reporting you for abuse of administrative power.

You are confused. When you are blocked, you are not allowed to continue editing. Your continued abusive edits show the other admin's block of your address was entirely appropriate. --Yamla (talk) 11:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

I am an observer and not someone who has been blocked as you erroneously imply. I take issue with your language. Your insult 'You are confused', clearly implying that I am not of sound mind is unacceptable. As an administrator, you should know better than to ridicule others' mental health. Mental illness is a serious issue and as such should not be belittled. First, you demonstrate an abuse of power against user 81.159.255.77 and now you insult me for highlighting your abuse. These are the actions of a bully. I expect an apology, otherwise I will report you for abuse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.89.36 (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

You do know we can see your IP address, right? And your history of edits? --Yamla (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

I didn't see an apology there. You clearly don't understand the devastating effect that mental illness can have. People like you perpetuate the stigma attached to mental illness. Do you this for the sense of faux-authority it gives you? You should be ashamed of yourself. In time, for your own sake, I hope you come to realise the error of your ways. Perhaps in retrospect this interaction will prove to have been the beginning of a personal transformation for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.89.36 (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

End of sock puppetry of Moatassemakmal

Yamla, look you know me on my case since a year ago but it's time move on. From now on I've been surrendered my sock puppetry for sake of my reputation as editor and I'll keep my abusive behavior very low silent. I want to continue my editing work how I used to be. So you can lift the 36 hour block and will never ever happen again. But I have an agreement to you no more interference and no more irrelevant block range on me. Be happy good administrator. This is final talk with you and me. So, Goodbye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.133.9.241 (talk) 19:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your abusive block avoidance is continuing unabated. Your claim that you have 'surrendered my sock puppetry' is simply not true. See for example edit, which occurred seconds ago. Not to mention your personal attacks such as [7], nor your documented threats of physical violence and your death threats. I extend the WP:STANDARD OFFER to you. Zero edits for six months, then your unblock will be considered. Until then, remember that the block applies to you, Moatassemakmal (talk · contribs); your IP address range will continue to be blocked and your edits reverted until you get the message. --Yamla (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)