I want to keep the discussions in one place. If you leave a comment here for me, I will probably answer it on this page - which is my talk page so that the discussion remains in one place in its entirety.
I do not simply delete discussions. I submit to the archive.
KumarVenati, Reddy hasn't been officially elected yet, although news coverage from India suggests that he and the other three YSR Congress Party nominees for Andhra Pradesh will all win their seats. However, Vivek ji123 was wrong to nominate this for speedy deletion as "an article about a real person that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." It most certainly did credibly indicate the subject's importance. Another editor has removed the speedy deletion tag. Vivek ji123, can you please explain why you nominated this article for speedy deletion. Your actions indicate that you do not have an understanding of the speedy deletion criteria and should not be tagging articles for it until you do. Voceditenore (talk) 09:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Concerning your assertion here, you are definitely not ready to be a pending changes reviewer. Your activities patrolling new pages show multiple problems. For example:
Alla Ayodhya Rami Reddy should not have been tagged for speedy deletion. See my above comments.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martina Stoessel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The subject almost certainly satisfies biographical notability, but this draft does not contain enough information to warrant a separate article at this time. It also has tone and style issues. Please expand with additional sources and information, and copy-edit, and resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunny Hindustani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sunny Hindustani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Vivek ji123!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran (talk)23:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran (talk)23:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I recently added an information in Motu Patlu wikipedia page which is inverted by you. I know it's my fault
. I'm from a state board school so my English isn't that good . So l can't explain about the latest version of Motu Patlu . So l have a request to you to watch Motu Patlu within 5 days from now at 6:30 to 7 pm so that you can compare the latest version to the old one and you can add the new information on Motu Patlu's wikipedia page in my place. Thank you. Suprabha Chanda (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You are not a pending changes reviewer and should stay strictly away from such articles. You are making reverts without any apparent knowledge of what you are reverting and why. Your command of written English is poor. You do not have an established record of successful article creation and have had multiple articles and drafts deleted. You must stop repeatedly asking for this right. You are not ready for it. You have been told repeatedly that you are not ready for it. You are wasting administrators' time. You are also wasting the time of real pending changes reviewers with your inappropriate reversions. Also, you must remove the box from your user page which falsely claims that you are a pending changes reviewer. You do not have that right and keeping that box on you user page is deceitful. This is your last warning. If you continue with this behaviour, I will bring it to the Administrators' Noticeboard. Voceditenore (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If Vivek ji123 does ask for an unblock, I would suggest it be contingent on a 6 month ban on reverting as a minimum (0RR), as that is why they are blocked. Perhaps it is a language barrier, but this is the reason for the block, roughly; disruptive editing via reverting sourced material without discussion. They can use the talk page and argue for reverting by someone else. Dennis Brown - 2¢11:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Nation Builders, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Fountain (poem), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
