User talk:Spleodrach/Archive/Archive 009

Cumann na Poblachta

A chara, An cainteoir dúchasach thú? Cheartaigh tú 'cumann' ó "organisation" go "society" nuair a bhíonn an dá aistriúchán sásta. De ŕéir teanglan.ie, chím 'political organisation' le 'cumann'. Ós rud é gur duine gnìomhach agus fear faire thú, ba leisce liom do chuid saothair a cheartú gan phlé - ach níl 'society' níos achomaire ná 'organisation' ins an chás seo. Grma Billsmith60 (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

A chara, 'association' a bhí mé a mhaíomh: níl a fhios agam caidé mar a tháinig 'organisation' chugam ina ionad aréir - rud a scríobh mé! Grma arís eile Billsmith60 (talk) 11:50, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

A chara, @Billsmith60:

• Cumann na nGaedheal - "Society of the Gaels"
• Cumann Poblachta na hÉireann - "Republican Society of Ireland"
• Cumann na mBan - "The Women's Council"
• Cumann na Saoirse - "The League for Freedom"
• Cumann Gaelach - "Irish Language Society"
• Cumann Lúthchleas Gael - "Gaelic Athletic Association"
• Cumann - "Association" - Also used by some political parties to refer to their local branches.

As you can see, Cummann is variously translated as Society/Association/Council/League. There is no standard but Society is the most common. Mise le meas, Spleodrach (talk) 12:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election

On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at the 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election, voters were asked to bring their own pen or pencil? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Dublin Bay South by-election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 Dublin Bay South by-election), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Standard address?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't standard address apply only to current sovereign states? Many Irish cricketers were born in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (which I shorten to 'Ireland' as it looks ugly in an infobox), a historic state. So that is normally linked, as is commonplace in say military history articles where we link historic states but don't link to current states. StickyWicket (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

@AssociateAffiliate: Please MOS:IMOS BIOPLACE - "For people anywhere else in Ireland at any time, "Ireland" should be used". Spleodrach (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Ernie O'Malley

Hello. I noticed that most refs are not in the 'cite web' format, so I made them all consistent. I haven't the time to use the very cumbersome 'cite web' format, unless you can point me to a quick way to do so? Thanks, Billsmith60 (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

@Billsmith60: Use cite templates is the correct way for formatting refs with web links. There are no short cuts, it takes time. Wikipedia has no dedlines! Spleodrach (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Dublin University

Good work updating the University of Dublin links. It’s something I was intending to do either today or tomorrow, but deliberately waited a few days to make sure the page move to the primary page stuck. For that reason, I had updated only the piped links to check for double redirects at the time I was moving the page. –Iveagh Gardens (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Iveagh Gardens (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Seán Barrett (politician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Furthermore, I noticed that your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hi Spleodrach! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Workers' Party of Ireland several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Workers' Party of Ireland, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Michael O'Kennedy. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 01:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

You still didn't add more citations, just tag and go. Lazy, expecting other to work for you. Yet you still had time to re-add the tag, and leave a message here, numpty! Spleodrach (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Liam Mellows

Perhaps you didn't notice the *six edits I did to the above article very recently? So far from 'drive-by' tagging, I've been busy with that article. Have a nice day Billsmith60 (talk) 10:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Erin McGreehan edit.

I didn't appreciate your extremely rude comment about my recent edit to the Wikipedia article about Senator Erin McGreehan. I thought we are meant to have some decorum as Wikipedia editors. You obviously have absolutely no decorum, using language like that. Laggan Boy (talk) 11:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

oh, you poor snowflake. Spleodrach (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Just wondering why you reverted my edit of Local government in the Republic of Ireland? The edit was in accordance with WP:IMOS and MS:FIRST only says it should be the page title, not must, and may appear in a slightly different form. Cashew.wheel (talk) 07:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC):

It's better that the intro matches the article title. If you feel that strongly, then please start a discussion on the article's talk page. Spleodrach (talk) 21:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

European Parliaments pre-Brexit and Irish republican legitimist Dáils

The first Dáil's membership was drawn from the UK Parliament elected in 1918, which had constituencies representing the entire Island of Ireland and places outside it (in this case, Great Britain). The European Parliament pre-Brexit also had constituencies representing the entire Island of Ireland and places outside it (in this case, Great Britain + other EU member states at the time). So if a pre-Irish Independence UK Parliament was "good enough for a Dáil", then the European Parliament pre-Brexit would theoretically be "good enough for a Dáil" from a legitimist POV as well. Glide08 (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

This is completely original research by you, totally unbacked by any reliable references. Stop adding it to wikipedia, Spleodrach (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Revert: Fine Gael

Hi, I see you've reverted my edit to the Fine Gael infobox twice based on "FG is not organised in NI only ROI". That is correct, Fine Gael are not active in Northern Ireland.

However the article doesn't mention Northern Ireland nor the island of Ireland in the same context (of the opening paragraph or infobox), therefore the MOS from WP:IRE-IRL applies here.

• "Use 'Ireland' for the state except where the island of Ireland or Northern Ireland is being discussed in the same context." Cashew.wheel (talk) 08:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

@Cashew.wheel: WP:IRE-IRL does not apply here. By using Ireland in the infobox, you are causing it to point to the incorrect articles, i.e. Politics of Ireland, rather than Politics of the Republic of Ireland. WP:IRE-IRL is for text in the main article not in infoboxes, where different articles are pointed to depending on the input of the field. Spleodrach (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

{{Infobox political party}} includes the "country_dab1" property for that specific purpose. Cashew.wheel (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@Cashew.wheel: I have updated the article with dabs. Spleodrach (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Broderick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Brodrick.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm Neveselbert. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Vera Cosgrave that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I was not being overzealous; for you to use that term in your summary was uncalled for. User:Ohconfucius/script/Common Terms delinks county names that follow a linked city/town as it is not considered helpful to link both per MOS:OVERLINK. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 01:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Donnellan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Donnellan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Kevin Barry

Just wanted to clarify, I was planning on removing the infobox myself, but was waiting to see if there was an "official" conclusion of the conversation. (Still new here, not 100% sure of the process) Cashew.wheel (talk) 03:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

@Cashew.wheel: As user:BrownHairedGirl said in the discussion. There would have to be a RFC discussion, and if that RFC agreed, then the infobox criminal could be added to Irish Revolutionaries. Unless that happens, the module can be removed, as there is no consensus for adding it. Spleodrach (talk) 09:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Regarding the use of images on Wikipedia

Hi Spleodrach, If It's alright, I'll like to address an issue we've gone back and forth on now several times, the topic of images in articles:

I understand that Wikipedia is not supposed to be a gallery, but by the same token, it's not supposed to be a bare-bones, text-only website either. For me personally, Images are very important because I'm (partially) a visual learner. Images help cement new information into my mind, which is important, because I actually suffer from a condition called Dyspraxia, which amongst other issues, can make it difficult for me to concentrate on a particular item. Images in articles quite genuinely make it easier for me to remember/learn the information contained in them.

But even if it wasn't the case that I had dyspraxia, I believe the way I add images to be in-line with how Wikipedia is supposed to be. Let's examine a high profile, heavily edited article such as Karl Marx for example; Going through the many images contained inside it, we can see that besides images directly of Marx himself there are images of Engels, his family, images of G.W.F. Hegel and Ludwig Feuerbach who influenced his thinking and an image of the working class used to illustrate Marx's views about the working class. If we look at the high-profile article Martin Luther King Jr., we can find a stand alone image of frequent collaborator Bayard Rustin. Featured article Lady Gaga has two stand-alone images of Madonna and David Bowie because they were strong influences on her. Similarly, Good article Miley Cyrus displays standalone images of Elvis Presley and Britney Spears in the influences section as well as an image of Madonna elsewhere in the article.

Can we come to understanding where you're not as strict on images as you currently are? CeltBrowne (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, @CeltBrowne:, thank you for sharing your personal info, and for making a good point about images in general. I see your point about articles not being text only. I won't revert your image edits in future, assuming you don't add a gallery of them. Spleodrach (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Cheers! CeltBrowne (talk) 19:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Liam twomey

Hi, is it possible to reverse your edits you made to martial status on this page? Liam is no longer married. Thank you in advance. Anonedit1961 (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable reference for that? Is you are a relation/friend/work colleague of "Liam", then its a Conflict of Interest to edit his page? Spleodrach (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Spleodrach!

Happy New Year!

Spleodrach,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Eileen Desmond

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.dib.ie/biography/desmond-eileen-nee-harrington-a9386, which is not released under a compatible license. Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Diannaa:, I thought that the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International mentioned on the dib page was Wikipedia compatible. I wouldn't have copied the text otherwise. Thanks for letting me know. Can you tell me what CC licenses are compatible with Wikipedia? Spleodrach (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

A "Non Commercial" license does not allow commercial use, and our license does. So that's not a compatible license. Sorry, — Diannaa (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Richard Burke (Irish politician). Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Show some respect! Spleodrach (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Harp or not? Make up your mind!

On the talk page for the Taioseach page, I thought it was agreed that a harp logo to represent the Irish government would be used. I create one, and it gets removed? I can't seem to win, are we to use a harp logo or not?

Link BlockBuster2K43 (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

No, its just more clutter. Please read MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Specifically, "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." Spleodrach (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Robert J. McCann deletion

Could you please reverse your call to delete the Robert J. McCann article? The man was the president of UBS Americas, a contributor to numerous charities, and has a relationship with presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. It is in the public interest for facts about this man to be known. Tarcanes (talk) 18:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

ANI discussion involving you

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruption by Laurel Lodged. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:13, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:By-elections to the 4th Dáil

Template:By-elections to the 4th Dáil has been nominated for merging with Template:Dáil by-elections. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Please note that this proposal also includes merging 23 other similar templates to the same target page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Labour Panel senators etc

Hi Spleodrach

I see that you have been populating Category:Labour Panel senators and the other categories for senators elected by the 5 Panels.

I just thought i should tell you that since I created those categories yesterday, I have been been working my way through the Seanad members navboxes, building offline a set of lists of members of the Seanad by panel. When those lists are complete, I will use them as the the basis of AWB runs to populate the categories.

Those AWB runs will not add a duplicate category, so no harm will be done by having us both on the case. But an AWB run is much less work, so I just wanted to let you that for these 5 categories, your manual hard work may not be needed. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: Ok, you can do your AWB thing then. Spleodrach (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Workers' Barnstar
		For your efforts improving articles related to Socialism and tagging articles relevant to WikiProject Socialism.
		this WikiAward was given to Spleodrach by Cdjp1 (talk) on 17:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dáil constituency (UK)

Template:Dáil constituency (UK) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Anna Mary Henrietta Henrietta Childers

In a spirit of genuine enquiry, why are the parents of biography subjects included in the infobox for office-holders only if they have their own article? Your editsummary here. I looked at Template:Infobox officeholder, which offers only: "mother may be used (optionally with father parameter) in place of parents parameter (displays "Parent(s)" as label).". Thanks.--AntientNestor (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @AntientNestor: The documentation on Template:Infobox officeholder does not say anything about wikilinking or not for parents. Looking at some UK PMs: Tony Blair; his father Leo Blair has an article and is mentioned in the infobox, while his mother Hazel Blair does not have an article, and is only mentioned in text. Same goes for Margaret Thatcher, John Major, and Liz Truss. Winston Churchill and Boris Johnson have both parents in the infobox, as both parents have articles. Rishi Sunak has both parents-in-law mentioned in the infobox as they both have articles, but his parents are only mentioned in the article text. This would indicate that it is standard practice (at least for UK PMs) to include a parent in the infobox only if they have an article. Spleodrach (talk) 10:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt reply. --AntientNestor (talk) 10:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Eileen Flynn

Just FYI, I think the comment was in response to the The Irish Sun, not on Twitter. Regardless, I don't feel a particular need to add it back. David Malone (talk)

Well, where ever it came from, Wikipedia doesn't do that kind of thing! Also, the Sun is not a reliable source. Spleodrach (talk) 09:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Fair. David Malone (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Copyright problem on William John Johnston

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.dib.ie/biography/johnston-william-john-a9811, which is not released under a compatible license. Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, most of the content had to be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Colm Ó Snodaigh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colm Ó Snodaigh, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colm Ó Snodaigh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Rollback

I find it necessary to express a bit of concern about this use of rollback. The edit being reverted appears to be made in good faith, not obvious vandalism and other edits where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear, which is the standard for default rollback use. The reversion of this edit seems to have been more of a candidate for the undo tool than rollback. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 05:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

@EggRoll97: Ok, I see your point. Spleodrach (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

"Rainbow Coalition (Ireland 1992)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rainbow Coalition (Ireland 1992) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18 § Rainbow Coalition (Ireland 1992) until a consensus is reached. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 15:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)