Wizardtower, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Wizardtower! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blacklist Mastering System (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Coin945 (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blacklist Mastering System (September 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Blacklist Mastering System concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blacklist Mastering System, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Blacklist Mastering System

edit
 

Hello, Wizardtower. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Blacklist Mastering System".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Blacklist Mastering System}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. RichT|C|E-Mail 22:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Blacklist Mastering System concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blacklist Mastering System, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Magicmail moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Magicmail, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 21:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please provide more information and justification for pulling this. This has two verifiable and independant references included, and conforms to similar wikipedia articles for other similar email platforms. What would you consider more reliable than the trademark offices? And company registries?

Wizardtower (talk) 22:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magicmail (May 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Wizardtower. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Magicmail, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Lapablo (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Response

edit

I get it, which is why ONLY the barest of FACTS were posted, including hard external references, eg trademarks, and company registrars. We will allow others to expand on the details, but you will notice almost every other email server product has a listing on WikiPedia, this is NOT for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting, but an easy way for internet users to lookup the product when for instance they receive emails with the MagicMail reference in their headers etc..

I don't mind posting a COI (that wasn't the reason given for the removal though), I did try as a matter of fact, but having never done a COI, not sure I did it correct, the examples on the Wiki help were hard to follow in that regard.

Oh, and the 'avoid' linking to the organizations website, I believe that is standard operating procedure for every product listed on the email servers Wiki. Wizardtower (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Clientid

edit
 

The article Clientid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Without sources, there is no indication that this subject meets the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Clientid for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clientid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clientid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Magicmail

edit
 

Hello, Wizardtower. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Magicmail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply