Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 12 April 14 >

April 13 edit

Template:WHM color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Wuhan Metro. Gonnym (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TJM color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tianjin Metro. Gonnym (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of the Mexican Revolution edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline that already is covered by the Mexican Revolution article already. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Royal Navy Ships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that's more decorative than anything else. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portugal geography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not related to geography in the truest sense. Just lists districts and regions of Portugal which is already covered either by Template:Portugal topics, Template:Districts and autonomous regions of Portugal, and/or Template:Regions of Portugal. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atwell Racing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This navigation template is surplus to requirements. There is nothing substantial to navigate between 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I have just had to restore this template which was moved and blanked by the creating editor, thus removing the deletion template and seeking to either prevent deletion or the discussion of deletion 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Doesn't offer anything practical to navigate between. Bsoyka (talk) 03:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kecskeméti TE squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated navbox for the Hungarian football club. No players currently on the team from their website have an article on the English Wikipedia. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - outdated and due to level the club plays at, even if we knew who the players were it would be full of redlinks and not merited. GiantSnowman 09:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per GS. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused military rank and insignia templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused military rank templates. Don't see the point in having templates for countries that are not members of the NATO alliance. Just takes up space for no point since all of these were created and haven't been transcluded anywhere. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I think I nominated the NATO warrant officer templates (the ranks are not actually classified by NATO as warrant officer pay grade despite the native names) a long time ago before, kind of forgot what happened. I am not active in this space anymore but I am definitely for deleting unused stuff.--Officer781 (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Girl Meets World edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Need at least a dozen links for a category or template to be useful. Especially when you consider episode and character lists don't belong on here, this template is useless. It's useless, regardless. Amaury • 04:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dubious? edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 20. ✗plicit 11:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Qingdao F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

team is defunct; no need for a current squad template. Qby (talk) 08:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - defunct club = no current squad = no need for a 'current squad' template. GiantSnowman 09:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete we don't keep current squad templates for defunct teams. If team exists again in the future, then and only then, it can be recreated. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AthleteTimeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. ✗plicit 14:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created in 2020, used only in one user sandbox page. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am the creator of this template. I might pick this project up again at a later date. I would like to request that we postpone for one year. If there are regulations for deletions, then I am not inclined to challenge any decision. Bamkin (talk) 03:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Women's cricket national team squads edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National teams don't really have a "current squad" in the same way as a domestic team does - it varies from series to series, and neither of these templates have been updated consistently, so are massively out-of-date. No equivalent templates exist for other women's national teams that I can see (or for men's teams). Just does not seem to be a coherent enough category to warrant a template - at least the current squad sections on national team pages can include an explanation of inclusion criteria. Mpk662 (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coconut Records edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two articles for albums for a solo project that already link to and from one another, so this navbox does not provide any additional navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wuhan Metro line name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by template:rail color box Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy/Anthropoidipes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused taxonomy template for a cryptid that has not been shown to exist or have existed. It is, appropriately, not used at Bigfoot and can easily be recreated if that cryptid is proved to exist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WWW.BILLYMEIERUFOCASE.COM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G2. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template appears to advertise Billy Meiers quarterly newsletter. It is used exclusively for disruptive editing at Billy Meier. JimRenge (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this even requires a discussion and speedy deletion can just be requested, as per WP:VANDALISM / WP:DE. Amaury • 18:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 18:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_13&oldid=1083894230"