A barnstar for you! edit

  The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for helping to expand the band's article! Your help is very much appreciated. —Theopolisme (talk) 17:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Dubliners discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Liam Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Magistrates Court
The Best Of The Original Dubliners (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Irish
The Dunnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Linda Brown (singer) edit

 

The article Linda Brown (singer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Way2veers 00:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dubliners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McCann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Sheahan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Danu, Andy Irvine and Jim McCann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Jim McCann.jpg edit

Hi there- I'm afraid I've had to delete the above image, as it was licensed for non-commercial use only, and so counts as non-free for Wikipedia's purposes. Sorry about that- if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Jim McCann.jpeg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Jim McCann.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ronnie Drew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to TOTP
The Ludlows (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jim McCann

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Red Roses For Me (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cassette and The Rose
Dirty Old Town (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tommy Scott
The Rose (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cassette

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Inglewood sign.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Inglewood sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mystics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to David Kelly and David Blair
Finbar Lebowitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to America

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wood Lane Children's Home edit

 

The article Wood Lane Children's Home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sorry, but I don't believe that a single small home with no particularly interesting history is WP:NOTABLE, even though it's been mentioned in a couple of reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 10:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Saif al-Arab Gaddafi.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Saif al-Arab Gaddafi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ronnie Drew Discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |align="left"| '''''[[Pearls (Ronnie Drew album))]]'''''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ronnie Drew.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Ronnie Drew.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Luke Kelly discography edit

Hello, Grandpa152. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Luke Kelly discography, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Luke Kelly discography to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, MrScorch6200 (talk) 17:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Maids When Your Young Never Wed An Old Man.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Maids When Your Young Never Wed An Old Man.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for File:Maids When You're Young Never Wed An Old Man.jpg edit

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brendan Shine discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Play (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brendan Shine discography edit

 

The article Brendan Shine discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This discography article has multiple style issues, and is unnecessary, as the artist's more complete discography can already be found in his article, Brendan Shine#Discography.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mayast (talk) 17:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:The Dublin Legends - Formerly of The Dubliners 2013.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Dublin Legends - Formerly of The Dubliners 2013.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 레비Revicon 03:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dubliners, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Kelly and Gerry O'Connor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:The Dublin Legends - Formerly of The Dubliners 2013.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Dublin Legends - Formerly of The Dubliners 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 레비Revicon 09:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Revolution Tour (The Dubliners) edit

 

The article Revolution Tour (The Dubliners) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established here, and it might be better to merge this into a larger article on the band's tours.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dubliners 40 Years Anniversary Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McCann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 8 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dubliners 50 Years Anniversary Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim McCann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 15 Years On Tour edit

Hello Grandpa152,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 15 Years On Tour for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolution Tour (The Dubliners) edit

Hello Grandpa152,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Revolution Tour (The Dubliners) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Dubliners 40 Years Anniversary Tour edit

Hello Grandpa152,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Dubliners 40 Years Anniversary Tour for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Dubliners 25 Years Anniversary Tour edit

Hello Grandpa152,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Dubliners 25 Years Anniversary Tour for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Evening With The Dublin Legends: Live In Vienna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerry O'Connor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Late Late Show Tribute edit

Hello, Grandpa152, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on The Late Late Show Tribute, appears to be directly copied from http://www.allmusic.com/album/the-late-late-show-tribute-to-the-dubliners-mw0001240816. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on The Late Late Show Tribute if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 6 February edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Patsy Watchorn 2003.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Patsy Watchorn 2003.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Patsy Watchorn 2003.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Patsy Watchorn 2003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dissident Irish Republican campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Belfast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Maggs and Trish for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maggs and Trish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggs and Trish until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The articles Rachel Osler, The Dunnes, Trish Dunne and Linda Brown (singer) is also being considered for deletion as part of the same discussion., Eastmain (talkcontribs) 09:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Grandpa152: I've left a message for you at the deletion discussion about this. Thanks! — sparklism hey! 07:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dubliners Jim'll Fix It.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Dubliners Jim'll Fix It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rmm413 (talk) 01:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Rose Hothouse Flowers and Dubliners.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Rose Hothouse Flowers and Dubliners.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Patsy Watchorn 2003.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Patsy Watchorn 2003.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 11:17, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use of File:The Rose Hothouse Flowers and Dubliners.jpg edit

Hi Grandpa 152. The non-free use of image in The Rose (song)#The Dubliners version? was discussed at WP:NFCR#File:TheRoseCD1.jpg and File:TheRoseCD2.jpg. The opinion there was that the image did not satisfy all of the WP:NFCCP. You're more than welcome to particpate in the discussion and explain why you think the image should be used. Perhaps you can provide clarifiction as to why you believe the image satisfies WP:NFCC#8 and should be used. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Rose Hothouse Flowers and Dubliners.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Rose Hothouse Flowers and Dubliners.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Liam Jordan for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liam Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hillbillyholiday talk 22:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:The Ludlows.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Ludlows.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 00:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Eamonn Campbell Live.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eamonn Campbell Live.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 00:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Sean Cannon Live.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sean Cannon Live.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 00:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of On the Road (The Dubliners album) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On the Road (The Dubliners album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Road (The Dubliners album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thegreatluigi (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jenna Whyte edit

 

The article Jenna Whyte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NBIO. All the references are self-generated or PR pieces.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 03:31, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:The Dunnes 2013.jpg edit

 

The file File:The Dunnes 2013.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article An Evening with The Dublin Legends: Live in Vienna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage, never charted. Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:An Evening With The Dublin Legends 2014.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:An Evening With The Dublin Legends 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:The Dunnes Line Up 2013.png edit

 

The file File:The Dunnes Line Up 2013.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Maggs and Trish. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply