Hello Junoongrill! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal/Ronz (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Junoongrill, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Junoongrill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


A lengthy welcome edit

Hi Junoongrill. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Added citation" edit

Please do not use the edit summary "added citation" when all you have done is add an internal link (wikilink). A wikilink is something very different from a citation. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 05:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020 edit

  Hi Junoongrill! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 19:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of sex symbols, you may be blocked from editing. Editing against consensus, poor sourcing possibly in BLP matters Drmies (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You have made a substantial amount of edits to List of sex symbols so much so that the list is a mess of indiscriminate BLP violations. All edits regarding blps must be reliably sourced and in cases like lists or categories they must be WP:DEFINING. A one off "this person is sexy!" in a listicle is neither of those things and most of the additions you've made are very poorly or outright incorrectly sourced, including your latest edit where the subject refutes such titles. Please be aware of WP:BLP and take extra caution with your sourcing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing List of sex symbols for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Please use the article talk page to request changes and ensure that you review the many messages and links provided to you here in order to educate yourself regarding reliable sources. If the poor sourcing continues when the block expires, I imagine you will find yourself blocked from the article indefinitely.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit