G13 stale draftsEdit

Hello, Squeeps10,

You are tagging stale drafts CSD G13 before they are eligible. Check the edit history for the last edit. They are not eligible until they have been unedited for six months, not any sooner. Please do not be over-eager. It benefits no one to jump the gun. If a draft is eligible on Nov. 10, 2020 12:34 UTC do not tag it at Nov. 10, 2020 11:54 UTC. Being patient is better than having an admin coming to your talk page to scold you! There is no hurry to delete old drafts. We used to just do them all, once a day. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

@Liz: Apologies, I had forgotten I had set Wikipedia to display my local time rather than UTC, so I was operating on the assumption those times were being displayed in UTC. Thanks for the reminder, won't happen again. Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 01:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Though, as an addendum, the chances that someone who has not edited a draft in six months (and more often than not has not edited Wikipedia at all in six months) will return to their draft in the ten minute timespan between G13 tagging and official G13 eligibility is slim-to-none. You are technically correct, however. --Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 01:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
And according to User:Squeeps10/on G13, it's your custom to tag stale drafts an hour before they reach G13 eligibility? I hope this reflects your philosophy when you were a new editor and not currently. As we have discussed today over several talk pages, it is unwise to tag drafts too early. Some admins do not check tagged pages before they delete them, they assume they are tagged correctly. And I hope you change your essay to comply with common practice. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Liz, I have reworded the offending part of the essay. I'm surprised you found it, it must've taken some hunting. --SqueePs10 TalkMy edits 03:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

WP:VPMEdit

Hi. Would it be possible to reword your recent comment at WP:VPM to be more accurate and civil? The Community Tech team has a decent record getting to the top few suggestions (2020, 2019), and I doubt using that moniker for the foundation strengthens the argument. Thanks. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Enterprisey, done. You have to admit the nickname was kinda funny though. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 07:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Modern Rogue (November 22)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 
Hello, Squeeps10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

VPI discussion "Creation of a CSD criteria for articles and drafts with no encyclopedic value" movedEdit

Hey there, just a small heads-up, I moved the discussion you initiated to Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Creation of a CSD criteria for articles and drafts with no encyclopedic value which is the proper venue for such discussions. Regards SoWhy 17:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the heads up SoWhy. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 19:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Malinda Kathleen Reese - draftEdit

Hi, thanks for your recent edits on Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese! I notice you’ve put it on your list of drafts you’re working on- anything that can help get the article in shape for a successful review is very much appreciated! Mojo0306 (talk) 10:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Mojo0606, I'm not much of a writer, but I'll do what I can! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 21:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Wrong ping, I meant Mojo0306. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 21:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Much appreciated! Mojo0306 (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Yup, let me know if there's anything else I can do for you User:Mojo0306! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 22:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
As you have probably seen, the article was rejected on the basis of apparent lack of notability. If there are any reliable sources out there that I haven’t included in the article that help to build further notability, then they would be most welcome! Mojo0306 (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
I'll have a look when I get a chance. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 23:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for resubmitting for review! Hopefully it’ll be accepted this time! Mojo0306 (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Hopefully! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 17:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Refdesk replyEdit

Hi, I've seen your answer at WP:RDS regarding UV radiation! Thanks! On the mentioned site of FDA I've also noticed a sentence re the "limited published data" regarding the subject. How can this aspect be dealed with to get more info from ongoing research projects and testing labs?--86.124.193.84 (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm not the most qualified person to ask, I'd check with the refdesk again. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 02:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Re the ping, I do not quite understand how it works.--86.124.193.84 (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
You just type {{u|Example}}, replacing "Example" with the username of the person you want to ping. Since you're editing under an IP address, not an account, you can't be pinged, but I believe you can ping other people. If you want to receive pings, you'll have to create an account. Let me know if you have any more questions. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 17:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malinda Kathleen Reese (January 10)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese has a new commentEdit

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)Edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Redesigning the featured, good, and article assessment icons. Pbrks (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

"Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 24#Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)