talk to me.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, RouLong. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 15:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback

edit

Your question at the Teahouse has been answered.--Mark 18:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aam Aadmi Party

edit

Your repeated reverts of sourced published albeit "controversial" material is what is called as "edit warring".

  1. NitiCentral is not a "blog" of Kanchan Gupta, it is a digital online news media. [http://nitidigital.com/aboutus.php. Kanchan Gupta is a well known journalist and as per NitiDigital "Kanchan Gupta is Editorial Director of NiTi Digital. He has worked at several newspapers, including The Telegraph, The Statesman and The Pioneer. During a break from journalism he served in the PMO as an aide to Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee". NitiDigital's political "POV" is openly declared "Centre-Right", NitiCentral has other Pioneer columnists like Sandhya Jain etc. As you may know Sandhya Jain's father Girilal Jain was Congress person for much of his life. Also, the report on AAP sucking up to jihadis was not written by Gupta but by some Mohanty.
  2. Please justify what is "my" apconews ? Indianewsco is an expensive news feed which only TV broadcasters use to chase breaking news stories from one news channel to another can afford. Their website is almost nothing of their feeds and only carries few Slug (publishing)s. See this [1], is it biased against AAP ? Then see this ghit [2] only Indianewsco and HT have this story, and only Indianewsco has the AAP worker's quote taken from a local TV soundbite.
  3. Are you saying that there was no online controversy at all involving Kumar Viswas's silence on his own stand 4 years ago about Mohan Chand Sharma and what Arvind Kejriwal write about "fake" Batla House enounter. ? Did he not defend himself on Facebook in 25 July 2013 [3] ? Then what happened on 28 July 2013 that 2 independent news agencies publish the same FACT about Kumar Vishwaas using abusive language to questioner's on Twitter within few minutes of each other, Indianewsco first followed by Niti Central 53 minutes later. Can you explain it ? The language of the 2 agencies is also very different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWikiIndian (talkcontribs) 23:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Discuss at Talk:Aam_Aadmi_Party. RouLong (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sarbajit Roy

edit

Please see this diff [4] and your edit comment " Is this your reliable source : Discussion forums/Facebook chat do not count as reliable source. Removed". Who have you addressed this to, and are you saying I added the deleted reference ? If not please mind your language and tone while addressing other editors. TheWikiIndian (talk) 23:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Discuss at Talk:Sarbajit Roy. RouLong (talk) 05:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Shahid Kapoor. Thank you. Do not change the birth name without proper sourcing. NeilN talk to me 19:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please read the talk page. --NeilN talk to me 19:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kirti Chakra may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | IC-47050 || [COL || GURBIR SINGH SARNA || GDRS, 29 RR (Indian Army) ||2007 || ||POSTHUMOUS) <ref name="Army2007"> Army 2007 Kirti Chakra Awardee http://indianarmy.nic.in/Site/FormTemplete/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Manish Sisodia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[https://twitter.com/msisodia Official Twitter]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Page move

edit

You copied the text of Vinod Chaubey to Vinod Kumar Choubey, presumably because you prefer this alternate spelling, and then redirected this article to the new one. This is an improper way to move a page. There is a page move process that preserves the entire page history, which is important because the page history provides attribution, so we know who created and contributed to the article. I have undone your edits in these pages. If you would like to update the existing Vinod Chaubey page, please do so. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirti Chakra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aam Aadmi Party debate

edit

Can you please go through the talk page of this article & comment your opinion on 'battery operated rickshaw driver's protest'

Summary of it is as below.

Topic- Which of the two versions be preferred to go into the protest section of 'Article'

Option A -

ADD - The AAP has supported various regulatory complaints raised by rickshaw operators in Delhi.

KEEP - the rest of the 'protest' section as it is.

Option B -

ADD - On 16 September 2013, Aam Aadmi Party supported e-rickshaw driver's demand in Delhi that there should be a policy on battery operated rickshaws in the capital city to stop their exploitation by Delhi Transport Department. Party also said that a subsidy should be given to manual rickshaw drivers who want to purchase e-rickshaws. Earlier in June 2013, the party had supported agitations of rickshaw drivers against ban on advertisements on auto rickshaws alleging that the ban is imposed because most rickshaw drivers supported Aam Aadmi party & carried their banners.

remove - On 10 June 2013, Kejriwal supported the agitation of Delhi auto rickshaw drivers, who were protesting the Delhi government's ban on advertisements on auto rickshaws. Kejriwal claimed that, auto rickshaw drivers supported his party and they carried AAP's advertisements on their auto rickshaws and this is the reason for Delhi Government's ban and he challenged that volunteers of AAP will put 10,000 advertisements on auto rickshaws as a protest.

There is no conflict over the validity of citations.--ratastro (talk) 05:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

edit
 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Aam Aadmi_Party". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 07:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit

  Your addition to Aam Aadmi Party has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aam Aadmi Party may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 19 July 2013}}</ref> By 5th of October 2013, the party has announced 57 candidates. <ref> {{cite news |title=Will adopt Jan Lokpal Bill on December 29 if AAP wins: Arvind Kejriwal |url=http:/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Opting in to VisualEditor

edit

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RouLong. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Bharatiya Janata Party: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. I've now notified the editor in connection with the following revert. [5] -- Trevj (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply