User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars/Archive 3

Coast to Coast (McDonald's Jazz Band LP)

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars,

I think the deletion tag should be reconsidered at this point in time:

Coast to Coast (McDonald's Jazz Band LP)

Please relook at this page, I have been able to hunt down peer review information that was deemed vital for keeping the article.

On a different subject...learned a trick in the process for anyone who cannot get the text for a Google book search (more text or the full text of an article) when it only offers partial or no text.

Thanks, Jcooper1 (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lennonwall.jpg

Re File:Lennonwall.jpg - category is to be sure it will automatically go into the proper place when moved to Commons. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Indian Football Templates

Ya Sure. That is a great idea. As the information becomes available I will make those articles. Thank you for the suggestion and it actually also saves me time now because I won't have to create templates for the other teams. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually I have just checked my watchlist and I am now getting angry. Why did you move the categories. I understand the Templates but moving the categories is not right. The category is still being used and if it is orphaned it will get forced deleted unlike the templates. I am sorry but I will put back the categories but the template suggestion you gave me stands. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha I see your point. I will remove the categories with the one article in it but there were some with the article and picture logo so I will keep those. You are right that I do to much pre-work. I am a bit of an overachiever when it comes to wikipedia. lol --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. It is tempting because I am worried because my thoughts were that maybe I could start these new pages for these football clubs and make them perfect unlike the ones that are currently in existence because those are tough to revamp. Plus they get vandalized a lot. Either way it does not matter. Thank you anyway. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I will do that later when I have time. Thanks for the tips. I will definitely use them. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 01:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:2nd-millennium establishments in Foo

Please don't clear categories out of process, like you did here. We don't delete categories by emptying them; in stead, we have a process to discuss deelting categories, called WP:Categories for discussion. If you think these categories should be deleted, feel free to nominate them accoring to the instructions on that page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Demon Sword

Hi, I noticed you were helping with some images on that article (air, ground and title). I am hoping perhaps you could keep an eye on it, because I noticed somebody removed the images and a bot almost deleted them. I reverted the delete tag they added, but people keep removing information about the video game for some reason. Is there possibly room on your watch list? I'm worried I might miss not notice any further deletion-vandalism and hope to find allies to preserve classic NES game articles. Y12J (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Gremlins

Category:Gremlins, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Can we discuss our issues here?

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, I think we need to back up a little bit and start over. Let me first appologise. As a compromise, how about having both the template and succession boxes? I was about to suggest this, but our conversation derrailed somewhere. Please don't do any edits. Just respond here? Thank-you. Argolin (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

More apologies... I assumed you were online. I thought you had just answered the post "I don't get how Canadian charts were managed" and read my post here. So Nielsen = Billboard? The Canadian Singles Chart doesn't actually spell that out. Now don't laugh too hard at me. Maybe a little, I am. :) I can't speak for all Canadians, but no one I knew ever took the Billboard charts seriously. Perhaps it was youth and hating Top 40 AM music. The RPM charts were all that mattered. I'll go now... I'm working on years in Canadian music. Have a read 1964 in Canadian music. There's no chart information as anything that is placed there is incomplete. I do hope to hear from you soon. Argolin (talk) 03:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't know anything about the Canadian Singles Chart as referenced in Wikipedia. I was just answering the question and he hadn't received conflicting information. Based on what I read, it seems to only be a sales chart for physical singles. I would think that as long as their was an RPM chart that should be considered the official Canada ranking that's cited.

As for the succession boxes, I still don't see a need for both a template and boxes because it is redundant navigation. I do agree with you that the current is unappealing, and it should be cleaned up or made obsolete by creating separate navbox templates for each set of chart lists. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 07:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm glad that you agree with me on the Billboard charts. I'll modify the WP:LEAD section of the charts I've created to reflect that "this RPM chart is the official Canadian ranking." I was trying to expand on the poor one sentence leads I've seen so far. Thank-you.

There are more than one or two (RPM singles and album charts) missing from wikipedia. That's why you, me and everyone else cannot state definitively the Top Charted Hits in Canada (1964-2000). It seems that it is the Canadian music project's dirty little secret. All of us know about it; all of us say yes we should do something about it. It's a big job. RPM published more than 10,637 charts in Canada. I started with citing the List of RPM number-one singles of 1964. That's all I did: cite it. I don't really agree with the "Weeks on Top" column. Isn't that original research? I moved on and created (what I thought were missing charts) the 1995 & List of RPM number-one alternative rock singles of 1996. To my amazement, another user created the chart with all years at List of RPM Rock/Alternative number-one singles. The one I created is a little more detailed (see notes 1 & 5 in the article). I've also listed the related chart "Year End Alternative ~ Top 50". This singles chart is also missing. I would like to create it, but you and I are having format issues. Please feel free to post something at our discussion page.

It makes me very sad that you're not willing to give even a centimetre on the succession boxes. I really thought my compromise (and apology) would be satisfactory to a placement of both a template and succession box. Are we not all volunteers to wikipedia? I don't belive it to be duplicate naviagtion. The succession boxes help clairfy years in which RPM did not publish a chart. One example of this is the List of RPM number-one dance singles. I, along with the Canadian music project know that the RPM charts are not complete. There is no ill will in the following: is it not premature to state that succession boxes are uneccesary given that there are so many RPM charts still missing? I'm moving on from 1964 in Canadian music. I really thought I could help with the RPM top singles/albums by year.

Two things I must ask of you Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. One is not to rush to answer. Please consider your answer and follow the links (including external) that I've provided. Two is to place the {{Talkback}} template when you've replied. Argolin (talk) 04:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Graffiti My Soul

Thank you for reassessing this. -- Trevj (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Sucker M.C.'s

Can you explain this edit to me.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

You could have just said that X is a great-grandparent category of Y. Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

UK number ones

That was my opinion before but I then had another look at the US yearly lists. They are really well referenced for every number-one whereas it would be impractical for a decade list to put in so many references. I now believe the UK and US should have the same level of article coverage. 03md 05:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Catalog songs in the top ten

I thought about it and I understand what you mean by "I Will Always Love You"'s unrelated chart runs, but wouldn't the song's peak/peak date still be from its original run? Billboard doesn't distinguish between separate runs, unless I'm mistaken.--Wikipeep 494 (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I think this is a unique situation. It's definitely a re-entry, but it's so different than a song debuting on a chart, falling off and re-entering all within a few weeks time. The best example of this, of course, has to be "The Twist", which had two different runs at No. 1 over a year apart. On the 50th Anniversary list of number ones (see here), Billboard lists "The Twist" twice, but "The Sounds of Silence", which fell to No. 2 and rebounded to the top a week later, is only listed once. If you have any of Joel Whitburn's books, he does distinguish between separate peaks for re-entries on separate runs (such as "Red Red Wine" and "Bohemian Rhapsody", although these may be bad examples as they did reach new peaks on their latter runs.). While you may want present it in a different manner, I think the info as presented for "I Will Always Love You" seems adequate: 2012 entry date with cumulative number of weeks in top 10 along with a footnote. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

What is the problem with this edit?

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars what is the problem with this edit? Argolin (talk) 04:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

It's not a recognized template. I've been trying to revert them all for years. If it was instructed to use in WP:ALBUMS, I'd be all for it, but the author of the template often tries to create things without notifying projects to implement it. He's never even used it himself since January 2011 and very few others even know about it. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 04:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

So the problem is that it has not been authorised by the Category project or Albums project?Argolin (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes. Since all that was done in some bot addition of the template in the creation of these categories, none have been default sorted (if needed) and no other genre/nationality categories have been added. Often only one or two albums have been added when the artists has more than that, so as I have been doing this maintenance, I've always reverted back to the simpler Category:Albums by artist. Only around 1000 to go. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 05:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Why not get authorisation to use it from the Albums project? Or flag it for deletion and have a bot correct the 1000? Argolin (talk) 05:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

A bot won't sort a category such as Category:Gavin Rossdale albums with {{DEFAULTSORT:Rossdale, Gavin}} or add additional appropriate categories like Category:Alternative rock albums by American artists. And if a bot cleared this out, I'd never find which ones need to be checked and completed. --05:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

A bot for the replacement of category by artist. Would it not be easier to get it officially approved?

In the future, instead of a mass revision to my edits, would you mind posting to my talk page? I may even help, I'll probably have a list from which I'm working from. Does that sound ok? Argolin (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Sure. These ones I found just going through the list I use. Just a coincidence that you and I meet again like that. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Yup lol. I'm including a default sort even if it is technically not required. Do you do the same? Argolin (talk) 06:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Nah, just last names, articles (a, an, the), and I guess capitalization is needed because "of" and "Of" get sorted differently. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 06:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you start? I ask 'cause I'll often grab an albums cat and copy the synatax to use on the new one I'm creating. There's been a few musician album cat's created without it. It'll remind you/me everyone else to include it on new ones. Argolin (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

If it doesn't have to be, I'd prefer not to. I'll do the same by copying syntax from another category, but I'll still remove the sort template after I paste it in if it's not necessary to have it. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

I really didn't know how to stylize the info box for Lollipop Luxury since the song came out twice as singles, so I was trying to be clever with it since there isn't enough information on both of the songs to do two separate info boxes. Is what I did just fine? I'm kinda worried. Devin Davis (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poland Digital Songs

With this precedent, you should be able to mass nominate a bunch of others :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 00:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Sergio Franchi

Why have you removed the Sergio Franchi templates on the three related pages? This is not exactly in the protocol that Wikipedia encourages. Instead of removing with "not done right" tag, you might have left a positive suggestion for improvement on the article pages, or my own user page as to what was incorrect. Instead you left no comments on any of the pages, and just arbitrarily removed them!Cathlec (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. You said that after 6 months of editing I should have noticed that no one put a musicians template directly into an article. For your information, these articles about Sergio Franchi are the first that I have done, and I have never created a Musician's template before. I read some information but could not get exact directions from the help pages. No one who responded to my asking for help in how to create the template, so I went to a senior editor and asked for help. I followed his advice, copied another template into my Sandbox, and worked out how to create. What you have said to me is new. You say that I cannot put anything into the template that does not have a separate article unto itself! Well..that has been in my plans to create Wiki pages for all of Franchi's albums and notable songs. However, I did not know I needed to do those tasks before creating the template. Just for my own edification, where in the Wikipedia Help are the directions for creating a template (I couldn't find) and for cross-checking your information. And please, in the future, please give me a heads-up before arbitrarily deleting my editing! By the way, why do you not have a User page? CatherineCathlec (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

After reviewing what you have told me, I went back to a musician's discography and clearly saw that the template in question was a "Navigational Box." I did not see that before, and was looking for how to use Category:American musicians template. Very confusing to me for a while. Thanks for the advice, but it does get my "Irish" up when someone deletes a lot of hard work with no explanation on any related pages.Cathlec (talk) 01:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

And I prefer someone learning how to do something before they try to do it. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I want you to know that the instructions you have given me here, on my talk page, and in the related articles have greatly improved my editing skills and the articles. As for learning before doing, I thought that I had received correct advice on how to proceed. Thanks again, CatherineCathlec (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

New WikiProject Jazz guy says thank you :)

I just wanted to thank you for all the work you've put into reviewing/fixing all my new jazz articles (and templates, and categories...) for Michael Franks, among others. I'm learning a lot, and appreciate your stewardship (is that the word I'm looking for?) towards a long time reader, but relatively new contributor.

Cheers :) --Ruben (talk)

Greece Digital Songs

Seems to be a hoax. The Billboard links make no mention of a Greece Digital Songs chart, so I've tagged it as G3. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Questions about an archived discussion

Having rolled out templates on episodes (e.g. "The Good Son" (Frasier) and "Pilot" (The Cosby Show)), I am reconsidering an archived discussion about templates on season episodes: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Archive_14#Adding_seasons_to_award_winners. Consider The West Wing (season 1). It seems to me that it would be helpful if that article included {{EmmyAward DramaSeries 1976–2000}}, {{ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVDrama 2000–2009}}, {{GoldenGlobeTVDrama 1990–2009}}. Although the series won the award in a sense, all seven seasons did not win the 2000 awards. The 2000 awards were won mostly by season 1 and partly by season 2 because the awards were based on episodes between certain dates. Explain to me again why season 1 should not have these templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

I am trying to understand your original comments and understand them. Am I correct in understanding that you feel if a show wins one of these awards in its 7th season that the award is based on the cumulative theatrical presentation over the 7 seasons and not the year of the award?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Most 'shows by season' are lists of the episodes that aired for a particular show in a particular TV season. Season episode lists only exist because it would be too much to include in the main article. The articles about the shows themselves are at The West Wing, Cheers; i.e. the shows that won the awards.

That was probably my reasoning at the time, but do what you want with the templates. I really don't care anymore. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your consent. I have to understand what the other discussants were thinking. I understand that season articles are often nothing more than episode lists. However, some of these articles are substantive quality season articles. See Wikipedia:Good_articles/Arts#Theatre.2C_film_and_drama and Wikipedia:FA#Media. If wikipedians are spending their time wisely, some of these articles are the critically acclaimed ones that may benefit from a revamp. I will talk to some others and then consider revising the templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

FYI, I have almost finished comedy. I think it looks O.K., especially on these four articles that swept the awards: Ally McBeal (season 2), 30 Rock (season 2), 30 Rock (season 3), & Modern Family (season 2).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

All done. Drama had a few more sweeps The West Wing (season 1), The West Wing (season 2), and Lost (season 1) as well as several that we did not have articles for.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

• FYI, there is now an effort to get some of the important episode and season articles in the reformatted templates created. You may want to get involved at Wikipedia:Television_episodes#Important_articles_to_be_created.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Request for comments

Hello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Thanks.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Redirects

Please review Several of your recent edits are fine (e.g.) but at least one took out Category:Redirects from albums. I'm looking through your edits and I'd appreciate you doing the same. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually There are a lot--e.g.. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh So {{R from album}} includes Category:Printworthy redirects even though it shouldn't (e.g.)--I'll have to look through the transclusions of this. Ugh. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Japanese idol groups, boy bands, and girl groups

Please stop removing categories from Japanese idol groups. Not all girl groups or boy bands are idol groups and vice versa. You've deleted one of 2 categories from hundreds of pages. If it's possible, please change it all back. Yes, most groups will be in 2 categories (e.g. Japanese girl groups and Japanese idol groups). But there are exceptions. Actually, "girl group" is a Western term and "idol group" is a Japanese term. You see, there's not such category as Category:Girl groups in the Japanese Wikipedia, articles are included in the category from the Western point of view. Moscowconnection (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

My basis for the changes was based on how the category was structured at the time. I'm actually the one who correctly removed Category:Idol groups from Category:Girl groups and Category:Boy bands back in December. The one who added idol groups as a parent category to Category:Japanese girl groups and Category:Japanese boy bands, thus creating the erroneous category tree, is User:tsuchiya Hikaru (see here and here), yet I see no similar warning on his page. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you are absolutely right! It looked like all girl groups and boy bands were idol groups. Thank you! :) And I already corrected everything yesterday, there weren't too many pages with the idol groups category removed, after all, maybe 10 or 20. Moscowconnection (talk) 03:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Delinking template

Please explain What's the rationale for this edit? Please respond on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah That makes sense. Have you considered substituting where there aren't redlinks? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

For what it's worth This conversation continued at my talk with another interested editor--I don't know if you watch my page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 1998

Who do I go to about getting that page set up? I noticed that all the pages up to 1999 are set up. Is 1998 going to be set up? If so, where do I get the data for it? Arjoccolenty (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

So you aren't going to make the list? Personally I find it easier especially when I try to find the peak dates of songs and its less annoying then having to use Billboard.com. Most of the songs aren't even on there if they are really old and I was hoping somebody could put it up for me so that it would be the same as the other pages. Arjoccolenty (talk) 21:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Annual "conference" navboxes

Such as {{2012 America East men's soccer standings}}..

I'm seeing a lot of these coming for deletion, and I'm also seeing more being created Category:2010–11 AIHL standings templates for example. Might be worthwhile trying to get some guidelines included in WikiProject Sports. Rich Farmbrough, 15:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC).

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 March 21#Albums by certification

Any reason you did not bundle Category:Singles by certification in the same proposal? --Muhandes (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination list was big enough as it was. I can follow up with that pending the outcome of th current CfD. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nice work on the lists of album certifications. Of course, the really hard one would be the RIAA list, since a previous CfD removed the categories I made by number of Platinum awards. I suppose I can temporarily redo it as hidden categories if you intend to have a go at it, just let me know. I'm a bit worried about the sourcing of these lists and how we make sure editors don't just add their pet albums, although one may say it is no worse than the categories. --Muhandes (talk) 07:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

The RIAA certification list might take a while and may need separate pages for Gold and Platinum certifications and List of best-selling albums in the United States covers the Diamond level. Since I'm creating these lists from only what has been categorized, most of them do seem to have proper sources for their certifications and can be added in from the individual album articles as time allows. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 14:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Belfast Confetti

Hi, it looks like we were trying to do the same thing at the same time. Belfast Confetti is all messed up because in October 2010 an editor blanked the page about the poem and replaced it with info about the album. I'm trying to get the edit histories into the correct locations, so please do not edit either page for a bit. Thanks J04n(talk page) 00:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem. I thought some weird stuff was happening there. I'll let you do what you need to do. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

All set, that was tricky! J04n(talk page) 00:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

A Year Without Rain (Deluxe Edition)

Hello, I wanted to talk to you about the page I've recently created and I see that you deleted it. I just wanted to tell you that it was a clear and complete article and I've found some information from sights but now its gone! If you want to talk to me sometime about this please visit my talk page! Have a nice day and I hope you get back with me soon! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RomeAntic14 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

RE: Venezuelan Record Report

Well I'll see what I can do, I'll develop an article on one my sandboxes and show it to you once it's complete to see if it's notable or not. Would that be alright? EDIT: Speaking of which, someone created an article National-Report for Colombian singles chart which got deleted because it's methodology was no stated by reliable sources. Makes me unsure whether the #1 singles in Colombia category should stay. Erick (talk) 21:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks and while I'm at it, would you like for an article for Monitor Latino to be made as well? I've been using that chart for the Mexican airplay after it was also approved at WP:CHARTS. Erick (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Here it is. Erick (talk) 02:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Just thought you should know, I have created the article Monitor Latino as well. Cheers, Erick (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Hangin' Up My Heart

Just letting you know that I declined your prod of Hangin' Up My Heart. I've added some information regarding the album's notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Understood. It was an oversight. I apologize

Won't happen again. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Frenetic Records albums

Category:Frenetic Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

The Accused

Where was the discussion concerning the pages you deleted? I'm referring to the pages on the albums by The Accused which you took down with no warning. These are stubs. That means they are works in progress. Why don't you do something constructive rather than just delete stuff? --Matt Westwood 18:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

They weren't deleted. Why don't you do something constructive and add meaningful content to them? Even stubs are required to meet notability requirements. These don't. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

They were deleted. They were replaced by a redirect to the band page, which is tantamount to deletion of their content. I found a link to another site where the albums were listed, is that not notable enough, or are they supposed to be mentioned in the Bible? --Matt Westwood 22:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

There was no content on the articles I redirected. There was a track list, which by itself, is not encyclopedic. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

A new template

Hey! What do you think about this new template? Please give me your feedback =) Regards. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 05:46, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Care

Hey! thanks for taking care of "Somebody That I Used to Know‎". Another issue: If succession boxes were deprecated (which i agree), why not open a RfC about them and delete the template to avoid future usage? --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 00:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Succession boxes have not been deprecated because they do serve some practical uses. Their use on song and album articles to represent a chronological listing of number ones has been contentious and even an RfC on the matter about a year and a half ago failed to fully resolve the matter. The implied consensus now is that the succession boxes are not added to new or existing articles for such songs and albums, but they are not being removed from articles that already had them prior to the RfC. The archive of that discussion can be found here, if you haven't seen it before. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, it was very useful. Regards. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 00:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

(Talk-page stalking) (and late) I thought these were discontinued a looong time ago. Perhaps there should be a second discussion about this, since the first was one and a half years ago. A person's opinion can change a lot in that period of time. Also, nobody uses them on new song articles, and occassionally I will remove them from a song article if I see it – was that wrong to do? :S Till I Go Home ^{talk stalk} 04:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

It Takes a Little Rain (To Make Love Grow)

Since you moved the page, I would appreciate if you'd weigh in here regarding its capitalization. Two different MOSes clash on whether or not "to" should be capitalized. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:26, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 03:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Playlist (album series)

Hello Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Playlist (album series), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Confusing edit

Please explain If you wouldn't mind sorting this out on my talk, can you tell me why you did this? Thanks as always. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 17:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 17:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Clean up and help

Hi the clean ups and help you did at this page are helpful thanks , one of your edits ended up being sort of detrimental as the page title is not italics anymore, I dont know how to fix the main title can you do this please at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Built_to_Last_(Hogan%27s_Heroes_album) it should be Built to Last(Hogan's Heroes album) the italics is not here anymore. thanks for your time.

...Ok...I Know Why.....one of the edits you did out of All the great ones Changed it. I dont understand all you did by any means , how about going over what you did to see when it happened. then youll know why and then you can use that knowledge to fix it. maybe you can just ask someone who knows and fix it. Obviously its not fixed until it is so thats the goal. it was fine in italics before. It must be simple im sure. I have no idea what to do except simply ask the person who made the changes. The whole rest of the clean up is great and helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.8.150 (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

OK SO THATS IT?, You edited some stuff ......some stuff you did helped and other stuff got rid of the italics can you direct me to someone who can rectify your mistake. If you dont know how to fix it. maybe we can all learn something. like how to fix it. its not good or professional looking or uniform with the bold Title not in Italics. thanks hit me off with a message so I can fix this. thanks here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Built_to_Last_(Hogan%27s_Heroes_album)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.114.64 (talk) 02:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

You're kind of a baby, aren't you? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 04:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

thanks so much ! You did it ! looks Great.....Ill ignore the "baby" comment no time for name-calling nonsense.....or people who think engaging like that will hurt feelings....LOL...Thanks to you for the fix

Intent was not to try to hurt anyone's feelings, just the fact that you came back two weeks later complaining about something I couldn't care less about and hadn't given a second thought to since. Content is so much more important that what the title looks like. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Its not "complaining" you should rectify what YOU do if something goes wrong. You should more than "care less" when something you do amongst "right" things, ....is Wrong. If you dont care enough about your own work maybe this isnt a good place for you. nor did I ask for your personal take on if you care. You Did something I came to you, no complaining unless you have a hard time with ownership. have a day. I havent give it a second thought of if I care, about who doesnt like being asked to fix their own mistake.....great we feel the same. thanks for finally coming through in over 2 weeks. ciao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.114.64 (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Laser Bitch

Hi. I've declined your WP:PROD of Laser Bitch because the article was previously deleted via PROD a few year's ago. If you'd like to pursue deletion of the article (and I agree that it doesn't meet notability guidelines), you'll need to take it to WP:AfD. Thanks, Whouk (talk) 12:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

C1 empty categories

Looking at upcoming C1 speedy deletions, I see that you tagged several empty categories. How do you find them? It seems that most multi-tagging is done by people who empty them inappropriately, but your contributions show me that you're doing everything rightly. Nyttend (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your response makes me think that I was unclear — in no way was I attempting to suggest that you were doing anything wrongly; I'm sorry for making you think that I was saying that. Thanks for the pointer to the database report; I've never seen it before. Nyttend (talk) 23:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Now Music Series

I didn't change the capitalization, I changed the display of grammar and the words used. Example Given: 'Wanna' is not the same thing as "want to". Specific example is "French Kissing in the U.S.A." is different than "French Kissin' in the USA", yet the capitalization of the words remained the same. Updating the pages to reflect the exact same way it was listed/posted on the original recording track information should be a good thing, as long as I did not change the links nor the insignificant minor changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebog1984 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Also, i took a look at the changes between yours and mine and the capitalization changes made (such as the 'a' in artist) were not done by me or at least not intentionally (and ergo not done manually/i did not type those changes in) so THOSE I'm all for, you know, being rectified or what have you. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebog1984 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Just double-checked my changes on the page via the page's history. I didn't change capitalization. It lists my changes, such as ( #Boris Gardiner : "I Want to Wake Up with You" ) to ( #Boris Gardiner : "I Wanna Wake Up With You" ). Thebog1984 (talk) 00:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I didn't notice the "want to" vs. "wanna". I did change "with" back to lower case as it should be. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

That's all fine and dandy. :) Thebog1984 (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Now that's what i call music 11 uk series track listing Thebog1984 (talk) 09:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

The Unthanks with Brighouse and Rastrick Brass Band

I think the article title should be italics, but I'm not sure how to achieve this. Can you help please? Thanks Headhitter (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't understand your answer. Headhitter (talk) 22:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2011 (U.S.)/archive1.
Message added 00:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron • ^{You Da One} 00:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Talk:Election Special#C?.
Message added Dan56 (talk) 17:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dan56 (talk) 17:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Swifty's talk page.
Message added 22:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^_^ Swifty*^talk 22:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Talk:We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together.
Message added 18:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^_^ Swifty*^talk & Toa Nidhiki05 18:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Talk:We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together.
Message added 19:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^_^ Swifty*^talk & Toa Nidhiki05 19:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, I'm Swifty. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Thank you. WT:CHARTS I noticed you also did this here as well, name calling and other personal attacks directed at editors is not allowed on Wikipedia. ^_^ Swifty*^talk 19:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not write disruptive messages on Talk:We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together. Should you do this again, you will be reported to the administrators and will be blocked.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  17:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Who are you? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Strike one

• Staretc., the blind are leading (on) the blind. Whoever Adam mugliston is, they don't seem to understand that there wasn't anything even remotely blockable on that talk page. Running to mommy (or ANI) won't change that a bit. Swifty, that warning template of yours is ridiculous. You don't template the regulars, certainly not if you don't have a leg to stand on. Star, keep on rocking.

  66.168.247.159, you should really read your comment. It is not helping anything and could aggravate the situation. Also, Star, who someone is is not important. ~~Ebe123~~ → report 23:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 22:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. Thank you. ^_^ Swifty*^talk 23:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC) Strike two

LOL @ sockpuppetry. Good luck with that. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

It does look like you edited while logged out on a page you had edited while logged in, which is problematic. That might just be a single slip up, but I would feel better if you dropped by the SPI page and commented there. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

It wasn't him. 207.157.121.92 (talk) 15:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Some thoughts

Hi Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. I've been looking into the conduct of the editors involved in this recent We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together stuff. I know the content dispute is now at DRN, I've summarised my view of what that content dispute actually is there. However, there's a few things I thought I should talk to you about.

• Whilst our bold, revert, discuss cycle does suggest that reverting controversial changes is a step towards discussion it specifically suggests that you don't use "no consensus" as a reason for the revert. In fact, we have another essay on the matter - Don't revert due solely to "no consensus". It's very good advice, as it reduces the amount of edit wars out there.
• Edit warring. I do notice between 18:00 on 27 August 2012 and 14:40 on 28 August 2012 you've made 5 reverts. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) That's clearly over the 3RR limit and could well deserve a block. Consider this a warning - stop edit warring. I hope you will be taking it to the talk page for future discussions.
• Civility, calling editors "fanboys" is derogatory at best and a personal attack at worst. Try to comment on the content, not the contributors.

Otherwise, I'm glad to see you've apologised to Toa, who did nothing wrong. I'm hoping the content can be sorted at DRN and if there's anything else I can do to sort things out, let me know. Worm^TT(talk) 12:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the rationale explanation and advice. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Category:Youth Olympics logos

Hello Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:Youth Olympics logos, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Category is not empty. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Easy4Me

I understand you disagree with his edits but why not just add the citation yourself? That would solve all issues and you wouldn't have to remove accurate information. Toa Nidhiki05 17:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

It's inaccurate. It is only available in some kind of "pre-chart", so it's not even official until the chart is published on Thursday. If it was just one article he did this to, I might go ahead and change it, but he continues to do this despite previous warnings and not just from me. It's like a race for this guy to be the one to update it first, which he practically admits he does here. He needs to learn that this is an unacceptable practice and in complete violation of WP:V. Why should I correct the work of an editor who doesn't understand core policies? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Billboard charts (with the exception of the mixed data charts such as the Billboard 200, which track airplay from Wednesday to Tuseday) such as the ones listed on Chart Highlights track from Monday to Sunday. All charts are fully released on Thursday. Regardless, the numbers are official, so you could simply add the citation or, alternatively, ask him to to it instead of removing the information entirely. Toa Nidhiki05 18:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I have asked him to do so on multiple occassions and did so again this time. I don't go searching Billboard for sources that someone else added. The problem with those "chart highlights" links is that they usually go dead in a week, and it doesn't provide full chart information, so you can end up with conflicting information. But it is up to the editor who changes sourced information to provide a reliable source. If he can't do that, he should not be making such changes in the first place. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Correct, but there are ways to archive links or articles. The links really aren't needed anyway after the charts are updated on Thursday. Toa Nidhiki05 18:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

But that would mean updating the source twice every week, if you're going to use both the "chart highlights" on Monday or Tuesday and the actual published chart info on Thursday. You cannot change the chart position on one day and say "the source will update in a couple of days so it's ok." --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Now That's What I Call Music! 81 (UK_series)

Can you please add this to your watch page. Someone has twice now removed artist links and incorrectly changed the grammar and/or wording of the track listing. I trust your editing of these, since we've had prior discussions on these albums/cds pages previously. If anything is incorrect, can you let me know? To my knowledge, all the links the IP Address user keeps removing do actually link to their proper pages, so I'm not clear as to why this person is removing them. Thebog1984 (talk) 00:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Czarkoff's talk page.
Message added 12:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Beat Goes On (Cash Cash album)

I wanted to notify you that I have renominated The Beat Goes On (Cash Cash album), an article you nominated for deletion nearly two months ago. You are welcome to voice your concerns and comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beat Goes On (Cash Cash album) (2nd nomination). Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 23:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Templates for you

If you want to erase some empty links so bad, erase these. Because I am tired of users like you, coming around and erasing/undoing edits on pages that growing. Erase these or leave the Toshinobu Kubota pages alone. Because unless they are erased, I will not allow you to keep disturbing the template.

• 1st set of Templates

1. America's Best Dance Crew
2. Bobby Brown
3. D'Angelo
4. Destiny's Child
5. Fantasia Barrino
6. Janelle Monáe
7. LeToya Luckett
8. Mario Winans
9. Michelle Williams (singer)
10. Missy Elliott singles
11. Nashville Star
12. Raphael Saadiq
13. Rihanna
14. Roc Nation
15. Sean Combs
16. Tearria Mari
17. Usher (entertainter)

And there are many more. I will keep posting for you. If you would like to reply back, visit my page. Sysmithfan (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

• 2nd set of Templates

1. Bilal (American singer)
2. Common (entertainer)
3. Diana Ross
4. G-Unit Records
5. Gym Class Heroes
6. Mary J. Blige
7. Natasha Bedingfield
8. The Rolling Stones singles
9. The Supremes singles
10. The Temptations

This is second set of templates. Enjoy! Sysmithfan (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I do not need to read your history of edits, nor do I care. You should erase the non-existing articles in those templates or do not erase at all. Sysmithfan (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

About your Third Opinion request: Your request has been removed because the Third Opinion project, like all forms of content dispute resolution at Wikipedia, requires substantial discussion of the issue at a talk page before requesting dispute resolution. If discussion comes to a deadlock, you may then request dispute resolution. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

More work for you

Since chart runs go against WP:CHARTTRAJ, please remove all chart runs from every Misia album page. Mother Father Brother Sister, Love Is the Message, Marvelous, etc. Enjoy! Sysmithfan (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

• WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:NORUSH. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

TFD notice of a template you have been an editor of Nomination for deletion of Template:Pat Walshe

Template:Pat Walshe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Indie pop categories

Consistency I don't have a vested interest in whether or not indie pop is actually a genre of pop music, but if you're going to remove some categorization schemes for their albums, please remove them all. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:05, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I was just doing the ones I was passing by. WP:NODEADLINE. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:56, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Granted There is no deadline, but there are so few subcategories that it can all be done in one fell swoop. Either way, the main category and article are still categorized that way--if anything, you should start there. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

The Uprising

Hi, just wondering why you marked The Uprising article as a stub. If you can tell me what it's missing then I'll adjust accordingly. -DJUnBalanced (talk) 20:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Mannheim Steamroller Christmas albums

Category:Mannheim Steamroller Christmas albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:27, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Daya-Nand Verma

I have declined your A3 speedy on this, because the history shows an earlier version which did have content, before the unexplained removal of everything but the links. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Afd for Farrah Franklin

Do you think we can delete this page considering that there are no reliable sources linked to it? This page is going absolutely nowhere and there is nothing significant about it. I am asking you since you know a lot about deleting articles. And by the way, I am 100% serious about this. This does not involve our past bias. Can we delete this page or merge it? Sysmithfan (talk) 22:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

It appears to be a good candidate for merging into Destiny's Child, but with little reliable info within the article and so little time with the group, I could see this getting deleted in an AfD. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Can you nominate this for complete deletion? I would do it myself, but I am not good at that type of thing. Sysmithfan (talk) 00:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Also, can we delete this page to? Sysmithfan (talk) 04:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Beatles album track listings

Hi! The reason why I think these should be retained is that, if you're reading through track articles one by one for an album, it's quicker to pop up the track listing (and would be even quicker if they were permanently visible) than to navigate to the album page. Beeflin (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I see what you mean, but personally I find the vertical listing a better one, and its position too. I'll go to the page you recommend and see if I can contribute there too. Beeflin (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Luxembourgish

Hi! According to the conventions of the Luxembourg WikiProject, Luxembourgish, rather than Luxembourgian, is the proper form and there is an effort to change all Wikipedia articles and projects accordingly. Would you mind undoing the changes you made? Thanks! Seven Letters 20:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

error in histmerge request

• At 20:06, 5 November 2012‎ you asked for Now That's What I Call Music 83 to be history-merged into Now That's What I Call Music! 83 (UK series). But page Now That's What I Call Music 83 does not exist and has mever existed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Headlines and Deadlines – The Hits of A-ha

Hello, I removed your prod from the above article as the album charted in several countries. Thank you. Rotten regard Softnow 00:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

record label templates

per this TfD, you may want to consider: Template:Warp Records, Template:Smallman Records, Template:Driven Music Group, Template:Bieler Bros. Records, Template:Carved Records, Template:Indianola Records. Frietjes (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Ivy Queen

Hello, I'm Diva Knockouts. I would just like to take the time and thank you for your helpful edits to the categories on various Ivy Queen's albums and singles' articles. Thanks!

User_talk:Jax_0677

Wanna keep an eye on him? He's in serious need of a clue. He's created other navboxen that fail WP:NENAN and tried to filbuster that they do meet it. Every other navbox he's ever made has been totally half-assed like the George Jones one. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Discussion of interest

I have started a thread at Wikipedia talk:Navigation templates#Fourth point under "Navigation templates provide navigation between existing articles" and invite you to the discussion, which you'll likely be interested in. — ξ^xplicit 02:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

• Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Notifying for an editor who failed to. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:26, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Viva la Diva (Darcey Bussell and Katherine Jenkins)

Hello, just letting you know I removed the prod from the above article as it appears to be notable. Thank you. Rotten regard Softnow 00:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thanks for your work in Category:Anjan Dutt albums. Tito Dutta (talk) 05:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Ania albums

Category:Ania albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 18:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Explorers Club albums

Category:Explorers Club albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Miss me?

Message 1: You never sent me messages lately, but I had to edit Kidz Bop, Kidz Bop 22 and Kidz Bop 23 because of somebody edit on Kidz Bop for this this had put Kidz Bop 24 to Kidz Bop 27. These were never released yet, but Kidz Bop 23 I left alone because it is right now being preordered. Kidz Bop 22 I edited because a person changed the track list from {{info}} to {{info. 𝕁𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕟 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕟 𝕂𝕪𝕤𝕖𝕣 22:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Message 2: This same person just put it back but of Kidz Bop 24 thru 27, he/she put Kidz Bop 28. This person is messing with Kidz Bop article. 𝕁𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕟 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕟 𝕂𝕪𝕤𝕖𝕣 22:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Message 3: Somebody took off the infobox for the Kidz Bop albums. Please fix this!!!!! 𝕁𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕟 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕟 𝕂𝕪𝕤𝕖𝕣 21:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanKyser22 (talk • contribs)

YU 100: Najbolji albumi jugoslovenske rok i pop muzike

You marked the list from the article YU 100: najbolji albumi jugoslovenske rok i pop muzike as a potential copyright issue. I know that it would be a violation of copyright if it was created in creative manner, but it was compiled according to the poll, so I am not really sure why it is different than Le Monde's 100 Books of the Century or The 100 Best Books of All Time. Ostalocutanje (talk) 21:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

First thing is that maybe they are copyright violations as well, but here's why I think they aren't. Le Monde's 100 Books of the Century appears to be a poll taken among the general public, any one who knew about it could probably participate. The 100 Best Books of All Time does not rank the books in any way thus there is no creative methodology to determine any rankings. YU 100 is published work ranking the top albums, and those polled were knowledgeable experts in their field. Note that this issue has come up many times and, as you can see, no such ranked lists exist at Time's List of the 100 Best Novels and Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:32, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, i noticed that you wrote that they are experts in their fields, but that's the thing - not all of them are. As you noticed, most of them are not music critics, so I think it could bee seen, in a way, as a poll among public. Anyway, I think I'll give up on this article, as providing the license would probably mean contacting both of the book authors. Ostalocutanje (talk) 21:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

You've made improvements to the article as it is, even without the full list, so I hope you don't give up on it entirely. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Friendly reminder

Redirects Please don't empty redirects of their categories. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Please provide sources that the album Baby Rock is "alternative rock", "synthpop", "rap rock", "hip hop", "pop", and "electronic", or remove such categories from Category:Back-On albums. Just because the artist is described as playing this type of music does not mean by default that this particular album is. Maybe it is, I don't know, it is not sourced. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

There is also no source that the album was released in 2005. Just because it says so on Wikipedia doesn't make it true. Categorized redirects require verification. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 

RFC about iTunes as a source for release histories

Hi, I would appreciate it if you could please take some time to comment at Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song)#How_is_iTunes_messed_up. p.s. this is related to a previous discussion at Talk:Two Eleven. Thanks — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Jax 0677

Any chance I can get you to explain to him more eloquently why it's okay to redirect a non-notable album to an artist without retaining the tracklist on the target page? Discussion here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:24, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Talk:E5 (EP).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. You have new messages at Talk:E5 (EP).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Merry Christmas! 𝕁𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕟 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕟 𝕂𝕪𝕤𝕖𝕣 01:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree to you

That a review of the category substructures within Category:Athletics (sport) and Category:Track and field may need to be reviewed. But I wonder if you can make a judgment on the question I posed here. In particular the fact that: Track and field (that not included road and cross-country events), are 21 events of the 25 of the athletics (sport). Ok an athlete (also in Italy) is a sportperson, but in en.wikipedia the covention says that is only "track and field athlete" (see Category:Olympic athletes (track and field) by country), included Category:Racewalkers, Category:Marathon runners and Category:Middle distance runners and Category:Long-distance runners that practice cross-country running. I did not establish this convention. Look at this Category:Athletes by nationality («This category is for competitors within the sport of athletics, comprising track and field, road running, cross country running and racewalking.»). Tnx. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)