User talk:Pegship/Mar2012-Sep2016

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Pegship. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 13:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Good work!

I can see that you are doing good work. I have provided a belated welcome page, but I see you are doing very well already. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

E-mail. Please reply.

Hello, Pegship. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nomination of Crayola Kids Adventures: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crayola Kids Adventures: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crayola Kids Adventures: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:VinnieTakesABow.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:VinnieTakesABow.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

List of top-grossing movies in the Philippines listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of top-grossing movies in the Philippines. Since you had some involvement with the List of top-grossing movies in the Philippines redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LukeSurl ^{t c} 23:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zia1stedition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zia1stedition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

*waves back!*

Glad to know some of the "oldtimers" are still around - and I too have fond memories of you :) Things aren't too bad here... and I'm still keeping my hand in with a few edits here on Wikipedia. Hope things are well with you Grutness...wha? 00:38, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Who Murdered Chaucer?

The article Who Murdered Chaucer? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After nine years, this subject offers no credential of notability. The author is not a reputable Chaucerian analyst. The article remains as little more than an advertisement for the book, while providing no encyclopedic information about it. Since the title is listed in an article on the author, there seems little point in keeping the present article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bjenks (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

• Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
• Get involved in some of our special projects:
  • Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
  • Help develop a template for citing archival collections
  • Write guides to accessing and using library resources

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

How are things?

Hello, and I know it has been quite a while. How you are doing and the the Films based on X project is going, if at all. LA If you reply here, please {{Ping}} me. @ 06:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central Brooklyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prospect Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Stubs

Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 15:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Help me with logo

Hello! Pegship. Can you please be so kind to help me due to create a logo of "S.A.Students Organization for us. Please! Thanks.

Ras Benjih (talk) 14:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brahmakayastha Rajanayas

added a link pointing to Upper Caste

Murabit al-Hajj

added a link pointing to Mauritanian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UFO Crash at Roswell

The article UFO Crash at Roswell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

stub sort

I somehow found a better sort at my sandbox —Preceding undated comment added 23:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jai Dev Anand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhadravati. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sungwal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lodi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Input welcome on Stub category CfD

Hi Peg - any chance on some stub sorters (such as yourself) commenting on this discussion? Grutness...wha? 15:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Posting above the notice

What if they use the "New section" tab? That's what the last two did. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Oh, snap. Well, it was a thought. Maybe they'll see it when they save?? Her Pegship (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CommissarDVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CommissarDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:xbox stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:xbox stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hey Girlfriend! Need hand on an LCCN

Hey Peg! Glad to see you're still around. Having trouble locating the correct LCCN ID number in a book I plan on citing on numerous topic pages with overlapping history: The work is 1989 ISBN 0-930973-09-7

Hmmmm

From my offline prep of {{cite book}}... using '| lccn= 89-25150' things would seem to work okay and my guess be correct:

Bartholomew, Ann M.; Metz, Lance E.; Kneis, Michael (1989). DELAWARE and LEHIGH CANALS, 158 pages (First ed.). Oak Printing Company, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Center for Canal History and Technology, Hugh Moore Historical Park and Museum, Inc., Easton, Pennsylvania. p. 25-28. ISBN 0930973097. LCCN 89-25150. Hello again Peg! I need to say hi!

The issue is a bit academic, inasmuch as the Format section of Library of Congress Control Number claims six digits with leading zeros are the current format. The picyune question which gives me an excuse to renew acquaintance is whether that paragraph should perhaps mention that older LCCN's may not have such leading zeros (assuming I've reasoned this all out correctly!) since no other coded sequence on that line resembles said format in the least. So Hi! Miss You! and have I got this right? How's the Family? IIRC, you're putting up with teens nowadays! Ouchy! Warm regards, FrankB 15:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

What, no hello! Don't you love me any more? Happy Olympics Sunday! LOL FrankB 17:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

I plead the aforementioned teens (and participation in local theatre) for the delay. XD Glad to hear you're still poking around! It sounds like you've figured out the LCCN issue; if you want to add that the leading zeros are a more recent addition to the format, that might forestall any questions you might field. Nap time now...! Cheers, Her Pegship (talk) 21:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Alas, I fear we are both getting into years where those nap-naps are no longer for the kids! Nor staying the years... when they are unattractive and seem like a waste of resources! But now Teens! Oh my! Are you playing Chauffeur and sports-mom too? I spent man months between soccer, baseball and cub & boy scouts. At least in the latter I occasionally got some exercise! I remember those years, good luck with that! LOL Be well! // FrankB 03:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Invite to join Stub Improvement WikiProject

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Stub improvement. We work on improving stub articles on Wikipedia to above stub status quality. If you are interested in joining, please feel free to visit the Project Page!. Thank You. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 18:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Blake Fitzpatrick

Hi! I thought you would like to know that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_Fitzpatrick was deleted and is currently under deletion review after an arguably unreliable second Afd. Filmfan655321 (talk) 12:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Pegship. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)