User talk:Gunkarta/Archive 04

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cpt.a.haddock in topic Shailendra vs. Sailendra

May 2013 edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Melayu Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Dravidian  Hero  17:04, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I recently had a discussion about bumiputeras with an Indonesian guy. So maybe I am bit over sensitive with Malays now, but looking at your contribution incl allegations of Tamil nationalism targeting non-Tamil writers only, it's pretty obvious that you are trying to cleanse Tamil culture from Malaysia, bumiputera style. And let me tell you the difference between etymology and dictionary. Etymology follows the history of the word looking for the real meaning, and a dictionary simply lists words of a language with the present meaning. There are however "etymological dictionaries" you could use. So unless you have no source like the listed ones, don't insert your original research. You should use the talkpage of the articles to discuss any possible changes.-- Dravidian  Hero  12:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh–Indonesia relations edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bangladesh–Indonesia relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

MATAKIN edit

Can you translate this article into English or at least create a stub on English wikipedia?

http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majelis_Tinggi_Agama_Konghucu_Indonesia

I have an English language source I want to use here

The Origins of Confucianism as an Organized Religion in Java, 1900-1923 Charles A. Coppel Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 12, No. 1, Ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia (Mar., 1981), pp. 179-196 Published by: Cambridge University Press Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20070420

Rajmaan (talk) 21:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

bilateral articles edit

Firstly good work on creating many notable articles. However, please avoid blatant POV in articles such as "Both the countries have many cultural proximities and similar view on international issues" or have cordial relations etc. thanks. LibStar (talk) 13:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

you've used " both nations enjoys cordial and friendly relationship" at least 5 times, this is blatant POV. I also note you've added a few uncited statements to new articles, please provide citations or I will remove. Thanks. LibStar (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

copyright violation edit

Hello Gunkarta, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Indonesia–Uzbekistan relations has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I know you keep creating new articles but have you considered spending your time on fixing up the significant copyright violations on articles already created? I'm still finding a lot. LibStar (talk) 08:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
hi, I've noticed you've continued to create new articles, whilst that is fine, it would be appreciated if you fix up some of your old articles. thanks. LibStar (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oops, sorry! edit

I accidentally removed the rendang infobox! Thanks for reverting it back.--Rochelimit (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Indonesia–Iran relations edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Indonesia–Iran relations, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from see talk, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Indonesia–Iran relations saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Indonesia–Uzbekistan relations edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Indonesia–Uzbekistan relations, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.kbri-tashkent.go.id/?page_id=74, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Indonesia–Uzbekistan relations saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

the new "type" of monument edit

is, in my view, better than the "icon" version, but what is there now,

Buildings designed as landmarks, usually built with extraordinary feature such as tallest, largest or distinctive design – such as the Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest structure as the landmark of Dubai

is perhaps crossing the border into opinion and/or original research. It appears to me that this is a definition that you have generated pretty much on your own to keep that building in the monument category. It would be a good idea to add a reference to that type of monument, especially if it is going to be the first type. Read the definition that begins the monument article and then think about how this type fits it. I am not sure that it does. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Island resort edit

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Gunkarta, thanks for creating Island resort!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Some issues edit

Some of the english in Australian-Indonesian relations is either by a machine or a non native speaker, lots of small bits need checking carefully - also Ngawen - very confusing in parts, repetitious and not enough citations or where the info comes from - but, dont give up, wikipedia can be a very unfriendly place at times, you just have to live with it. terlalu banyak londo kurang faham... dan lain lain... satusuro 09:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Indonesia–Suriname relations edit

Hi, I'm 1bandsaw. Gunkarta, thanks for creating Indonesia–Suriname relations!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is an interesting start for understanding the relationship of former colonies in the modern era. More sources would help provide a broader understanding.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. 1bandsaw (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Help needed edit

Hi Gunkarta,

How do you say these phrases in Indonesian:


Thankyou very much for your wonderful translation effort!
I am very Grateful.
May you be blessed and be prosperous!
Yours sincerely,


--A-eng (talk) 09:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Inter-Ethnic Relations edit

I in no way meant to paint Indonesia as a violent society, and I apologize if it seemed like I was trying to do so. My objections to the sentence were simply premised off of what I believe to be confusing and contradictory elements within the sentence (which CorinneSD clarified). Sorry if I offended you!Rwenonah (talk) 18:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

mudah-mudahan edit

transcription dalam bahasa inggeris sekarang? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalasan_inscription

