drive

The world was created for all.

No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!

— SafariScribe

Question from Badfighter-29 (13:43, 26 April 2024) edit

Hello! I hope you're well.

I'm not sure how this works, please confirm: are you a real person or a chatbot? I have a question: how do I add notes to a Wikipedia article? There are a few articles I want to add the note of 'the neutrality of this article is disputed.' What is the procedure for that?

Thank you and best wishes, Badfighter-29 --Badfighter-29 (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Badfighter-29, Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Firstly, editors are humans (volunteers) who read and edit this online Encyclopedia. If you see a page not written with neutrality, you should probably edit them and remove contents that seems to promote them.
You can list them here for me to review. Thanks! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Re Talk:Aziz ul Haq (Pakistani activist) edit

Could you please clarify your closure? You said the consensus makes way for Aziz ul Haq to remain independent and not a dab to Azizul Haque, but then moved that page anyway, which doesn't make sense. I don't think anyone, myself included, wanted a WP:MISPLACED situation. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pppery, you should ignore the closure message at this time because I thought @DeloarAkram, and the other editor supported not to dab to Azizul Haque. There is no problem there, I saw you reverted the dab you made earlier; it's also good you came first to clarify. I will place that to dab since a line cited in the article said, "Aziz ul Haq (24 January 1939 – 28 May 1972), also called Dr. Azizul Haque or Aziz-ul Haque, was a Marxist–Leninist communist activist from Pakistan and one of the notable literary icons of Pak Tea House". Thanks and I appreciate! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
So, the consensus of that discussion is that Aziz ul Haq should redirect to the dab instead right? If that's the case you should clarify it at the discussion itself and implement it. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Pppery, I am about doing that. Just chill! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply