August 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm IndianBio. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Baahubali: The Beginning, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 04:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome from Elspamo4

edit

  Welcome, 49.205.251.38!

Hello, 49.205.251.38, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Elspamo4, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Introduction
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, users like you are what makes Wikipedia such a great encyclopedia!
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (49.205.251.38) is used to identify you instead.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Elspamo4 (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Anarkali (2015 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Anarkali (2015 film). Diff: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anarkali_(2015_film)&diff=701574013&oldid=700750272 Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kali (2016 movie)

edit
 

The article Kali (2016 movie) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, and no notability, as well as WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --allthefoxes (Talk) 07:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's clear to me that you haven't bothered to read our guidelines on reliable sources, lest you would not have used Facebook as a reference here. The only suitable references are mainstream reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and a clear editorial policy. There's no way you could argue that the random Facebook page "Boxoffice of Malayalam Movies" qualifies. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:34, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Kali (2016 movie)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kali (2016 movie). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kali (2016 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kali (2016 film) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Happiest persoN (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pulimurugan. Diffs: [2] Unsourced changes, including financial data. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guppy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rohini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitled Mohanlal-Jr Ntr-Koratala Siva Project

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Untitled Mohanlal-Jr Ntr-Koratala Siva Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Obsolete. It's now titled

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Charles Turing (talk) 19:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Untitled Mohanlal-Jr Ntr-Koratala Siva Project listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Mohanlal-Jr Ntr-Koratala Siva Project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Mohanlal-Jr Ntr-Koratala Siva Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Charles Turing (talk) 07:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blogs as references

edit

Re: this, you have had ample opportunities to familiarize yourself with our reliable sourcing guidelines, what with the numerous links on your talk page and your three previous blocks to think about it. So consider this your last warning on the matter. Per WP:UGC, blogs may not be used references, because anyone can start a blog, call himself an expert, and publish whatever he wants. Onlookersmedia is a blog. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Mainstream newspapers, magazines, books written by established experts, that sort of thing. If you submit any more unsourced or poorly sourced content again, the account will be blocked for as long as it takes for you to become familiar with our sourcing guidelines and you will be unwelcome to edit for the duration of that block. You're not making the encyclopedia better by submitting poorly sourced content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Its me CJ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Velaiilla Pattadhari 2

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Velaiilla Pattadhari 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Future, unnoteable film

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Clubjustin Talkosphere 11:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2017

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sivakarthikeyan ‎ . Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 04:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Love Action Drama for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Action Drama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Action Drama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 04:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Love Action Drama moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Love Action Drama has been moved to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) (as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Action Drama) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Winged Blades Godric 04:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Its me CJ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Love Action Drama concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Love Action Drama, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Love Action Drama

edit
 

Hello, Its me CJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Action Drama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Its me CJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Project K (film) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Project K (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 14:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thameens Films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and RRR. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paappan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
The unacceptability of blogs has been clearly explained to you above - Arjayay (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply