Jetcold0

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Garbage Pail Kids Movie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Garbage Pail Kids Movie was changed by Jetcold0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955177 on 2016-04-21T04:19:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at North (1994 film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: North (1994 film) was changed by Jetcold0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967723 on 2016-04-21T04:28:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Batman & Robin (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Batman & Robin (film) was changed by Jetcold0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883866 on 2016-04-21T04:43:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battlefield Earth (film).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Battlefield Earth (film) was changed by Jetcold0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937124 on 2016-04-21T04:55:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for advertising non-notable website. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jetcold0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i was just putting addininal info because i thought the web series Nostalgia Critic was a popular web series and was a reliable Critic that deserves to have the reviews of his films to be on the film pages

Decline reason:

So why didn't you stop when you were warned? And what reason do we have to believe you won't continue? Yamla (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-free rationale for File:Disney After Dark.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Disney After Dark.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Marvel After Dark.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 00:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jetcold0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

As you have not demonstrated you understand why your edits were inappropriate, nor demonstrated exactly how you'd do them differently if unblocked, there are no grounds to lift the block at this time. Yamla (talk) 18:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i am just trying to add what i thought was the complete information on vivendi games, i am sorry if i'd messed that up i even put it on the talk page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jetcold0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i do not understand why i am blocked, tell me what i did and i will reveiw my mistake, and i will try to explain my mistake Jetcold0 (talk) 23:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is "Persistent addition of unsourced content, block evasion". The rest you're going to have to do yourself. 331dot (talk) 23:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jetcold0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

here is the reason the user ferret blocket me: :This is the same mostly unsourced additions an IP made a short while back. Are you planning to actual address the lack of sources? -- ferret (talk) 00:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC) i hope i can explain: i was providing a link to the the cendant accounting scandal, so users can look up more information, and why cendant sold off it's video game division. i also added information for vivendi's aquision and selling of universal pictures, hence why there called vivendi universal, and made many games based on universal properties, including hulk (2003), they also had their own video game division, universal interactive studios, (whitch owned the rights to the Spyro and Crash Bandicoot franchises). i thought the vivendi\interplay deal was importiant. i thought the selling of knolege interactive and aquisition of radical entertainment was importiant. Jetcold0 (talk) 23:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block. Additionally, please learn to use the ⇧ Shift key; proper sentence capitalisation and punctuation will make it more likely that you will be taken seriously. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2020

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rainmaker Digital Effects. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scooby-Doo! and the Loch Ness Monster, you may be blocked from editing. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 22:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at A Pup Named Scooby-Doo. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 01:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced edit on On Your Mark

Hi there!

Please read through this Wikipedia policy page: WP:VERIFY. Content that is added to Wikipedia needs to be added with a reliable source or inline citation. I recently reverted your edit to the article On Your Mark because it was unsourced. Feel free to add it back in if you provide a reliable source. Thanks! - Whisperjanes (talk) 00:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (video game) into E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm Lars.Dormans. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pac-Man_(Atari_2600), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lars.Dormans (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toshihiko Masuda

The article Toshihiko Masuda has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Answer Studio

The first two sources you gave me are unreliable because they fail WP:USERG. Adam9007 (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Toshihiko Masuda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Toshihiko Masuda, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Texas Chain Saw Massacre into Bryanston Distributing Company. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Beauty and the Beast (2017 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source you cited does not support the material you added in any way. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toshihiko Masuda (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toshihiko Masuda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Toshihiko Masuda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 22:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Jetcold0! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 22:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 17:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Toshihiko Masuda

Hello, Jetcold0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Toshihiko Masuda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)