Vickytnz

Vickytnz, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Vickytnz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating You Oughta Be in Love, Vickytnz!

Wikipedia editor TheChampionMan1234 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

great contributing!

To reply, leave a comment on TheChampionMan1234's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great contributing! thanks! any concern come to my talkpage and leave me a message, don't forget to sign by entering 4 ~ characters at the end of your message! TheChampionMan1234 00:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

As TCM said, great contributing! Keep it up - Theopolisme 02:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Vickytnz! Thank you for your contributions. I am Go Phightins! and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Go Phightins! (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

I just saw your newest page regarding the Cool Bananas Album, came to your talk, an noticed you hadn't been formally welcomed. Well, welcome! If you have any questions, let me know. Go Phightins! (talk) 14:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vickytnz. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by  --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Proposed deletion of Top 100 New Zealand Songs of All Time

The article Top 100 New Zealand Songs of All Time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a list that a) already exists elsewhere online, and b) implies that is the "definitive" Top 100 New Zealand Songs of All Time -- a falsity. No reason to include this list on-wiki -- practically just a big ad for "Nature's Best" -- an external link is fine.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theopolisme 23:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Fair call on the name being inappropriate, could change that to be related to Nature's Best. The problem is that there is no place online that officially has it (I'll be damned if I can find it on APRA, the only two listings are a personal blog and a Christchurch library!). It's frequently referred to in relation to songs as well, which makes checking difficult (e.g. how do you tell a song was voted #33 when the track listing on Nature's Best 2 here starts from 1 again? Or what of interviewers saying that Dave Dobbyn contributed to 10% of the list?) I could merge it in with the main article, but need to figure out how to do it best. The list is separate from the CDs as far as I know.

Vickytnz (talk) 23:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Hm - so if it's not online, where might you have found it? Theopolisme 23:28, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

It was available on the DVD release (not quite sure how to cite it), and has been put up by the Christchurch library on their site and one person on their own personal site, but not in any format that's of any real use. You can mash it together from the listings of the 3 CDs as well, but it's not easy. I could drop it at the bottom of the main article, but the Top 100 vote does exist independently of the CDs. Vickytnz (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm off to dinner now - will be back with some insightful commentary momentarily. Theopolisme 23:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Cool. The primary issue is that the Nature's Best page, for all it says about the 100 songs, never actually says what they are or links to anything with it (none of the citations have anything, for the reasons I gave above)! That was why I set the list up. Vickytnz (talk) 23:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Could I make the article the APRA 100 New Zealand Songs of all Time, move some of the information from the selection process over to that, and then allow Nature's Best to be a more pure description of the album? Vickytnz (talk) 23:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Please rename the article to APRA Top 100 New Zealand Songs, I've found an Australian equivalent on the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APRA_Top_30_Australian_songs so it makes sense to align it with that. Vickytnz (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and I've changed the copy to be more about the voting and made the list less obviously Nature's Best! Vickytnz (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Good work! Let me know if there's ever anything else I can help with. Theopolisme 21:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Never mind, done it :) I've removed the deletion notice as I believe I've addressed it (though obv if you check and feel it's not the case then flag it). Vickytnz (talk) 01:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vickytnz. You have new messages at Braincricket's talk page.
Message added 23:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Braincricket (talk) 23:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Aussie women

Hi Vickytnz. I saw your comment over at the Ada Lovelace Day page and wanted to point you to Victorian Honour Roll of Women which has a number of engineers and scientists. Cheers, Gobōnobō ^{+ c} 14:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Cool, will do a bit of work on the Jeremijenko page (needs it anyhow) and then look at those. Will have to investigate as to whether there's an NZ equivalent! Vickytnz (talk) 14:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vickytnz. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Pratyya ^(Hello!) 16:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Vickytnz! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Feel free to drop by our website, make a profile and see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Overload (convention) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Overload (convention), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Overload (convention) was accepted

Overload (convention), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James^x12345 10:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Wikipedia Adventure

Hi Vickytnz! I'm not involved in the develoment of this project but I was recently going through some of the comments to see how the project is coming along. I particularly appreciated what you had to say and I hope the developers will take note. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean-Dominique Bauby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blanka Amezkua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Contacting Editors from the Ada Lovelace Editathons

Hi Vickytnz,

I hope you don’t mind me contacting you via your talk page. I’m a new Editor to Wikipedia, part of a small research team based at the University of Birmingham in the UK. I’m getting in touch as we’re trying to contact all the Editors who were involved in the Ada Lovelace Editathons in Oxford or London. If you have been, or still are, involved in editing, whatever the scale of your involvement, we would be very grateful for the opportunity to talk to you about your experiences. In the first instance, we’ve set up a short (10 minute) survey, which you can access via my User Talk Pages. If you are interested in helping with our research project, please can you drop me a line?

Thanks, RuthPage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vickytnz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vickytnz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Overload convention logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Overload convention logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)