Welcome!

edit

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Chauhan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 08:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chauhan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Chauhan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 08:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beldariya (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chauhan (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nonia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 12:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

But there is a caste named Nonia in Bihar Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 12:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chauhan Dynasty, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comment

edit

Please work on improving Draft:Chauhan (caste) instead of dumping draft-type material in article space. refs should be in-line and shouldn't be bare urls Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Unblock me sir Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Its Guddu Chauhan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ramgarh Chowk moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Ramgarh Chowk. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because the article does not follow Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Utopes (talk / cont) 09:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

what is problem Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Ariari

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ariari, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. Thank you for your work on Beldariya. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add the population with a ref from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes Ok sir Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Nonia Chauhan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nonia Chauhan. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Lonia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Lonia. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Admantine123 (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ramgarh Chowk

edit
 

The article Ramgarh Chowk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Improperly Sourced, Needs more sources to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seawolf35 (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Chauhan Bihar moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Chauhan Bihar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of EBC Caste Bihar

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EBC Caste Bihar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/bihar-caste-survey-the-importance-of-being-ebc-in-state-8965283/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because clear violation of WP:NPOV. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 15:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of "Beldari Language"

edit
 

Beldari Language, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Friendly notice

edit

Hello, I'm QuicoleJR. I noticed you have had a hard time making pages. Just so you know, Wikipedia and other wikis are not allowed as sources, so you should try to find other sources to use. This page has more information on which sources are good or bad to use. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Economically Backward Classes

edit

Hello Its Guddu Chauhan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Economically Backward Classes for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Justiyaya 17:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Beldari Language moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Beldari Language, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Admantine123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Beldar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Admantine123 (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beldar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Admantine123 (talk) 05:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Admantine123 (talk) 08:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Several problems with your editing are documented above, including persistent editing for promotional purposes and persistently adding unsourced (and in some cases highly questionable) material to articles, but a further concern is your repeatedly posting totally irrelevant material into articles. An example of that is your editing of the article Nonia which, as you know, is about a species of moth, but where you have posted material about an Indian caste. A review of your editing history removes any possibility of thinking that edits of that kind are merely careless errors: you clearly know full well what you are doing. I regard posting spam into an article on an unrelated topic like that as close to vandalism, and taking it in conjunction with your previous editing removes the need for "close to" in that description. Since blocking your account from editing for a short time failed to lead to any change in your approach, this time the block is for a longer period. If you persist in the same way you may well be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


  • If you decide to return to editing after the block is over, please provide edit summaries which give an indication of what your edits do. Giving no edit summary is unhelpful, and a vague edit summary such as "Small edit" is at best uninformative, and at worst grossly misleading, as for example in one case where you gave that summary for an edit which added more than 1700 characters to an article. JBW (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Unblock me please, this won't happen from now on. Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Its Guddu Chauhan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Will not make such mistake from now on

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Its Guddu Chauhan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry

Decline reason:

Apology accepted, but that's not a reason for unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Janwadi Party (Socialist)

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Janwadi Party (Socialist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Beldariya

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beldariya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Chauhan Bihar

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chauhan Bihar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan (draft 2)

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan (draft 2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Beldari Language

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beldari Language, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Beldariya (2)

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beldariya (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Chauhan Bihar

edit
 

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chauhan Bihar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Account unblock please

edit

Madam ji my account is blocked please unblock it please Itz Guddu Chauhan (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan (draft 2)

edit
 

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Beldari Language

edit
 

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beldari Language".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Beldariya (2)

edit
 

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beldariya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan

edit

  Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply