Mishra18Hex

Don Thompson (racing driver) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Don Thompson (racing driver), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, especially since it's a biography of a living person. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 20:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Don Thompson (racing) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Thompson (racing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Thompson (racing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello Mishra18Hex. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mishra18Hex. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mishra18Hex|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
Please stop creating articles in or moving drafts to main space when they are unreferenced, or are simply about topics that fail WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove Templates for discussion notices from templates or remove other people's comments in Templates for discussion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion or merging on the appropriate page. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Mishra18Hex, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mishra18Hex|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaltreider Motorsports

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kaltreider Motorsports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Eric Nascimento moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eric Nascimento, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Ed Bull moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ed Bull, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Ron Vandermeir Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ron Vandermeir Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Chuck Hiers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chuck Hiers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Atwell Racing

Template:Atwell Racing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Vandermeir Jr. (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Vandermeir Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ron Vandermeir Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 23:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Mishra18Hex! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 23:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ayrton Ori for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayrton Ori is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayrton Ori until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tanner Arms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanner Arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Chuck Buchanan Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuck Buchanan Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Buchanan Jr. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 02:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

• @Mishra18Hex: You need to join this discussion. There are serious concerns being raised about your editing history. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Unreferenced biographies of living people

Mishra18Hex, I see at the top of this page you were told that Don Thompson (racing driver) had been moved to draft space because it had no references to reliable sources, and that this was particularly concerning since it is a biography of a living person. You ignored this concern and moved it back to mainspace unchanged. The point should have been made more forcefully. Until I added two databases, that article was entirely unreferenced. New articles are expected to have at least one reference on creation, preferably two or three. There should be no unsourced information in articles. And in particular, all biographies of living persons (BLPs) created after 18 March 2010 must have reliable sources, or they are subject to deletion. We have a process for challenging such articles, proposed deletion; Kirbanzo was kind enough to instead draftify your article so you could add sources. But it turns out you have created other similar articles. At a minimum, you need to add a source verifying the details of the person's career as included in the article, and if you have included a birth date, the source must verify that too. Unreferenced information in articles on living people is subject to immediate removal, whether it's positive, negative, or neutral. Please add sources to your articles as soon as possible. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mishra18Hex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm very sorry guys, but I want to add the correct info, and not cause you to do this nonsense!

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand what was wrong with your edits. Yamla (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to explain that you understand why you were blocked and how you are going to change your editing in order to address these issues. Please be specific. See the ANI discussion linked above that you completely ignored. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ron Vandermeir Jr.

Hello, Mishra18Hex,

Thank you for creating Ron Vandermeir Jr..

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to satisfy notability for sport. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of Hylton Motorsport Page

The Hylton Motorsport page was deleted and replaced with a page relevant to Brad Smith Motorsport. Hylton Motorsport was a South Carolina-based LLC. There is no legal operational continituity with Brad Smith Motorsport Saigon1968 (talk) 02:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Landon Pembelton

Hello, Mishra18Hex. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Landon Pembelton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Landon Pembelton

Hello, Mishra18Hex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Landon Pembelton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Las Vegas Street Circuit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Las Vegas Street Circuit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Vegas Street Circuit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A7V2 (talk) 00:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ed Bull

Hello, Mishra18Hex. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ed Bull, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eric Nascimento

Hello, Mishra18Hex. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eric Nascimento, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ed Bull

Hello, Mishra18Hex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ed Bull".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Nascimento

Hello, Mishra18Hex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Nascimento".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)