Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

Hello, you've been mentioned on WP:ANI. Regards --DIREKTOR (TALK) 00:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank You very much. You know what, I don't care, nor will I report you for accusing me of "right wing nationalist PoV", because I am brave enough to solve everything without help of the other people. Regards ;) HeadlessMaster (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

outing

edit
OK, I will. Happy new year, and sorry for breaking the rules. HeadlessMaster (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Many thanks! I personally nowadays dislike birthdays, but once the pandora box was opened in my page there was nothing I could do... but, it ended up being good as ocasion to contact other editors. :) Many thanks, feel free to poke me whenever you want. FkpCascais (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done

edit

Done: I inserted source about personality cult of Broz Tito.--Lord Sbur (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I invite you to stop vandalism of this guy on article! I inserted 14 fine new sources excluded Sunic! I invite your opinion here--Lord Sbur (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Present

edit

Merci. Takabeg (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Longest-Lived Leaders

edit

Even though I don't think either of the leaders you suggested qualify, please continue to search, as there are certainly leaders that I and other editors have missed. Cheers, Star Garnet (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rulers of Tokelau

edit

May I suggest that, instead of writing multiple one-line articles on Tokelau's politicians, you could write a single article with a small section on each of them? Pesky (talkstalk!) 07:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hails! Yeah, good suggestion, but I think it's impossible to revert everything right now. I really hadn't thought of that before ;) HeadlessMaster (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. In List of Gothic Fiction works, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page The Fiery Angel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Libya

edit

so the people in benghazi that started the revolution were foreign intervention, the people in misrata, in zawiya - if its was just foreign intervention wouldnt libya now be a hive of discontent? Not just abu salim and sirte - but all over the country. it wasn't a foreign ntervention. 92.13.94.44 (talk) 19:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

You misunderstood me, but I won't report you for rude words because I understand that my words could hurt you. Sorry for that. I hadn't said I don't support the people, but that it wasn't a revolution, but a civil war where people were backed by foreign forces. My country also had civil war versus communists and some other extremists in the early 90's and nobody refers to it as a "revolution" but as a "war", despite the fact that everybody supports it. Btw, we also had some help from the outside of the country. As stupid as it may sound, it isn't a revolution if there's an armed conflict, even if it started as a peaceful protests. I hope you understand what I want to say. HeadlessMaster (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Business Knowledge Corporation

edit

The t-portal piece on Business Knowledge Corporation poll seems dubious at best since the BKC does not appear to be involved in opinion polling of any sort. Do you have any other source for this poll? AGF, perhaps the name is misspelled or something?--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited List of high fantasy fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stardust (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Next Tunisian general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ennahda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Hi, I read your posts and I agree with your opinion! May you improve Broz's article with me and others? You can put your idea here: I know you are a balanced editor. Best wishes,--Alojow (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Next Tunisian general election‎

edit

Hi, thanks for updating the opinion polls, but could you add a source for the presidential election poll? ABJIKLAM I T I C 17:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Of course I can, I simply forgot, sorry for that :) HeadlessMaster (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for that swift correction :) ABJIKLAM I T I C 17:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem, thank you for noticing my mistake. :) HeadlessMaster (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

List of ongoing conflicts - Burma

edit

Please refrain from putting ceasefire in the section regarding the Burmese internal conflict. There is heavy fighting going on between the Kachin Independence Army and the Burmese military. There is no ceasefire in effect.XavierGreen (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pierre-René Lemas

edit
 

The article Pierre-René Lemas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ϢereSpielChequers 11:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assistance

edit

As you know, you are active in the page List of modern dictators, there was a huge edit war about 20-25 days ago in the page, i think that same or worse condition can be happened regarding the page once again, because the obsessive edit warrior have returned, remembering that the edits have been made by the same person which are only limited to self likeness and without making any discussion in talks. Kindly secure the page(or seek) and revert back to the one which i just had [1], point is same, since 16th june 2012 or since the discussion was stopped, not closed though. Thanks Clarificationgiven (talk) 12:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, good you know that we are having a few editors editing wikipedia for there own likeness, same edit warriors slandered this page too [2] either by misreading a source or by attempt to fool people, check the history, and many thanks for understanding such situation. Clarificationgiven (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi again, Funny thing is that before this all false creation of 'dictator' propaganda regarding Muammar Gaddafi which born after 22 Feb 2011 none of us ever regarded him as one before.. I mean compare the edits made before [3] [4] , and by 28 feb the page got inspired by the propaganda [5] . That's how it happened, and that's the point. Clarificationgiven (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sock puppets

edit

Where do I go to report Sock puppets ? I highly suspect user:Clarificationgiven of being a sock puppet of user:Justicejayant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.171.51 (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Filing a ban regarding this user, because he has edited 3 times, 2 times with the account "Zenithfel" and once with logging out. And he obviously don't know what 'sock puppet' means, or he is just trying to fool us. Clarificationgiven (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Zenithfel is my younger brother. We live in the same house in longisland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.171.51 (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
And shares same delusion, Thanks for the laugh.Clarificationgiven (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage

edit

Clarificationgiven (talk · contribs) has added the word "Libya" to your page, so that it now reads "I'm against wars in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan". I don't know if you agree with that or not, so I'm pointing it out here for you, and you can take whatever action you like (or none at all).  dalahäst (let's talk!) 09:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Gothic fiction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Viy and The Portrait (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gothic fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Undine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aaly Karashev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kyrgyz
Abdelmalek Sellal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Algerian
Zhantoro Satybaldiyev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kyrgyz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gothic Fiction works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lokis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Peter Isacksen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Jessie and Valerie
Allen Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Police Story

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Chinese films of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forever Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

List of longest lived state leaders

edit

I would enjoy your input at Talk:List of longest lived state leaders#Eight possible additions. Star Garnet (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dan Hildebrand

edit
 

The article Dan Hildebrand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article only has an IMDB source, which is counted as highly unreliable. Therefore, this is quite a poorly sourced biography article which - analogous with WP:BLPPROD - has got to go.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 21:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vince Conti for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vince Conti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Conti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoctorKubla (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rudy Bowman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Virginian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artem Okulov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weightlifting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Odessa People's Republic for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odessa People's Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odessa People's Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 23:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of gothic fiction works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of gothic fiction works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Foundling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aleksey Karyakin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stakhanov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of directors associated with art film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Ivory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of longest-living state leaders for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of longest-living state leaders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest-living state leaders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of the oldest living state leaders for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the oldest living state leaders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the oldest living state leaders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 23:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, StjepanHR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of film director and actor collaborations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George O'Brien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Alfonso Lovo Cordero

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. StjepanHR, thanks for creating Alfonso Lovo Cordero!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. All articles on living people need their references WP:INLINECITED.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Helena Vuković

edit
 

The article Helena Vuković has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable competitor junior success only

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 09:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ashley Miller (director)

edit
 

The article Ashley Miller (director) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable director, didn't meet GNG nor WP:DIRECTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — Ammarpad (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, StjepanHR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Alexander Veledinsky) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Alexander Veledinsky, StjepanHR!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job. Page however needs expansion.

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 08:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Grigori Aronov) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Grigori Aronov, StjepanHR!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time to create this article. The page needs to be expanded, however.

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 08:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

edit

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to January 16 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, StjepanHR. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kemal Malovčić

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kemal Malovčić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ToeFungii (talk) 12:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia

edit

  Hi StjepanHR! Thank you for your edits to The Castle of Otranto. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Gothic fiction into that page, and while you are welcome to do so, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 12:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of oldest living state leaders for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of oldest living state leaders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of oldest living state leaders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dronebogus (talk) 09:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply