User talk:WikiRedactor/Archive 3

Bangerz

Hi, WikiRedactor, I was doing some cleanup at Bangerz and noticed you left this hidden message regarding edits that list the song "4x4" as a single without sources: "ADDING "4x4" IS CONSIDERED VANDALISM WITHOUT A RELIABLE SOURCE." Please remember that while continually reverting unsourced or improperly sourced content can be frustrating, we should assume good faith with editors who may not be familiar with all of our policies. Vandalism refers only to edits that are intentionally disruptive. –Chase (talk / contribs) 22:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

And while I'm here, did you get my ping at Talk:Beautiful (Mariah Carey song)? I had to use Template:Reply to twice as there were more than 7 contributors to the original discussion but I'm not sure if that works or not. –Chase (talk / contribs) 22:20, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: My apologies, I did not mean to give the wrong impression on the Bangerz article. And yes, I did receive your ping! WikiRedactor (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey! Not to sound annoying, but if you get a chance, could you drop by the Mariah discussion? It's been 2.5 weeks since I launched it and notified all of the contributors and there's hardly been any comment. I'm also going to notify the other editors I pinged who have been active since July 3. –Chase (talk / contribs) 04:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

FA comment

Hello WikiRedactor. If you have some spare time these days, can you take a look at Megadeth, an FA candidate of mine? The review is here, so I'll be grateful if you can leave your comment/vote whether the article deserves to attain FA status. Cheers.--Retrohead (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Merge discussion

Hi WikiRedactor. A few days back, I had proposed that Body Language Live be merged into Money Can't Buy. Unfortunately, it is a rather obscure article and its talk page is rarely visited. I think it will never reach consensus at this rate. To add to that, I cannot wait for 30 days to make a bold merge since I've got the new article ready in my sandbox. I'm not aiming to canvas at all, but I hope you can review the proposal and give your opinion. Thanks! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for giving your input. By the way I made a suggestion on the Lana Del Ray album discussion that you pointed out to me --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

@WonderBoy1998: Ooh thank you, I'll go take a look! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:10, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Re: Electra Heart

Just a thank you (and congrats!) for your work on this article. Love the album! ----Another Believer _(Talk) 18:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Thanks so much, I appreciate it! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 05:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WreckingBallScreenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WreckingBallScreenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Electra Heart

Incredible job with your most recent FA, Electra Heart! And, shall we continue with Christina Aguilera? Seems like I am the only contributor recently. But if you are so busy with other projects, then it'll be alright. Simon (talk) 14:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

@HĐ: Thanks so much! My apologies about the Xtina article, for some reason I didn't get any pings from over there, I'll get to the article momentarily! WikiRedactor (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Love Club EP/archive1

Hey, if you are interested, would you please leave some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Love Club EP/archive1? Feel free to ignore this. Best, Simon (talk) 08:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Great news

Got some great news! WikiProject Shakira has a second good topic! Yup, Sale el Sol is now a good topic (here)! I am very happy, considering it had a good number of large articles and it took me nearly a year. This is great. WP:SHAKIRA is giving other projects a run for their money, at least when it comes to good topics. Thanks! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

@WonderBoy1998: Congratulations with the new GT! You've done great things for WikiProject Shakira, and it's very exciting that the public can see them too! WikiRedactor (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Shakira discography FL

Hey WikiRedactor! Whenever you have time, consider commenting on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Shakira discography/archive1. This can be a milestone. Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

A user reverted my edits on the page and restored the old version. Please look at the new version --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Comments have been addressed. Thanks for the input --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikicup semifinalists interview request

As you may know, I write for the Signpost, basically Wikipedia's newsletter. I'd like to do a feature on the semifinalists, would you be willing to provide, say, 250 to 500 words saying: (1.) Why did you join the Wikicup? (2.) What you you hope to get out of it? and (3.) Which of your contributions to the Wikicup are your favourites?

Not quite sure how I'll order them - I'll probably make the ed17 decide, as, you know, Conflict of Interest: I am a semifinalist. I'd imagine point order or alphabetical or the like.

Can you please reply at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-07-30/Wikicup#WikiRedactor? Thanks! Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 00:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Last-minute polishing

WikiRedactor, I'm taking Katy Perry to FAC tomorrow. If all goes well, she'll reach FA in time to be "Today's Featured Article" for her 30th birthday this upcoming October 25th! Any pre-FAC suggestions you have should be left on her talk page. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 20:21, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Here is her FAC. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 21:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Iggy Azalea discography

Hey WikiRedactor, would you mind leaving some comments here? Thanks, Simon (talk) 09:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Categories for discussion

Hi, I closed Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 July 5#Category:Albums produced by Mike WiLL Made It with no action, as you had not tagged the category page. The latter is necessary so that interested editors can find out that the discussion is taking place.

If you find that the instructions at WP:CFD are not clear, please let me know which parts have a problem.

As the article has not been renamed, you could make a Speedy nomination to rename the category to match it (justification = C2D), which has already happened with the other category that you nominated on July 5. – Fayenatic London 13:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I've renamed that one now, but without the hyphen. – Fayenatic London 18:44, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Someone Else (Miley Cyrus song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Someone Else (Miley Cyrus song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of My love is love -- My love is love (talk) 16:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

TFA

Just wanna say congrats on Electra Heart being today's featured article, you really did well on that :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I second this. Congrats! pedro | talk 23:07, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Someone Else (Miley Cyrus song)

The article Someone Else (Miley Cyrus song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Someone Else (Miley Cyrus song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of My love is love -- My love is love (talk) 18:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj

I don't think Remy Ma and Foxy brown can be included as a beef, as naturally beef is between more than one party. Foxy made those comment and Nicki never responded and Remy made one comment in jest which was the end of that, too, with no comments from Minaj. It seems like unnecessary KB that can just be taken out entirely. Kane (talk) 23:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

@KaneZolanski: Good point, I'll remove Remy. Thanks so much for helping get this revamping process moving! WikiRedactor (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

It's fine! The article was on the verge of reassessment, It needed to be revamped. I am going to start looking for more information to be included in the 2014 section, considering Minaj is currently into her era it is rather brief and doesn't exactly include a rounded encyclopaedic summary of Minaj's year thus far. If you need any help or have any queries just give me a shout. Kane (talk) 18:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

@KaneZolanski: Yes it would be great to get more information for 2014, I look forward to working together and getting this article back on track! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nicki Minaj page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I stumbled upon your sandbox and saw that you had the foresight to start the article for Miley's 5th album already! You deserve this for your hard work on Miley related articles! Good job! :) CyrockingSmiler (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

@CyrockingSmiler: Thank you! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Successful FA

Thanks to your help, Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson is now a featured article :'D! Couldn't have done it without you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Congratulations! I'm very happy to see all of your hard work being recognized! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

I myself am stoked! Now to get her as TFA this upcoming October 25th..... Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Yes it will be awesome to have the article as the TFA on her birthday! If for whatever reason that date doesn't work out, you could pick October 18/22 because it will have been a year since Prism was released. WikiRedactor (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Good back-up ideas :), though I'm hoping for her birthday. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Yes I'm sure that you'll make sure the request is in on time, and that there is a good chance that the article will on the front page for the big 3-0! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Katy Perry was successful, she shall be TFA for the big 3-0! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Congratulations! I'm very happy to see all of your hard work being recognized(: WikiRedactor (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

I am too :D Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Love Money Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Money Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Money Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of My Darlin' for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Darlin' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Darlin' until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of On My Own (Miley Cyrus song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On My Own (Miley Cyrus song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On My Own (Miley Cyrus song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 20:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 August newsletter

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
2. Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
3. Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
4. Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
5. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
6. 12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
7. Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
8. Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Matty.007 (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), WikiRedactor (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), Yellow Evan (submissions), Prism (submissions) and Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:FaceTime Mac iOS.png

Thanks for uploading File:FaceTime Mac iOS.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 08:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Small favour

Hey WikiRedactor, how's work going? If you're not too busy, can you do me a favour by uploading the following music files from YouTube?

• File:She-Wolf.ogg from here Timing: 1:02–1:24 (or 1:01–1:23, not sure when exactly the chorus starts and ends)
• File:Set the World Afire.ogg from here Timing: 2:48–3:18 (might be 2:49–3:19, depends on the verse)

The songs are from Cryptic Writings and So Far, So Good... So What!, if you need additional information for the rationale. Thanks in advance.--Retrohead (talk) 11:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

@Retrohead: So sorry for the late response, the files are now uploaded! WikiRedactor (talk) 20:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SimonMallsLogo2014.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SimonMallsLogo2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 September newsletter

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The Real Housewives

For the "Real Housewives" Wikipedia pages, please do not put all the housewives under one list. They separated by "Current" and "Former" by season for a reason! Thank you! -Mgaisser123

For the "Real Housewives" Wikipedia pages, please stop messing with the table for the "Timeline of Housewives" and current cast list. It is kept in a specific organized fashion to make it easier for readers. It's getting really annoying. -Mgaisser123

@Mgaisser123: I purposely made a compromise that I thought everyone would be happy with, I'm not trying to be "annoying", I'm just trying to make things more effective. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the message!

May I also mention that you are changing the cast list around making it invalid. We have sources to confirm a different cast lineup for the future season. And therefore should be updated. And in my opinion, the older format for the tables looked better and was there for the longest time. Many just prefer that format over the one that you put in bc it wasn't changed and stayed that way. But again that's my opinion. I too hope we can work together without getting on each other's nerves and compromise. -Mgaisser123

@Mgaisser123: Can you take a look at the revision I made on The Real Housewives of Orange County? The section for recurring cast members is back, although with the newer color codes. How do you feel about this? WikiRedactor (talk) 20:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

I like the separate section for recurring. Now should the former section be dedicated only to ones that were once Main Housewives and nothing else? Should the recurring section be dedicated only to ones that were recurring and nothing else? Or should we split the recurring section into current recurring and former recurring? I think we should. -Mgaisser123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgaisser123 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

@Mgaisser123: I like the idea of keeping the recurring section for the women that were never main housewives and leaving the former section for women that were main housewives at some point. It seems like it would pretty much be the original timeline, just with some new colors. Should I make the changes on all the articles so you can see how it would look with all the different cast situations? WikiRedactor (talk) 20:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Right I agree with everything you just wrote. But I think we should have a Current Recurring and Former Recurring section for the women that were never Main Housewives. -Mgaisser123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgaisser123 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

@Mgaisser123: That sounds good to me, I'll go ahead and make those revisions across all the articles! Thanks so much for your input WikiRedactor (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Great! Your welcome! Glad we came to an agreement-Mgaisser123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgaisser123 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

• As a result of the RfC that you posted at WT:TV I made some recommendations and edited the table at The Real Housewives of Orange County to demonstrate those recommendations.[1] They've since been reverted by Acpurdy without explanation so I've asked for an explanation on his talk page. Looking around I can't find evidence of any attempt to discuss this matter with him. Have you or Mgaisser123 attempted to discuss the tables with him? --AussieLegend (✉) 16:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

I think we better stop with the tables. It keeps on getting changed everyday and it's just not worth it. Plus I think it's a little better now. -Mgaisser123

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello WikiRedactor:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

WikiCup award

Awarded to WikiRedactor for participating in the 2014 WikiCup. J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 21:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014: The results

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

• Godot13 (submissions) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
• Casliber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
• Czar (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
• Sturmvogel 66 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• 12george1 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• ChrisGualtieri (submissions) wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
• Caponer (submissions) wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
• Figureskatingfan (submissions) wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Justin Timberlake discography

Hi WikiRedactor! Can I please get get your input here regarding the list? I would be grateful. :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 20:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Heart Wants What It Wants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim James. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Selena Gomez discography section

While your edits definitely comply with WP:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines#Discography section, it's probably worth looking at the talk page for why you were previously reverted. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Funny you mention that because I stumbled across that discussion like two seconds after I made my most recent edit. Sorry for the trouble, I'll let whatever future revision made stand hahaha WikiRedactor (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

No worries, there wasn't any trouble. I personally agree with your edits, just don't know if they'll stand. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Hahaha I wonder if Selena knows the trouble that the (pretty much non-existent) Scene has caused for things like this! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

XD I don't think there'd be so much conflict if she had released more solo albums :P Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: That's a good point lol because no other singer seems to have this problem on their pages WikiRedactor (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Good Girl Gone Bad FAC

I would be very happy to see your input on the FAC, thanks in advance. :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 16:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)