License tagging for Image:DaB.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:DaB.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

          • Done now, it was an album cover

Image:SeasickSteve.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:SeasickSteve.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 01:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not an admin, so when or if the image is deleted is not up to me. If it does get deleted, absolutely you can re-upload it when you get the permission. —Chowbok 19:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi, in case you don't have Image:SeasickSteve.jpg on your watchlist, I've responded at Image talk:SeasickSteve.jpg about how to proceed. I've taken the speedy tag off for the moment, pending a response from the photographer. —Angr 14:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
P.S. The same goes for your friend who is the photographer of Image:WomadFlags.jpg. She has to agree to its being used for any purpose--including commercial reuse!--for it to be used at Wikipedia. If she could agree to one of the Creative Commons licenses I mentioned at Image talk:SeasickSteve.jpg, that would be great. —Angr 14:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Northwich edit

You have to be an admin to protect pages. Note that simply adding the {{protected}} tag does not work. See WP:RPP if you want top make a request to get the article protected.  YDAM TALK 20:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, i don't know that, thanks for telling me.JimHxn 11:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
The same kind of linkspammers are currently altering many pages concerning Cheshire-related things. It seems like we have to put up with them, until it gets intense enough to trigger some kind of threshold for pages to be semi-protected. I hope this helps.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've noticed that you live in the Northwich area. I have been trying to make a point for the inclusion of an article on the larger Northwich community including places like Weaverham, Hartford, Davenham, Rudheath etc.. but Ddstretch won't accept that it exists!! If you have any opinion on the subject I would be greatful if you could post it on the Northwich discussion pages under suggestions towards improvement. Thanks Northwicher 16:50, 19 January 2009

Possible project or sub-project dealing with Cheshire edit

Hello, it is me again. I've noticed that you've been active in trying to combat vandalism of a Cheshire town's entry. Although your work on Wikipedia is, as I can see, mostly concerned with music, I wondered if you would be at all interested in a (sub-)project I've proposed? I've listed a proposed project concerning Cheshire on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals. I think it can easily co-exist with Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography. If you are interested in contributing to this proposed project, even in just making small contributions at this time, please add your name to list at the appropriate place. You can have a broader discussion about it here. Many thanks.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

New project concerned with Cheshire edit

Thanks for showing an interest in a new project about all things concerning Cheshire. I've set up a project page, and its associated talk now, which you can see here. It would be really good if you were able to join the project by adding your name to the project page, and adding the project page to your watchlist. Please feel free to contribute to setting up the project page for example, by joining in or creating discussions you can find on the talk page. Looking forward to seeing you there.  DDStretch  (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it's been two months and there's still no word on a free license for Image:SeasickSteve.jpg so I've retagged it for deletion as a replaceable fair-use image. —Angr 13:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

H edit

In response to your edit of User:Gregh, asking if the h stands for Hilton, you are correct. I attended Weaverham High School. How did you find my username on here and how did you know of me? Gregh 15:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm Jim Hickson, i'm in year 11 now...but i have no idea how i stumbled across your user area.....straaaange. I know you just cos i do, you're like the master of sports, becky diamonds boyfriend...how the hell do i know all this?! Rick Lloyd talks about you often maybe thats where... JimHxn 16:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gregh"

I don't recognise the name "Jim Hickson", but I would probably recognise your face. Yeah I'm Becky's boyfriend (still, haha). Who's Rick Lloyd? Do you mean Richard, or...? As for master of sports, mhmm, strange. I was pretty good at athletics but I certainly didn't care for sports. I'm more academic than that. Where have you got that idea from? If its easier to talk to me on MSN messenger rather than me keep ruining your wikipedia page then add me at gregthegod@hotmail.com Gregh 11:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well i dunno i just pieced info from different places, although i'm pretty sure you were the computer geek? Richard Lloyd fat one, glasses, extremly violent, especially when it comes to rugby. And nah, i didn't really know you, there's no point, don't mind you writin on here. JimHxn 14:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah I was the "computer geek", though not so unsociable as the title 'geek' suggests. I seemed to be one of the first to introduce proxy servers which apparently hadn't happened before at Weaverham, so that got me a bollocking. And yeah, I know Richard Lloyd. So are you a 'computer geek'? Not many computer-illiterate people frequent wikipedia. Also, how are the GCSEs? You very intelligent or...? Predicted grades? Gregh 15:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Cheap.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Cheap.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tellyaddict 17:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Firin in Fouta.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Firin in Fouta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Seasick Steve Cheap album edit

This is detail stuff, but here I go anyway:

I noticed you wrote the Dog House Music article. I myself was working on the chronology of the albums in the Seasick Steve article. I noticed you decided on '2005' for the Cheap album. In the 2006 interview (see external links at Seasick Steve) they say '2004'. Do you have a source that says 2005? Key to the city 23:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nuru-Kane-One.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Nuru-Kane-One.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OzoFillmore.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:OzoFillmore.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaB alternate.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:DaB alternate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaaraJBoomerang.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:DaaraJBoomerang.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mustt.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mustt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sigil Kane.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Sigil Kane.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BoomerangFrench.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BoomerangFrench.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

17. Dan Magnusson

Evening- I came across your page as I saw you had done some editing on the Seasick Steve article. I did a stub for Dan Magnusson, Steve's drummer who drummed with him on the first album (with the Level Devils) and who is currently recording on his new album as well- included all this plus a link to the LDs webpage as a source for verification- and some prick has gone ahead and deleted it. As he is a professional musician supporting one of hte biggest acts currently in the UK, imho hes notable- could you maybe have a look and if possible reestablish the article including any features which will prevent the same happening again? Many thanks. -->rob77 —Preceding comment was added at 13:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Yup, thats me. Interesting- I am not trying to argue with you I hasten to add! But presumably by the rationale, the members of say Iron Maiden shouldn't have individual pages unless they had done something notable as individuals? Seems to be a very illogical application of the rules here! Cheers for your help anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob77 (talkcontribs) 14:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Chiweshe.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Chiweshe.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 12:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Daara J edit

Hi I have restructured the article, all these paragraphs need building up, also follow the updated advise given on the talk page and it should get GA. The other user seems to be takig a break, you seem to be the other contributer. If you have time please give it a shot and renominate the article. Cheers Realist2 (talk) 21:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Big chill logo.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Big chill logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seasick Steve edit

Jim, Good work on tidying up Seasick Steve's page and getting the album title right- my attempt at an info box down the bottom needs more work! I would like to get a bit more biographical info if possible, especially date of birth which I haven't managed to find anywhere (believe hes 68) so he could be properly referenced biographically. Rob (talk) 00:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem re the dob, have to respect that obviously. You could maybe consider breaking the article down a bit into sub-headings more, perhaps looking at how each album has changed musically, ie from group to just him and back to group again- just an idea if you want to expand it a bit. Rob (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Seasick Steve discography? edit

Just because an artist should have a discography on another page, only when it has released more than ten albums (may include other appearances in which the artist, have recorded albums with other bands). =/ Regards, Cannibaloki 20:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Oye 045.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Oye 045.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Nuru Kane Guimbri.jpg edit

I wanted to personally thank you for uploading this great image. Did you take the photograph? I am the original uploader of another image of a guembri, File:Mahmoud_Guinia.jpg. I am curious if these are the only two images depicting the instrument on Wikipedia. Viriditas (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there
Thanks, yeah, i did take the picture, i think it was 2006. I've always been a keen photographer, but I have shakes which means i can't usually get many good ones. For me, Nuru Kane was the best act of the festival (Africa Oyé), I really want to see him again, but unfortunately he hasn't played local since :(
JimHxn (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Delivered on 19 January 2009 by Nev1. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add two *s by your username on the Project Mainpage.


Questionnaire edit

In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.

1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?
Answer:
2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?
Answer:
3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?
Answer:
4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?
Answer:
4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?
Answer:
5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)
Answer:
6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?
Answer:
7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?
Answer:
8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?
Answer:

Fair use rationale for File:Dhol foundation.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dhol foundation.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.104.182 (talk) 02:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Sigil Kane.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Sigil Kane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Discussion on linking to streamed copies of albums edit

Wikipedia policy allows us to link to legal streamed copies of albums. It would be useful to draw up a guideline on how and when to link to such albums; however, there is concern that it may not be appropriate as the music would not be available in all parts of the world. Is the benefit of having access to the music for most users outweighed by the fact that some users will follow a link to find the music is not playable in their region? Your view would be helpful at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. SilkTork ✔Tea time 02:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Whirl-y-gig logo.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Whirl-y-gig logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ntah?.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ntah?.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carolina Herrera (disambiguation) edit

 

The article Carolina Herrera (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecesary disambiguation page. Carolina Herrera can link Astrid Carolina Herrera instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Drum-Believable edit

 

The article Drum-Believable has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. versacespaceleave a message! 14:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Drum believable.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Drum believable.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:JH&JK.jpg edit

 

The file File:JH&JK.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused fan selfie. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply