User talk:Jeffrd10/Archive 1

Archive 1

Don't forget to sign on talk pages

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:Act like a sticky wikit, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks for letting me know Jeffrd10 (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Vorilong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

And most of all please refrain from leaving thoughtless messages like the above on the talk pages of people who actually improve articles. Removing a claim that someone influenced someone else who was long dead before the supposed influencer was born is not vandalism. I suggest that you stop doing any vandal patrolling until you can stop biting the newbies with your ill thought out actions.--88.108.48.141 (talk) 09:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for the reply. The thing to be aware of is that this sort of warning message is often the first thing that a new editor sees and mistakes can reduce their willingness to participate further. Wrong-headed administrative action is probably the biggest cause for the loss of potentially good editors but careless use of automated tools is up there too. For your information, I became aware of your revert through this thread on Wikipediocracy. It demonstrates how easy it is for information about you (in this case your age) to appear elsewhere in the web after you leave it on the user page. It's a reason why sometimes young people's names and pictures get removed from their user pages. I don't know whether Mentifesto related to the Wikipediocracy post.--88.108.48.141 (talk) 19:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Jeffrd10, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- Mentifisto 11:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

infobox Song Duk-ki

Hi Jeffrd10! Thank you for your help! In the article Song Duk-ki, I would like to insert this infobox:

{{Infobox martial artist | name = Song Duk-ki, 송덕기 | image = | image_size = | caption = | birth_name = | birth_date = (1893-01-19)January 19, 1893 | birth_place = Seoul, Korea | death_date = July 23, 1987(1987-07-23) (aged 94) | death_place = | death_cause = | other_names = Song Deok-gi, Song Dok-ki | residence = South Korea | nationality = South Korea | style = Taekkyon | stance = | trainer = Im Ho | rank = Grandmaster | years_active = | occupation = | university = | spouse = | relatives = | students = [[Shin Hans-seung] and many others | club = | school = | url = | footnotes = | updated = 2013-05-08}}

However, it just does not come out as it is supposed to be. I copied this box from the article Hwang Kee. Actually, I did not change much, just some of the values, of course. Did I delete an important character? I cannot find the error... Thanks again! --88.71.20.139 (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Curious edit

Hi -- this is an odd edit. I presume you accidentally hit a wrong button somewhere, but I wish I understood how that edit summary got there. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Decomposition have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at Fraggle81's talk page.
Message added 17:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fraggle81 (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

CVUA Assignment 1

Firt of all, welcome to the CVUA! I am pleased to be your instructor and help you get all the needed skills to fight vandalism. Also, you can feel free to ask me about anything related to Wikipedia, since I've been here for a long time and may be able to give you the answers :) Below is your first assignment; when you're finished, let me know.

Assignment:

• Read Wikipedia:Vandalism in detail.
• Find an example of at least 5 types of vandalism.

Cheers. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 17:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Jeffrd10. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Jeffrd10, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and -- t numbermaniac c 05:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your revert

Any reason you restored vandalism that I reverted, then templated me for making an unconstructive edit? — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:30, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

• Same here, related to Lucas Fox International Properties. Please be more careful. Much more careful. Perhaps it's best to lay off the semi-automatic "vandalism" reverter. Drmies (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 16:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

• OK, that's too many mistakes. I've removed rollback until you have proven that you can be trusted with the tool. I'm not the brains of the outfit, but I think you just disabled IGLOO? That is a good move. Please take your time and look at edits and their context before you revert. You may reapply for rollback whenever you like, but my suggestion is that you wait a while and do it by hand for the time being. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reporting vandals to WP:AIV. Bearian (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

For reversing edits on the page of Baba Amte. Thanks -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks

    Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia, Jeffrd10! Those are nice cookies, and I hope to help out around here some more. :P

Tritario (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

resubmit

Hello, I'm working on the resubmit here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/classivox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.33.226.200 (talk) 15:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I am trying to report evident vandalism

When a Featured Article says that uranium is swine piss, someone vandalized it.12.228.46.48 (talk) 14:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

sorry about that mistake for some reason my anti-vandal tool Chopped of the top part of the coment so all I saw was this "content "Usually, you can find Uranium at your local Walmart, or if you're lucky, CVS. Uranium isn't a metal at all. In fact, it's a swine's penis." (I don't know who put it in.)12.228.46.48 (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)" so the content looked like vandlism. My Mistake thanks for fighting vandalism on wikipedia.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

No wurrries.12.228.46.48 (talk) 14:39, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

SORRY ABOUT THAT

I JUST GOT CARRIED AWAY WITH MYSELF AND USED A BAD WORD OR TWO. SORRY AND I AM GOING TO SIGN IT LIKE I AM SUPPOSED TO TOO 107.10.35.75 (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Jeffrd10! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Pratyya (Hello!) 05:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

War Horse

I noticed that you recently undid some vandalism on the page War Horse. (Good for you!) Despite this the vandalism (OL KASE) is still there, however when I click the edit button, it is not there. Can you look into it, please? Sincerely,

   67.169.164.218 (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Some bedtime reading for you

Hi. I have noticed that you are interested in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia. There is some absolutely essential reading for you: here, here, and here. Happy reading, and if you would kike to discuss any of it, don't hesitate to either leave a note on their talk pages or or contact me directly. Cheers, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

thanks a lot for these text they will be helpful for me.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 03:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good job in reverting vandalism! Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

thank you for giving me this honer its nice to have a talk page message that isn't a Ip vandalizing my talk page --Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Not Constructive

Hello,

You recently undid one of my edits and you said it was because my information wasn't constructive. Can you explain how it wasn't constructive? I was adding new information to the page that wasn't there before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.13.13 (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

the edit didn't look constructive to me please read wp:cheat. for more info.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm still confused by what you mean by constructive...are you saying it wasn't formatted correctly or something? Can you please be more specific? I just want to add more details about my sorority. Any advice/help would be greatly appreciated.

i am sorry but the edit wasn't properly formatted in wikitext.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks! I'll make sure to properly edit it this time and to preview it before saving it. Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.13.13 (talk) 21:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

I ate your cookie

I dream of horses has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:12, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

sorry to trouble you, but I need your help against this vandal...

... who has been removing massive content here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hakka_people&diff=580633166&oldid=580632447

- Ujongbakuto (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Helping newbies and copyright violations

This edit, in which you "helped a newbie," restored a copyright violation that a couple of editors had previously removed. Please be more careful in the future. ElKevbo (talk) 01:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

oh Hey thanks the reason that the edit summery was helping was helping a newbie was i thought that his edit was being reverted to to wiki markup mistakes. Didn't look carefully at the edit to see that it was a Cut&past edit and was not trying to repost copyright issues. thank for the heads up. Happy editing!--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Schiavo info box

I have no objections to adding an info box on the legal case, as long as the info box on Terri is not removed or moved too far down the article. Ace-o-aces (talk) 19:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

thanks for the reply The whole info box problem is complocaded because half the article is written like a cout case article and the other half seems to be a biography. --Jeffrd10 (talk) 21:15, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dust storm

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dust storm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 07:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dust storm

The article Dust storm you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dust storm for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Article creation note (from IRC help channel conversation)

Hi Jeff. I noticed a few minutes ago that you gave a user in the #wikipedia-en-help channel inaccurate information. I tried to bring it up to you on IRC, but your connection pinged out, so I'm posting here to make sure you get the correction. You told a helpee a few minutes ago that until they had twenty edits, their account wouldn't be autoconfirmed, and that until their account was autoconfirmed, they couldn't create an article. Neither of those things is true - the +autoconfirmed userright is assigned after 10 edits and 4 days (unless the user has the IP block exempt right as well), and any account, whether autoconfirmed or not, can create articlespace pages. The only users not able to create articlespace pages are IPs. Please, please in the future make sure that the information you give to helpees is accurate. If you aren't sure of something, check the policy onwiki before you say it. If you don't know something, don't say that you do. You're not obligated to try to help people who you don't have the expertise to help; people come to the help channel to get help from people who know how things work, and it's worse than useless for "helpers" to give wrong facts. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

sorry about the wrong information the dudes account was 2 weeks old so i thought that he didn't need to know about the 4 day waiting period and for the 20 edit thing that was my bad i misclicked because i was typing 2 fast but then when i noticed my mistake it was to late to tell him. --Jeffrd10 (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alter ego

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alter ego. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Please comment on Talk:Graph partition

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Graph partition. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Egypt

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Egypt. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nutation

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nutation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on User talk:Synsepalum2013

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Synsepalum2013. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Baader-Meinhof phenomenon

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Firewall (physics)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Firewall (physics). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electrical telegraph

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electrical telegraph. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/RFC on medical disclaimer

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/RFC on medical disclaimer. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour Party Rule Book

Please can I ask you to expand your closing rationale for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour Party Rule Book? Specifically, I'm very surprised that you found a consensus to keep by anything other than vote counting. There were delete rationales given in my nomination and by AllyD, and a rebuttal to TIYAN's keep (whether it was successfully rebutted or not is a judgement call obviously). The other keeps were completely without rationale at all, even when specifically asked for. Finally the long comment by PWilkinson was, as I read it, arguing that a notable article on this topic could possibly be written but that this article contained none of what such an article would require.

I know I'm biased in this, but I'm completely failing to see how that was a strong consensus for anything - relisting again, no consensus or weak delete I could see as reasonable outcomes, but certainly not an unexplained strong keep.

For the record that this was a non-admin closure is not part of the reason I'm disagreeing with this. Thryduulf (talk) 10:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stone of Losses

Please note that when performing non-admin AfD discussion closures, it's important to add part of the AfD template from the article to the article's talk page (e.g. {{Old AfD multi|page=The Stone of Losses|date=13 January 2014|result='''keep'''}}), and that it needs to state the result of the close. After this, then the AfD template needs to be removed from the article. I've performed this for you at:

• The Stone of Losses – See diff page
• Talk:The Stone of Losses – See diff page

Please review and follow the procedures in entirety listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions

Also, please read in entirety:

• Non-administrator closure
• Wikipedia:Non-admin closure

Thank you for your consideration. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour Party Rule Book

I've corrected some matters here too. Please note that the Archive top template goes at the very top of the discussion, above the header (diff). It's also very important to remove the AfD categorization template when closing a discussion. I've performed this for you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour Party Rule Book, in which I've removed {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}.

I have also removed the AfD template from the Labour Party Rule Book article and added the {{Old AfD multi|page=Labour Party Rule Book|date=31 December 2013|result='''keep'''}} notice to the Talk:Labour Party Rule Book page for you. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LIFX

I've removed the AfD template from the LIFX article and added the AfD notice to the talk page at Talk:LIFX for you. In the future, please be sure to follow all of these steps. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you I'm still new to Non admin closers and need a bit of practice.Ill keep your comments in mind to help with future non admin closer. So thank you and Happy editing!--Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, and again, all of the instructions are located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and please also use {{subst:afd top}} and {{subst:afd bottom}} rather than the general archive templates. Stifle (talk) 14:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:German acupuncture trials

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:German acupuncture trials. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blood

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blood. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Carmel Moore deletion discussion

Hi Jeffrd10, I note that you are not a Wikipedia administrator, but might like to be one someday. Well, my name is Graemp, I am just a user but I do take time out to tackle over-zealous administrators and eat them for breakfast! Earlier today you got involved in a deletion discussion about Carmel Moore. Now I am not prepared to rule out the faint possibility that a 10 year old American boy might be knowledgeable about the British porn industry, but judging from your contribution, you did not impart any. Even someone with no knowledge of the subject can help the discussion if they can demonstrate a knowledge of wikipedia policies, but you didn't do this either as you merely repeated the policy headings of the administrator who started the discussion. There is nothing wrong with reading deletion discussions and then trying to assess the merits of the argument through WPs, but to do this constructively, it helps to wait and read more than just one comment from an administrator. Your early intervention concerned me as it immediately looked like something I had seen before - administrators ganging up on one side of a discussion. To me, this is akin to playground bullying and something that I have zero-tolerance of, much like you might have of vandalism. If ever you do become a wikipedia administrator, I hope you show greater restraint. Graemp (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok a few things: One The article sources were not sources that I would call Independent under WP:GNG. Second I don't see how the UK Adult Film and Television Awards are internationally recognised. Now maybe I don't know much about the porn industry But I'm allowed to Coment because I get the policies. I also didn't find the above comment civil so please keep your Comments about others Civil. Oh BTW I'm Fifteen and taking 3 college level courses and Im a Mathematical Biology.

I was going to leave it at that but your reply needs addressing - The article uses 5 sources. In my view three of those are clearly Independent sources, one is clearly not and the fifth source is inaccessible to me. Now that should be telling you something that you do not know as in accordance with the law in your country, all 5 sources should not be accessed by anyone who admits to being 15, (and indeed some would argue should be blocked to you) so there is no way that you should be able to form a sensible opinion on that point. As I said in my initial post to you, I think you are entitled to comment but have only offered brief statements about WPs that add nothing to a discussion. As regards civility, I don't see how you could possibly consider anything I said as un-civil. If you really do, and are offended, my advice to you is to steer well clear of discussions about adult related matters.Graemp (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok let me say this the article sources I don't even have to open to disprove notability. A youtube video the actors webpage and one or two articles from small news sources don't prove nobility to me .Also if I may ask why did you bring your concerns to me a Fiveteen year old who Commented delete instead of the user that Nominated the article.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The best way to deal with the nominator was in direct discussion at the point of friction. As I have said, it was nigh on impossible to respond to you in the same way because you did not present any case. I thought it was far better to address the issues with you in a more private area, hoping that you might learn something. I think this approach was the right one but alas it seems a futile one. Graemp (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, BTW if you do decide to continue to involve yourself in adult deletion discussions it will help you to know that IAFD, AFDB and BGAFD are all independent industry databases.Graemp (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

If I was you I would read the article AFD entry again because Nick Made Comments affirming that the article fails WP:GNG. Also I've Made my Desiton and there is nothing you can Do to stop me Usefully commenting on AFD.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:U.S. Holidays

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:U.S. Holidays. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Re:Gilliam

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at Gilliam's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Gilliam (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electricity

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electricity. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Auditory hallucination

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Auditory hallucination. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Glitch at ANI

Hi, Jeffrd10. I had to revert your last edit to ANI because of a glitch; unfortunately, the content of the page had been rolled back 3 days. Unfortunately, while I'd like to restore the change you intended, I can't figure out what it was. :/ The diff is not clear. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Its ok Ill just rewrite the post.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, and sorry again. Just to let you know, I've tracked the bug at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61319. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

WP:MOS-JA

Stop stalking my edits.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Its not stalking I saw your edit using an anti vandal tool and was unsure on whether or not it violated WP:NAC. So I got some opinions on IRC to at what point I reverted your edit. It seems to me that the edit was made not because you care about WP:NOTDEMOCRACY and WP:POLL But because you don't want the topic discussed.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

I originally stated my opposition to the straw poll in my comment in the section. Straw polls have no place in policy making on Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

That is true yet I get the feeling that closing the discussion under the guise of it being a straw poll is more of a front for you to close the discussion because you oppose of it.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 17:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Also Its not harassment I've done thing like this before to other editors And i'm not leading a vendetta against you. after the ANI feed that I stupidly stated I haven't Commented on any of the multiple ANI feeds about you or reverted any of your edits . Also I haven't been sitting at my computer Refreshing your user contribution page.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 17:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

This is not what I've been hearing.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for the help!!! Feodor Kuzmich (talk) 01:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BeerXML

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BeerXML. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — 10.4.1.125 (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyamoham (2nd nomination)

As the film's existence is not in question nor is their doubt that it is one by a notable director, How about a redirect to filmmaker K. G. George, specially in considering the difficulties inherent in finding coverage for pre-1990 Indian films? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

• Ok thanks for the message. Probably shouldn't have said The article is unsourced but said that the only source is the IMDB. So the article Doesn't make nobility by itself however I can see how a redirect to K.G. George would be a good alternative to deletion.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seahorse

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Seahorse. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of deletion discussion

A deletion discussion which you took part in, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Williams (Character), has been reopened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Williams due to the article in question being recreated under a slightly different title. G S Palmer (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Wikipelli

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. (t) Josve05a (c) 14:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that I'm testing a new anti-vandal tool and it some time does thing I don't meen. Did not mean to do that my mistake and Happy Editing! --Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Water fluoridation controversy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Water fluoridation controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2013–14 Thai political crisis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2013–14 Thai political crisis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey, new student

Hi, I added myself to be a student of yours at the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. Thanks. --Dendro†Naja^{Talk to me!} 07:47, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Just to let you know, DendroNaja has been banned for socking. See his user page for details. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

CVU Training

Hi there!

I am a user who would like to get started with counter vandalism! You are not in my time zone (3 hours ahead, all the other Pacific time trainers are inactive) but it shouldn't be a problem. Please get back to me ASAP! I can't wait to start learning from you! Akifumii^Talk 03:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi again. I have completed a few questions on my CVU talk page. I have not finished yet however, can you review my answers and make sure I am on the right track? Thanks. Akifumii^Talk 17:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at User talk:Akifumii/CVUA.
Message added -Akifumii^Talk 02:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there. I have actually completed my assignments however, I cant seem to find another "Good faith but unhelpful edit". You can take a look at my work on the talk page. I also have a few questions I hope you can answer.

1. I maybe would like to become a reviewer or rollback one day so can you add training to that too?

2. I have reverted a lot of vandalism in the past few days. Are my reverts legit and make sense to be reverted?

3. Can you be active online more often so I can reach you easily without having to wait or do you have other important things to do?

4. What happens if I fail 1 (or more) CVUA assignments?

5. About how long does CVUA training take to graduate?

Akifumii^Talk 02:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi akifumii I got a few answers to your questions.

1. I'll see what I can do to teach you about rollback and reviewing when the time comes. I think that It would be wise to get through the "Knowledge and Understanding of Concepts" and "communication" section of the syllabus before you get admin rollback. However if you want twinkle has a Rollback function just like or better then the admin rollback tool so you might want to give that a look.
2. your reverts are fine I wouldn't see any edit that would cause me or another editor concern.
3. I know I haven't been as active I could have been in the past few days some of that is a local festival that is happening today another thing is that I've been busy with some real world things(skywarn) however I should be on IRC from 16:00-17:00 GMT so feel free to ask questions then.
4. Failing an assignment won't be the end of the world And I won't send you back to wiki Kindergarten. If you fail an assignment Ill give you a few pointers and guidelines and let you redo the assignment. For me Education isn't about grades Its about learning and I much rather you fail an assignment and learn then pass an assignment and not learn anything.
5. The time it takes to complete The CVUA varies by teacher and student. With your enthusiasm and my guidendence I think where looking at a one or two months at the most. --Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I appreciate your help! Akifumii^Talk 13:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

What are some ways I can find "Good Faith edits"? Is there a certain tool I should use? Look at the recent changes page? Thanks. Akifumii^Talk 13:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at User talk:Akifumii/CVUA.
Message added -Akifumii^Talk 22:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have found 2 more good faith edits. Please review them when you have time! Akifumii^Talk 22:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

CVUA Instructor Request

Hi Jeffrd10. I'm -24. I have been looking around for an instructor for a while but none of them seem to be available. Do you have room to take one more student? I'm on UTC -7:00 (MST) and I can be on for most of the week. Thanks, -24^Talk 14:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! -24^Talk 22:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at User talk:Negative24/CVUA.
Message added --24^Talk 22:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please comment on Talk:Venomous snake

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Venomous snake. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

CVUA Talkback

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at User talk:Negative24/CVUA.
Message added --24^Talk 00:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Note: I'll be going on a wikibreak soon because of finals and summer vacationing. I'll be able to do some small edits, so you can still post my CVUA assignments like normal. I'll be active again at the end of July. Thanks, -24^Talk 00:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at User talk:Negative24/CVUA.
Message added --24^Talk 21:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CVUA

Hi Jeff.

I would like to let you know that I would like to quit from your CVU training. I already have a pretty good understanding of countering vandalism and the culture of Wikipedia. I enjoyed taking your course (in only a few weeks) and don't think this training is necessary for me to continue. I have been granted rollback and reviewer by one of the admins here and promise to use it carefully. I plan to later become a trainer for the CVUA and mentor new students. Thank you for your time.  :) Akifumii (talk) 18:46, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

ok I completely understand If you want rollback and the like just do as much reverts as you can and then when you pass the 500 revert mark they should grant it to you. If you have any question feel free to still ask on my talk page.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi there Jeff. I already have these rights and they were granted by an admin who thought I deserved them and could use them well. Do you think it would be okay for me to start mentoring at CVUA? If not, what should I do first? Thanks. Akifumii^Talk 05:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

ok great. I think it is a good idea to wait a bit before you become an mentor. I waited untill have over 5000 edits to become an instructor. Also the CVUA also need more students than instructors so at this point i would just wait.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jeffrd10. You have new messages at Newyorkadam's talk page.
Message added 13:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Faizan 13:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I appreciate your help with Counter Vandalism. You deserve this. AkifumiiTalk 01:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Much WikiLove for your anti-vandalism efforts! Wikipedia is IMO one of mankind's greatest inventions, and vandals are likewise the greatest threat to it.

Bomb319 (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cdrtools

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cdrtools. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Median strip

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Median strip. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate election in North Carolina, 2014

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in North Carolina, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iatrogenesis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iatrogenesis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pectinidae

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pectinidae. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Constant folding

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Constant folding. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Mahfiruz

So you believe this false article, all this false history of this woman?

wow...well than ok...she was a native muslima and a native circassian and a relative to Handan and mahidevran sultan ...lol but this is not the truth and the members of the ottoman dynasty laughing about such selfmade stories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.112.141 (talk) 14:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

If you believe that the information is wrong you can rewrite the article if you can back up your claims with a reliable source however what you may not do is remove most of the sourced information without consensus or even an edit summary explaining your actions.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

There was before correct, but just there is written without any sources and if they have one this is a false selfmade source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.112.141 (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

User page message #1

(Chemeleon Circuit)

Why isn't it relevant? Both mentioned members have admited to having sex with girls that said no. And this means the band may no longer be together.

My information is relevant and on topic, and If you gonna abuse you power as an admin I will complain.

Your probably just a fan, who doesn't want to accept the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBlackParadeMCRAA (talk • contribs) 10:13, September 4, 2014

Thanks for your concern and not being passive when you think you're being abused. There are a few things you need to know however, First I am not an admin on the en-wiki however I would like to be one someday, Secondly we have very strict policies when it comes down to adding Information about living people. Wikipedia's policy on on information about living people In a nutshell is" Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research." So I think you can see how a unsourced statement such as "This is because members Edd Plant and Alex Day have been publicly shamed for being Paedophiles (Pervs, creeps, f***ed up people whatever you want to call them.)" would fail our WP:BLP policies on many fronts. Thank you for your concern and good luck editing.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

one more thing don't forget to add your signature by adding --~~~~ Thanks!--Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

User page message #2

MESSAGE FOR JEFFRD:

Hey Jeffrd you just deleted all the things I wrote on regarding the Freundlich equation. I am new to Wikipedia, Im not even sure how to MSG you so im writing on your "page". Im busy working on a project and dint have time to edit it nicely. The information I posted is relevant and correct... as far as I am concerned I added information to that page and you removed it. Why? You have time to make it nice then do so! Please put my information back up or organize the "Talk" thing you mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EngineeringEnigma (talk • contribs) 17:16, September 4, 2014

About user page messages

The above two comments were left on your user page. I moved them here. Do with them as you will. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dragon Gate, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

REPLY:

Their new unit name was announced at today's show: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.16.127.73 (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Latrodectus

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Latrodectus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Be more careful with the tools, please.[1] -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Shoot Not again Its a bug in the anti vandal tool I'm using vada. The bug is from lag and what happens is if you double click the revert button the tool will revert the edit you ment to revert and the edit next on the list. I've already reported this issue to the creator of the tool and I always take 2 looks at all edits before I revert edits. Sorry. --Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kiger Mustang

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kiger Mustang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nofel Izz

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nofel Izz. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm back!

I just want to let you know that I'm back from my Wikibreak. We can continue the CVUA lessons if you like. Thanks, -24^Talk 23:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeh sorry however as I moved up a grade this year and have found other interests so I haven't been on wikipedia as much as I was. Im sorry but I don't think i'll be able to teach CVUA lessons. Sorry.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ed Miliband

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ed Miliband. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

RfC United States same-sex marriage map

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Justin Blayney

Hello Jeffrd10. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Justin Blayney".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Justin Blayney}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 01:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Editing of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinlough> page

Hi Jeff,

I just received a message saying that I have been given a level one warning for editing the Kinlough page, changing its status from town to ghetto and adding a section about a ganga dealer called 'Gavin the Shnake'.

This was not me, nor do I think it was anyone who shares my IP address. I am a daily user of Wikipedia (often for several hours) and I think it is a brilliant resource. I wouldn't dream of making such ridiculous changes to it and 'trolling' the site in this manner. I'd be really grateful if you could recheck the details and make absolutely sure that an error has not been made.

For the record, I have never even been to Kinlough, and I know nothing about it. (Although I am from Leitrim).

Many thanks,

Sean Godley — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.79.204.93 (talk) 04:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

---

Thanks for your recent note, but I didn't post the edits you mentioned:

"Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fly because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jeffrd10 (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."

I used to have an account, but for some reason this year Wikipedia wouldn't let me sign on to that account no matter what I tried to do (even your admins couldn't help me!).

This was my old account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rosa_Lichtenstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.127.5.45 (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of forestry journals

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of forestry journals. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Attention deficit disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Attention deficit disorder. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Miss Cleo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Miss Cleo. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:C/1980 E1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:C/1980 E1. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:PlayStation 4 system software

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:PlayStation 4 system software. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:OpenIndiana

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:OpenIndiana. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)