User talk:Omer123hussain/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history
You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Indian defence services
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Discussion to restart Indian collaborations of the month.
A discussion on INCOTM's talk page has been initiated. It includes various steps to be taken to keep the project alive and also regarding electing the coordinators. Please discuss. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of theaters and cinemas in Hyderabad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of theaters and cinemas in Hyderabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of theaters and cinemas in Hyderabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Triple Talaq in India. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.
The content you have added is infused with poor grammar and is pretty incomprehensible. As the editor wanting to make changes, it is your job to explain what changes you want and why. Please do not assume that Wikipedia is a private blog site. All content is written with the WP:consensus of the involved editors. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.May 2017
Your recent editing history at Triple Talaq in India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Category:Palaces of Nizam has been nominated for discussion
Category:Palaces of Nizam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 15:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Nizam Palace (Kolkata)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nizam Palace (Kolkata), Omer123hussain!
Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
If possible, kindly add more sources. Thanks again.
To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
—usernamekiran(talk) 13:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Precious four years!
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Omer123hussain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)
Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
- (a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
- (b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
- Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
- Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nizam of Hyderabad. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions reminder
Please note that you have been alerted about the ARBIPA sanctions and the Nizam of Hyderabad page is covered under the sanctions. You are expected to know and apply all the relevant Wikipedia policies, especially when you have been pointed to them. Failure to follow policies will invite sanctions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Brother User:Kautilya3 it also applies to you to. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Project Tiger Writing Contest
In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
- Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
- List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
- Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
- For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Omer123hussain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
need your help. regarding a topic form history of hyd Sakura6977 (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Syeda Falak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syeda Falak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syeda Falak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandals1 (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Combined Andhra Pradesh moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Combined Andhra Pradesh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Sultan Abdullah bin Omar Al-Quaiti
Hello, Omer123hussain,
Thank you for creating Sultan Abdullah bin Omar Al-Quaiti.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Not a bad start, just need to improve the article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|James-the-Charizard}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
James-the-Charizard (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Combined Andhra Pradesh has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyderabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian independence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject India
Namaste, Omer123hussain. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Unable to edit
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am using office IP and it is blocked now, so I am unable to edit WP with my registered user id in office. Can someone guide me how to eidt with my user id if office IP is blocked. —Omer123hussain (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- To make that happen, you'd need to apply for Wikipedia:IP block exemption. Alternatively, you could try and convince the blocking admin to change the IP's block to a soft block so that it doesn't affect logged-in users, which may or may not be possible depending on the specifics of this particular case. 78.28.45.145 (talk) 09:25, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I thought this would interest you.
These were pogroms against Muslims, which were perpetrated in the aftermath of Operation Polo by Indian army units in league with Hindu rioters. The Sunderlal Committee report estimated that between 27,000 to 40,000 Muslims were killed.
I can't believe an article on this hasn't been created so far. I've quit Wikipedia, as daily life doesn't allow me time to work on articles. But if you would at least create a start-class article, it would be great. Thanks and regards! 95.84.92.152 (talk) 11:26, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyderabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uppal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Al Wahda Mall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Wahda Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Wahda Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge
|
|
Hello Omer123hussain. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}
Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC) |
Re access the importance of pages which are tagged very low in terms of importance.
Hello @Omer123hussain:,
Having gone through https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment, I want to ask you:
Is it doable for you to "re-access" the quality and importance scale of pages:
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_Osman_Ali_Khan
2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nizam_of_Hyderabad
also, having an understanding of the Hyderabad topics, can you suggest/take a call on what new page name should be? Should it be "Nizams of Hyderabad" OR "Nizam of Hyderabad" OR "Asaf Jahi dynasty"?
Thanks, Abbasquadir (talk) 12:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Abbasquadir, its so nice of you, yes [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_Osman_Ali_Khan]] is in my pipeline, due to busy schedule i could not focus, but for sure we will do it.
- Nizam of Hyderabad suits better as it was there title almost throughout the region. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 08:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Islamic Heritage of Hyderabad
I see you created Islamic Heritage of Hyderabad. It should be expanded. Also when you first created it you should have nominated it for WP:DYK. That means the article you create will be featured on the main page of wikipedia and get thousands of views in a single day. Even now, if you expand it 5 times, you can do the WP:DYK nomination. I'll be happy to help with that.VR talk 02:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Vice regent: its really a constructive advise, will work on it. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 08:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mir Osman Ali Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hyderabad Media
Mh. Omer123hussain sorry for the inconvenience... from Hyderabad has 125 daily, weekly, English, and Telugu newspaper are published. I did not add all list of newspaper, only one newspaper is added by me... with reference.... for your kind reference/knowledge I am sending.. govt of India.... DAVP/BOC empaneled newspaper list link ----http://www.davp.nic.in/Upload/(S(2jbbpn45mseuinnqvddbx545))/davp_empanel_status.aspx... pl find and check all Telangana Newspaper list.... if you want to know more about media... I will feel obliged — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susheelgiri (talk • contribs) 10:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Mh. Shahab for one information more... The Siasat Daily, and The Munsif Daily Urdu newspaper is not exist in Hyderabad.... only the name Siasta and Munsif---- Urdu news paper is exist as per GOVt of India and RNI record and newspaper. if you need document i will mail you for your reference... Susheelgiri (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, @Susheelgiri: I appreciate your initiative to discuss, and I am glad to see your interest in editing Hyderabad, unfortunately some conditions were set during FA and considering those I removed your sourced text, we can keep only three newspaper each from English, Telugu and Urdu-(the common languages in the City). Any way rather than deleting I moved your details to related article Media in Hyderabad. Hope you understand this norms and cooperate. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Parnam Mh Sahab, @Omer123hussain:, I am not agree with your points, because.... Wikipedia is a free knowledge platform and we restrict with nos... Pl rethink on it....Susheelgiri (talk) 11:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Trichinopoly (1743), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnatic.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Trichinopoly (1743) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Omer123hussain (talk) 07:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahboob Ali Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diwan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Siege of Trichinopoly (1743)
Hello! Your submission of Siege of Trichinopoly (1743) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not directly edit Wikipedia:Good article nominations
Omer123hussain, the GA nominations page is built by a bot, which bases it off of the various {{GA nominee}} templates on article talk pages and the individual review pages that link to those templates. You should never need to edit it. Anything you edit on the page will be overwritten by the bot, which runs every 20 minutes, plus or minus, and indeed, you risk colliding with it if you try to edit it at the same time it's doing an update. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying, I was not aware. Will be cautious next time Omer123hussain (talk) 22:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I just took a look at the nomination template, which was in the wrong place on the talk page, so I've moved it to where it belongs, which is at the top, and without a special section or sig, just the GA nominee template (which has the sig information inside it). WP:GANI has the GA nomination instructions, and a lot of generally useful information on the process as a whole. Best of luck on your nomination! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks @BlueMoonset: for your advice and appreciate your kind gesture, I got confused while nominating through mobile. :)- Omer123hussain (talk) 08:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Trichinopoly (1743)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Trichinopoly (1743) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, it will nice to work with you Omer123hussain (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Trichinopoly (1743), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berar.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Siege of Trichinopoly (1743)
The article Siege of Trichinopoly (1743) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Siege of Trichinopoly (1743) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Trichinopoly (1743), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gateway.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Siege of Trichinopoly (1743)
On 1 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Trichinopoly (1743), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Maratha Empire's direct rule came to an end in the Carnatic region when Murari Rao surrendered to Nizam I after the 1743 siege of Trichinopoly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Trichinopoly (1743). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Siege of Trichinopoly (1743)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page 2000 Hyderabad floods has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-repeat-of-2000-floods-the-four-days-hyderabad-stood-still/story-ecWIeaJwyyZtQAGvRYQ4RN.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review GirthSummit (blether) 13:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm confused Omer123hussain - you've been here long enough to know not to copy/paste content, that article was verbatim identical to a Hindustan Times article, with just the addition of a few sentences. Plus the tone was all wrong - we don't write like journalists ("This scenario would have been one of déjà vu for Hyderabadis" - seriously?). What's going on? GirthSummit (blether) 13:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- I got busy, will c/e now :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- User:Girth Summit, is there any option to move it to sandbox, so that i can c/e it. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Omer123hussain, hi. No, I'm afraid not. WP:COPYVIO applies to all spaces. We can't host copyright violations anywhere on Wikipedia. If you want to copy from sources in order to put together an article, you need to do it offline and upload here only when it's entirely rewritten in your own words. GirthSummit (blether) 16:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- User:Girth Summit thanks for your advise, it got messed up due to some other work, no worries will rewrite it. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Omer123hussain, hi. No, I'm afraid not. WP:COPYVIO applies to all spaces. We can't host copyright violations anywhere on Wikipedia. If you want to copy from sources in order to put together an article, you need to do it offline and upload here only when it's entirely rewritten in your own words. GirthSummit (blether) 16:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- User:Girth Summit, is there any option to move it to sandbox, so that i can c/e it. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- I got busy, will c/e now :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Hyderabadi biryani
Thanks for your work on the Hyderabadi biryani article. Unfortunately, much of your contributions has been written in a style that isn't consistent with Wikipedia norms. In particular, it is almost never appropriate to use use peacock terms like "meticulously prepared", "careful process", "pinnacle of x cuisine", and flowery language like "quintessential to the birth of biryani". --Macrakis (talk) 16:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mah Laqa Bai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I
Hi Omer123hussain
Your recent edits[1] toNizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I have left a lot of errors in the references: see all the red error messages at Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I#References.
Please can you either clean that up, or revert your changes. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl:, thanks for your observation, i was still working on that, any way its corrected now.--Omer123hussain (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, but it is not corrected. Still 2 ref errors: see current version https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nizam-ul-Mulk,_Asaf_Jah_I&oldid=1041781428. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deccani mushaira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Important information
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please note: India is a featured article. It is Wikipedia's oldest country featured article, now 17 years old. Please be respectful of the dozens, indeed hundreds of editors, whose views and edits have gone into creating both the choice of topics and the weight given to them, indeed even to the very phrasing. If you examine the talk page archives, you will see that one sentence in the lead about the partition of India and the population transfer and mortality accompanying it took weeks of discussion. You cannot keep engaging in what is looking like edit warring to achieve your ends. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on India. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on India. Please stop and use the Talk Page to discuss the changes you think are required. Graham Beards (talk) 10:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Graham Beards: what was wrong with my work? :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 10:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I haven't read it, but I have noticed you are edit waring. I suggest you read WP:BRD.Graham Beards (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Graham Beards:; my work is being selectivly reverted, making me to stop editing on the article India, where as other users keep adding. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is never a good reason to edit war. It is best to take a step back and return to the article later.Graham Beards (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Graham Beards:; my work is being selectivly reverted, making me to stop editing on the article India, where as other users keep adding. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I haven't read it, but I have noticed you are edit waring. I suggest you read WP:BRD.Graham Beards (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Graham Beards: what was wrong with my work? :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 10:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I came to give you the same advice. I know you're acting in good faith but edit warring is a dangerous game on Wikipedia (regardless of whether you're right or wrong). The best way to deal with selective reverts is to raise the issue on the article talk page (one at a time is best) and see what sort of reaction you get. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CMD (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Omer123hussain. There may still be time for you to acknowledge your 3RR violation and agree to wait for consensus on Talk:India before making further changes. Otherwise a block of your account seems likely. The complaint about you is at WP:AN3#User:Omer123hussain reported by User:Chipmunkdavis (Result: ) EdJohnston (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2021 (UTC)