Emblem-relax.svg Please assume good faith. Nuvola apps kdict.svg

Category:United States internet company stubs has been nominated for discussionEdit

 

Category:United States internet company stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

User talk archivalEdit

Hey and long time no see! I just happened to notice that in your most recent user talk archival, you moved the page to User talk:ArchiveSept2019, aka the talkpage of the fictional user ArchiveSept2019. I'm going to guess you intended to move it to User talk:Pegship/ArchiveSept2019 as with your other archives?   AddWittyNameHere 01:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

  indeed! Error corrected. (I hope.)
Seems fixed now, yes. Other than the lack of signature on the above comment, anyway.   AddWittyNameHere 22:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-blue-plastic.pngEdit

 

The file File:Library-logo-blue-plastic.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-shadow.pngEdit

 

The file File:Library-logo-shadow.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-white.pngEdit

 

The file File:Library-logo-white.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-white-reverse.pngEdit

 

The file File:Library-logo-white-reverse.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy HolidaysEdit

  Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 03:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

The Category BarnstarEdit

I've remastered your 2007 barnstar and added it to Template:The Category Barnstar. I know there was a Categorization Barnstar, but I thought your design was way better. I've added both templates @Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories. Jerm (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Stub categoriesEdit

Hello, I have not worked much in the stub category creation and related work so far. However, I miss some stub categories every now and then when I work on stub-sorting. These are mostly non-controversial, and mostly related to India. For example, there are 30+ states in India, however a few states are missing here: Category:India stubs by state or union territory (and hence subcategories as well). Should I propose stub categories/templates Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals as Speedy/General after doing precheck.
Could I guide me a little while I try to explore this area? Regards, --Titodutta (talk) 23:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Titodutta (talk · contribs) - Hello, and thanks for asking. Firstly, if you decide a stub type is needed, by all means propose it at the project page. Secondly, I'm not sure why some states are missing from Category:India stubs by state or union territory, unless perhaps there are not enough articles to create a sub-category for a particular state/territory. In that case, an upmerged template for a state could be created, but project guidelines are not to create a stub category for a template until the template is used on more than 60 articles. Does this information help at all? Her Pegship (I'm listening) 23:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AdrianMessengerVHS.pngEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:AdrianMessengerVHS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:COVID-19 stubs has been nominated for discussionEdit

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_17#Category:COVID-19_stubs. – Fayenatic London 08:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

TalkEdit

Do you belongs to bamanhat Arghadwip sarkar (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

"O (star trek)" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O (star trek). Since you had some involvement with the O (star trek) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Nepal-geo-stubEdit

Your Pegship, {{Mechi-geo-stub}} is now orphaned. And {{Terhathum-geo-stub}} needs to be moved to {{Tehrathum-geo-stub}}. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

I also wanted to ask you if there is a way to check if there are red geo-stub templates in mainspace. I have started using AWB, and I am worried I might miss a typo and accidentally put an article into a non-existing geo-stub. Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Also orphaned {{Dhawalagiri-geo-stub}}, {{Seti-geo-stub}} and {{Mahakali-geo-stub}}. Last of the bunch, I think. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Nepal Barnstar of National Merit
Thank you for your diligent work organising thousands of stubs on Nepal's geography—for hours of research and homework it must have needed, dozens of new templates and categories that needed creating, and thousands of edits adding them to the articles. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Special:Diff/966215763/nextEdit

Is the nominator supposed to create the category? If yes, how is he even meant to notice his discussion was closed? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, @1234qwer1234qwer4:! If the nom prefers that someone else create the category, they may just say so as part of the proposal, or contact someone who seems to be active in that area. Also, using the "watch this page" function when making a proposal will normally give someone a heads-up when the discussion is closed. Her Pegship (I'm listening) 22:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)