I recognise the first line, masih sama untuk orang buddha sekarang, tetapi - yang lain :)

please... satusuro 09:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If you're feeling froggy edit

Check out Erwiana Sulistyaningsih. I started this a few days ago, it needs a better name and a little help in details. If you read the local languages maybe you as can help expand on the info and add some sources that I can't! If you can't or don't have time that's cool but since you edit in that area I thought it might make sense ;) Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Geologic Clock with events and periods.svg edit

Gunkarta, mengingat Anda dulu pernah bikin berkas svg tentang peta kekuasaan Majapahit, bisa nggak Anda bikin versi Bahasa Indonesia dari berkas ini ? Masalahnya berkas tersebut dipakai di artikel yang jadi AP sehingga sedikit janggal jika berkas tersebut masih berbahasa Inggris. Terima kasih --Erik Fastman (talk) 06:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  The SVG Barnstar
Terima kasih atas pembuatan berkasnya, nih saya kasih Barnstar untuk Anda --Erik Fastman (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

name of 1999 massacres edit

What is the name of the 1999 massacres in Kalimantan against Madurese? It happened before the Sampit conflict, and involved both Malays and Dayaks attacking Madurese. A new article needs to be created about it. Or a general article called Anti-Madurese violence documenting all incidents of attacks on Madurese since the 1960s to today. Talk:Sampit_conflict. Rajmaan (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2014

Pictures edit

Hi Gunkarta,

I notice you have loads of picture of skycrappers in Jakarta, is it possible for you to help me to fulfil the image of this listing? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Jakarta [User:Bungutebungute|Bungutebungute]](talk) 20:30, 23 February 2014

Hindu Buddhist edit

There should be an article linked for a category like that - as there are many issues as to what the dominant factors in any of those kingdoms were, and what evidence exists - some were more one way or the other as well. satusuro 12:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey I didnt want an essay of a reply - I was just suggesting we needed a link to an article for the category... (I was just this morning checking in a university library about the 'zaman pangeran diponegoro' - so please mohon maaf - tak mahu separti buku besar in reply) - just an idea of which article to link to....

And please what is the source for calling mataram=medang - it seems odd to me... satusuro 13:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Indonesian names edit

I saw your recent edits to Indonesian names. I think perhaps you have added too many Arabic names. I think there should just be a few. They are examples. I don't think an exhaustive list is necessary. CorinneSD (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

12 March 2014 edit

 
Hello, Gunkarta. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonderful Indonesia.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WOWIndian Talk 12:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Tondano edit

Hi, I'm Jnanaranjan sahu. Gunkarta, thanks for creating Tondano!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some references to the articles so that it will be considered as reliable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. J Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 09:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Halo mas Gun :) edit

Ya udahlah klo mank ga pantas untuk dimuat di wiki -_- tapi thx buat perhatiannya :D klo misal aq ada kesalahan grammar, bantu memperbaiki ya, thx :) Okkisafire (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nggak apa2 kok. Cuman, aq kan kebiasaan menulis artikel tentang legenda begitu, jadi penelitiannya aq anggap saja sama spt legenda :D tapi seriusan nggak apa-apa. Okkisafire (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Gambar batik edit

Halo Mas Gun,

Terima kasih atas bantuan anda di artikel batik akhir-akhir ini. Saya sekarang tengah berbicara dengan User:Chiswick Chap agar artikel batik dapat menjadi Good Article. Menurutnya di User talk:Chiswick Chap, gambar utama yang sekarang itu kurang bagus karena batiknya sendiri menjadi kurang kelihatan dan lebih baik diganti menjadi gambar yang anda revert. Tapi memang saya juga kurang sreg dengan gambar itu sebagai gambar utama. Bagaimana kalau untuk sementara gambar utamanya diganti dulu, nanti kalau sudah jadi good article diganti balik? Saya tanya dulu biar gambarnya nanti gak gonta-ganti. Terima kasih Alteaven (talk) 13:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

No, we can't have an edit-war about the lead image and conspire to put it back how it was after the GA is done, that's not acceptable and would lead to a GAR to revoke the GA and possibly to additional measures, please don't even think about it. The current image is unattractive; the museum image not very informative. The featured image was better but in fact at only medium resolution. Perhaps we can find a better image; a composite could be a solution (3 or 4 batiks of different pattern), or an image of batik being made, provided some sort of pattern can be seen. I am scanning some photographs now; we may find something acceptable among them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
@ Chiswick. Ok, terribly sorry about that ._." Let me know if you're finished Alteaven (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Indonesia–Jordan relations) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Indonesia–Jordan relations, Gunkarta!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Gunkarta, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hasteur (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Indonesia–Yemen relations edit

Hi Gunkarta, I need your help in the bilateral relations article "Indonesia–Yemen relations".

Asian cuisine / List of Asian cuisines edit

I note that you are a significant editor of Asian cuisine. Last year List of Asian cuisines was created, which duplicates the content and purpose of the Asian cuisine list article. Do you see any value in keeping both? The Asian cuisine list article is in a poor state with little information other than unsourced opinion, and is cluttered with too many images, and red links, while List of Asian cuisines is sourced, informative, and better organised. My feeling is that there is little content to be saved in Asian cuisine, and that it might be more useful to redirect the title to List of Asian cuisines (or vice versa). Essentially, keep one article, and work on that. What do you think? SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lee788 reported by User:Gunkarta (Result: ). Thank you.  Gunkarta  talk  15:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I fail to understand what is your intention User:Lee788 on posting my own message for you in my own page? Gunkarta  talk  23:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for rewriting the Bruneian Empire article, as well for your works on Indonesian foreign relations. ;) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ʜᴜʜ? 23:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ki Hajar Dewantara edit

I worked on the article on Ki Hajar Dewantara in October 2013, but I've noticed that some material seems to have been added since then that was written by a non-native speaker of English. If you have time, perhaps you could work on this article to put it into standard English. Normally, I could do that, but it is so bad that I think someone familiar with Indonesian would do a better job. CorinneSD (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

list of monarchs of java edit

is quite a long list of rulers - some quite imaginary ( no WP:V, WP:RS or anything to support their existence ) - thanks for providing a link - any extra links where articles havent been linked is appreciated. if it was a good list - it should have small/brief summaries of the specific kingdom/monarchy/whatever - rather than links in the headings (which is not a WP:MOS accepted practice) - it would be much easier to understand. satusuro 08:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Gunkarta/sandbox edit

 

Hello Gunkarta. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Gunkarta/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C679 20:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


Sultanate of Mataram edit

The article is making so many claims for authority - with not a WP:CITE or WP:RS tied in anywhere. It might need to be very drastically edited. Indonesian history articles with inadequate referencing must comply with WP:V - not playful Indonesian etymology - that is we think this, therefore it is true - as an online encyclopedia, Sultanat of Mataram article has gone far too long unchecked. Selamat tahun baru satusuro 04:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

mohon maaf kalau saya terlalu keras dengan sejarah istimewa. My apology if I seem somewhat rough with lack of wp:cite. Also - it seems the old website joglosemar whatever, is no longer in existence, and many small articles used to rely on it - are you aware of alternative online history sources? satusuro 05:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oh dear, kesulitan besar....
  • "Mataram, Historical kingdom, Indonesia". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 1 January 2015.

We normally do not used EB as a source... very sorry, but, it is not a usual reference. Not too sure what to say. satusuro 01:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Very sorry - the images of Senopati, Sultan Agung - are not what professional historians call valid images of the individuals - it is a long and complicated discussion if you want it - just because Indonesian persons think/believe that the images represent what the person look like, they are not considered valid. If you want the conversation, fine, if not, please do not re-insert. satusuro 02:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • OK there is a fine line/ tempat kesulitan ? / where adding that image is a serious problem, this is an english online encyclopedia project, and readers are going to believe that the image you have uploaded is valid.

For me to not revert your edits - you need to speak. Due to the very good safeguards we have on wp en - we have a range of guidelines regarding WP:AGF - however silence does not help. No response does not help. satusuro 02:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK - give me a few days - there are issues with a lot of things, but I do not have a whole day or long stretch of time to systematically go through the problem of the article - or the image of sultan agung - it might even take me a week or two to have the time to properly compose a rather complex argument/explanation.

Mohom maaf kalau saya offend over any sensitivity regarding javanese history - I am not an expert/ahli, but... satusuro 13:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bali Kingdom edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bali Kingdom, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.inforapid.org/index.php?search=Sri%20Kesari%20Warmadewa.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed it. It will be expanded and elaborated soon. Gunkarta  talk  10:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Hello Gunkarta, and thanks for this article. It looks like you are using paragraphs from various Wikipedia articles as part of this article. This is perfectly fine, since Wikipedia content is free to re-use, but our license also requires attribution, that is: saying where that text came from so the edit history can be preserved. (Even if, as I've found, you were one of the original contributors of that text in the other articles, after a while other people edit it here and there, and it is that history we need to track.) So if I may ask, in future if you re-use content from other articles, if you can make the edit summary for that edit say something like "Content used from (article name), see that page for attribution" that's all that is needed to keep the license good.
  • I've gone through and identified some of those additions here and I can put tags on the talk page that do the same thing after-the-fact, so again no problem there. Thanks again for your work, and feel free to ask if you have any questions, CrowCaw 23:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Zheng He edit

You reverted the article to a version that said he was born in 1971. And the article clearly says, with reliable sources, "Zheng He was born into a Muslim family.[6][9][10] However, his religious beliefs became all-embracing and eclectic in his adulthood". So we can't call him a Muslim. Dougweller (talk) 10:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015 edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Soto (food). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Huon (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I don't meant to, just his insistence and editing guerrilla just keep going on and on. Promised not to do it again. Gunkarta  talk  16:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Military history of Indonesia) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Military history of Indonesia, Gunkarta!

Wikipedia editor Lakun.patra just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great Work !!!!

To reply, leave a comment on Lakun.patra's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Stir fried water spinach) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Stir fried water spinach, Gunkarta!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good, thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Kaasstengels) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Kaasstengels, Gunkarta!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Prajnaparamita of Java) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Prajnaparamita of Java, Gunkarta!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great, thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kue edit

 
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Jajan Pasar in Jakarta edit.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 21:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Empu and pandai besi edit

Sorry about my edit on the kris article. I actually felt that pandai besi was more inclusive since the word empu is less common outside Indonesia. I'll retain the word empu but can I make a few minor corrections? For one, there are some unnecesary bolds in the beginning of the article. Also, for the sake of style, I replaced some mentions of the word empu with the English "smith" or "blacksmith". This is done simply for the sake of avoiding repetitiveness. Is this alright with you? Morinae (talk) 12:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2019 Southeast Asian Games for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 Southeast Asian Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Southeast Asian Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boyconga278 (talk) 06:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply about Joko Widodo page edit

Thanks for your message today about recent changes to the Joko Widodo page. I agree that we should all aim for a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) on Wikipedia, especially when dealing with controversial issues such as Pak Jokowi's policies and approach. Many people feel strongly about many things. We should try to avoid these strong views affecting the Wiki pages. I agree with the approach you have been taking recently.

More broadly, there is a real risk that the Joko Widodo page will turn into a mess. There is so much controversy about so many things. The best thing that we can do -- in my view -- is try to stick to the main facts of his approach as President, and record the truly main events during his period as President. Otherwise the quality of the page will be lost. That would be a real pity because it is important to have a high-quality, factual page on the President of RI. Pmccawley (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I wish you would not continue to post political spin which merely pushes "myths" about Jokowi. For example the assertion that he is the first president not from a rich background is just wrong - Gus Dur led a modest existence and had to work for a living. Habibie was a trained aeronautical engineer and returned to that work after being president. Further examples you continue to put that Jokowi takes a hard line against drugs - but there is no evidence of that given his political concessions for clemency and his abject failure to target Indonesian drug cartels. You have been trying to post the myth that Jokowi is the only President to take action on fuel subsidies - but all former presidents have gradually reduced these in line with civil tolerance. You cite Jokowi believes this and Jokowi believes that - but these things are mere conjecture - for example Jokowi believes fuel subsidy cuts will fund infrastructure - is just political paff - especially when there is no palpable infrastructure development occurring - in fact its slowed under Jokowi following a very big infrastructure (particularly airports) under former president SBY. The proper approach for an encyclopedia is to reference actual occurences - not try to parrot Jokowi's narrative which is generally aimed at uneducated Indonesian peasants.Suastiastu (talk) 13:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jade Marcela for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Marcela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Marcela (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 08:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Gunkarta, makasih kamu jaga halaman Jokowi dari yg benci dia. Mereka bilang yg dukung dia pada bohong ttg karakter/tindakkannya selagi mereka yg maki2 terus dan sita hal2 yg baik ttg kepresidenannya. (sorry ini masuk bagian salah)Bookracoon (talk) 03:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kalpavriksha edit

It has been suggested that Kalpavriksha be merged with Wish Tree which is not desirable as Kalpavriksha is specific to Indian religious cosmology of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism. Wish tree also covers many other aspects like wells etc. Pl record your views on the talk page of the two articles.--Nvvchar. 08:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Shailendra vs. Sailendra edit

Hi, the article was previously using the IAST spelling of Śailēndra which IMO, is confusing. Ś is romanised further to Sh which is also used by reliable sources instead of Śailēndra. Thanks. --Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 16:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply