User talk:FlyingToaster/Archive 3

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Ser Amantio di Nicolao in topic Europe 10,000 Challenge invite


Letter To America edit

Letter To America has been proposed for deletion. An editor Awesimo 00:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC) felt this website might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (websites) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.Reply

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

My opinion is that Letter To America is indeed notable enough for a Wikipedia article based upon the size of its audience (you can check the Frappr map on the "LTA website", nomination and competition in several high-profile blog competitions such as the Irish Blog Awards, and notoriety of its creator, Jett Loe. In short, I think LTA has earned its place and is continuing to grow. FlyingToaster 07:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


FlyingToaster 03:50, 2 April 2007

SIGBOVIK edit

As much as I want SIGBOVIK to live a thousand years, as its only mentions come from Livejournals at the moment, do you think that section should perhaps be removed until there is some attributable source for the conference? In my opinion it would make sense to leave it in the links at the bottom... Sirmob 06:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Sirmob - I did attribute the "SIGBOVIK website" in the article. I'll assume you didn't see it, but if you did and don't feel this is enough please let me know. FlyingToaster 03:50, 2 April 2007
That's a self reference, obviously, even though I think I think it is reasonable to get away with leaving that link under external links. I gave a talk at SIGBOVIK today, it's not like I want to delete the information, but I think having the section on SIGBOVIK risks the page being deleted, which I also wouldn't want. And I suppose this is pretty close to a thing we made up in grad school one day, at least this time around :). Sirmob 07:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Indeed it is self-reference, and for SIGBOVIK I doubt anything better will surface. So, I'll leave it up to you whether to get rid of it or not. The sentence or two seems innocent enough, but if you feel it's approaching thing we made up in grad school one day deleteable level, please feel free to get rid of it.  :) FlyingToaster 07:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I sentence-ified the link reference at the end - and don't be so sure that "nothing better will surface," if we keep this up multiple years I suspect people will take note. And failing that, I suppose we could just talk to someone at The Tartan ;-) Sirmob 13:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: HOMOSEXUALS ARE GAY edit

I cannot tell you how embarassed I am about reverting the page back to its vandalized state. I have just been through a similar situation with another editor, and clearly need to be more careful about which versions I revert. My best guess as to what happened is either 1) both 68.50.239.168 and I tried to correct the article at the same time, or 2) I saw that the [Otherwise ungiven] edit summary for user 68.50.239.168 was described as "HOMOSEXUALS ARE GAY," I assumed that they had been the one commiting the vandalism, instead of correcting it. Though you probably already know this, it was as far as I can tell, anonymous user 58.165.154.122 who originally renamed that section. Either way, I'm very sorry for my carelessness, hope you forgive me, and thank you for correcting my mistake and bringing it to my attention. :) --Friginator 03:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

No worries mate, I've done that plenty in the past.  :) I should've known something was up, your talk page clearly isn't that of a vandal. Happy editing to you. -FlyingToaster (talk) 03:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Romes Begining edit

This article may be badly written, starting with the spelling and punctuation of the title, and may duplicate material in Rome, but how is it "unsalvageably incoherent with no meaningful content or history; it is patent nonsense." as your CSD states? CSD G1 does not cover "poor writing." Is there another basis for deletion? Thanks Edison (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edison - I'd say even with the spelling problems, this article is entirely a duplicate of the Rome article, which has an extensive section on its founding and the legend behind it. -FlyingToaster (talk) 04:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

johnny drama chase edit

dude, listen the ip address vandalized that PAGE. The johnny drama chase character is based off of Mark Wahlberg's cousin as stated in various interviews by him, Doug Ellin (creator of Entourage) and they show him Johnny Drama Alves the inspiration on the season 1 and season 2 extras.Tj21 (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem mate, sorry about the mixup. -FlyingToaster (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
its gets even the best of us at times. Tj21 (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

David Popescu edit

I just can't believe it got into the paper in Edmonton. Well, that and until I went to add it I didn't even realize that we had a standalone article on him rather than one blurb in a Sudbury municipal election article (though with the way User:CJCurrie's been beefing up the Sudbury municipal politics articles lately, I should have known...) Bearcat (talk) 23:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sensationalist news does better than it should or the subject deserves, I guess. I'm not even in Canada and nor following the Canadian election and this article was delivered to me via Digg. -FlyingToaster (talk) 23:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nah, I could totally believe this kind of thing getting international press if it happened in Toronto or Montreal or Vancouver. It just surprises me to see this kind of attention being focused on something that happened in Sudbury. For what it's worth, though, the guy already had the kind of reputation in Sudbury that even if all of the other candidates were killed by falling satellites tomorrow and he were the only name left on the ballot, he'd still lose. Bearcat (talk) 00:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

r-platypus edit

Thanks. I thought you handled the talk page entry well. Dlohcierekim 02:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Twinkle edit

Please be more careful/slow down tagging articles for speedy deletion, this one is obviously not nonsense but spam. Thank you, Matty (talk) 02:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey Matty. I see what you mean and agree that the article is spam. However, at some point a rather imprecise decision must be made over whether a spammy nonsense article is more spam or more nonsense.  :) -FlyingToaster (talk) 03:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

From Socraticsausage edit

Apologies regarding the ISO 15288 article if I have posted there incorrectly (it's my first post on Wikipedia). I can't work out what I did wrong - can you please explain to me what I have done, if necessary to my email richbynature@yahoo.com and then delete this comment to you as an cumbersome first attempt to get clarity on how I should post! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Socraticsausage (talkcontribs) 05:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

From Socraticsausage edit

Thanks for the note, explanation and edit. While I was flapping about I made some changes, went back and read your comment to me and re-edited the entry to read as you had suggested. I'll keep learning :) How did you know when 15288 was last edited? Do you work in the systems engineering field? (Socraticsausage (talk) 06:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC))Reply

No worries, as a systems engineer you probably have a lot of expertise Wikipedia could benefit from.  :) I do work as a programmer, but I definitely didn't know about ISO/IEC 15288 without Googling! -FlyingToaster (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

GTbyCitroen deletion edit

before i start i must say you jumped on it fast. no sooner had i finished it, it was gone!

However i wish to contest something. I was NOT advertising the car, nor did i intend to. I dont work for Citroen (to be honest i dont really like them). i just felt like it needed an article, or at least a mention

- flashkick101Flashkick101 (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey flashkick101. I agree that the GT is notable enough for a page, and if the style is re-written in a more neutral point of view with references it could be a great addition to Wikipedia. If you'd like to try again, I'm happy to edit the article and help out with references and style. -FlyingToaster (talk) 00:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: GTbyCitroen edit

Thanks that would help. I was my first asttempt at an article so i wasnt all too sure on how to word it, lay itout, etc. If you could make 'more neutral' that would be great. In the cars section on uk.msn.com, there is a feature about the Paris Motor Show. It has info on the car there.Flashkick101 (talk) 09:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

hot Shot Insecticide edit

Please can you explain why you slapped the tag on the page? It clealy says that it is under construction. Vandalismterminator (talk) 16:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey Vandalismterminator. I added the tag because I could not establish the notability of the subject after a few searches. If you'd like to contest that the subject is notable, please do so in the talk page. An external source would be useful to establish this. Thanks! -FlyingToaster (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem, I was in the requested pages and that was one of them. I was searching the internet to try and find information on it but was unable to find it so I will remove my hang on tag and let it be deleted. Vandalismterminator (talk) 16:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yo edit

How come you would just want to delete my article about my homies like that? It's an official group! Don't you want WikiPedia to have everything? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdrianPosse (talkcontribs) 19:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aviansie edit

Just a friendly note about your {{db-bio}} tag on Aviansie. The article isn't about a real person, so db-bio doesn't apply.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Connor bucka edit

Why do you have to delete perfectly true articles. let life be, what do you have to gain. everything except for editing current info is just more info, which you love. Special jeffrey (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Psychic edit

you say it was corrected, but my watchlist does not show that you have reverted yourself yet. Bob (QaBob) 05:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Bob (QaBob) 05:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

talkback edit

 
Hello, FlyingToaster. You have new messages at Fabrictramp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

hey —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin Tercourse (talkcontribs) 17:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Marking Patrolled edit

Please remember to mark pages as patrolled after review, especially after tagging CSD. Thanks. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 17:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey Jamesontai. Once I mark a page as CSD, the link to mark it as patrolled disappears. Is this not what typically happens? -FlyingToaster (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I just popped back over to take your talk page off my watch list, but I'll jump in anyways. I mark the page patrolled first, then apply tags. (CSD, maintenance, whatever). With Twinkle, you can apply the tags even from the page that comes up after marking as patrolled -- I assume that works with Huggle as well. If not, just hit the back button on your browser or reload the page. The only hitch is I have to make sure I don't get interrupted before I complete my tagging. If that's a possibility, I open the page in two different tabs in my browser -- one for tagging and one to mark as patrolled afterwards.
The reason it's important is that if you don't mark it as patrolled it will still show up as unpatrolled and someone else will have to re-patrol it. People get frustrated after coming across a few dozen of those. :) --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

18xx in India categories edit

You didn't see my answer - I agree it would be useless to leave the cats blank, but that is not what is being done. I will be going through the History of India to add cats. Maybe you could help to add in cats too. Ardfern (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy A2 edit

This is just to inform you that an article in a foreign language is speedable only if it is an exact copy of an article found in a foreign-language Wikipedia. Otherwise, it should be tagged {{notenglish}}.

Of course, if you understand a foreign language and see an article in that language that can be speedied under other criteria, those other criteria still apply. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 00:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Glyn Eithrym edit

Hi. Thanks for continuing to deal with Carrot18's antics. I noticed that they tried to recreate the article after it was speedily deleted. Carrot18 attempted to make "minor changes" to Myron Evans, but this amounted to posting Evans' version of his CV. The BLP stabilized to a biographical stub some 2 years ago, following a lot of activity at the time. This editor is clearly disruptive and is ignoring the rules of wikipedia, as far as sourcing is concerned. Many thanks, Mathsci (talk) 08:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

It seems that Carrot18 (talk · contribs) is Myron Evans according to this edit summary.[1] There is an obvious conflict of interest here. If he continues he should be reported at WP:AN/I. Mathsci (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good detective work. Let's stay on it - I'll make a note in his talk. -FlyingToaster (talk) 08:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

reply from MidKnighttheDarkHunter edit

(sorry about this mix up.) thank you so much! it's surprising how fast replies come! if you don't mind, it would be a pleasure to talk to you more!By the by, come by my page so we can discuss computers, games, etc. ( I guess people can call me a no0b, seeing as that's usually my nickname=))also, are you looking to adopt a person, 'cause I have no idea what I'm doing. 71.126.23.232 (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

reply from MidKnighttheDarkHunter edit

help! my page is still intact, but i think someone hacked my password!!! come to my new profile: MidKnightHunter. thanks!!! ='(71.126.23.232 (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

adoption edit

thank you so much for adopting me!!! but when I said help, I meant that I couldn't log in because Wiki says 'invalid password'. thanks, I'd love to chat at around 8:00 to 10:00 EST to begin, because I have some errands to run( check and refresh your page a lot, cause I still might be out, or I might fall asleep waiting). I'll edit your talk under a new section when I'm ready.=) And don't get me started on the gas prices. =) MidKnightHunter (talk) 21:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

ready? edit

let's chat! just post some q's on my talk, k? =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MidKnightHunter (talkcontribs) 00:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

okay edit

thanks for the info. can we talk in about an hour? also, can you provide a link to it? MidKnightHunter (talk) 00:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfA thanks edit

  Hello FlyingToaster. Thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for Adminship, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. Thingg 00:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Letter To America edit

Letter To America has been proposed for deletion. An editor Awesimo 00:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC) felt this website might not yet be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (websites) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.Reply

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

My opinion is that Letter To America is indeed notable enough for a Wikipedia article based upon the size of its audience (you can check the Frappr map on the "LTA website", nomination and competition in several high-profile blog competitions such as the Irish Blog Awards, and notoriety of its creator, Jett Loe. In short, I think LTA has earned its place and is continuing to grow. FlyingToaster 07:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

SIGBOVIK edit

As much as I want SIGBOVIK to live a thousand years, as its only mentions come from Livejournals at the moment, do you think that section should perhaps be removed until there is some attributable source for the conference? In my opinion it would make sense to leave it in the links at the bottom... Sirmob 06:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Sirmob - I did attribute the "SIGBOVIK website" in the article. I'll assume you didn't see it, but if you did and don't feel this is enough please let me know. FlyingToaster 03:50, 2 April 2007
That's a self reference, obviously, even though I think I think it is reasonable to get away with leaving that link under external links. I gave a talk at SIGBOVIK today, it's not like I want to delete the information, but I think having the section on SIGBOVIK risks the page being deleted, which I also wouldn't want. And I suppose this is pretty close to a thing we made up in grad school one day, at least this time around :). Sirmob 07:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Indeed it is self-reference, and for SIGBOVIK I doubt anything better will surface. So, I'll leave it up to you whether to get rid of it or not. The sentence or two seems innocent enough, but if you feel it's approaching thing we made up in grad school one day deleteable level, please feel free to get rid of it.  :) FlyingToaster 07:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I sentence-ified the link reference at the end - and don't be so sure that "nothing better will surface," if we keep this up multiple years I suspect people will take note. And failing that, I suppose we could just talk to someone at The Tartan ;-) Sirmob 13:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

simple Q edit

How do I make a new page? I know it sounds stupid, but really, how do I do it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MidKnightHunter (talkcontribs) 16:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the info edit

but where exactly is that chat channel or whatever? MidKnightHunter (talk) 17:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

sorry, can't edit

sorry, I really am, but I'm using up most of my memory, and most of it is game files that are irreplaceable. could we just leave messages on one another's talk? Sorry. (I play GMod too much, most memory is HL2, EP1,EP2, portal, and TF2 files, along with a bunch of modifications.)

MidKnightHunter (talk) 18:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks edit

thanks for saving my ass.I really appreciate it. You really must be the most awesome guy on Wikipedia. I mean, you adopted me, a common no0b, you take part in countless stuff, and your super nice, to boot! =) not trying to be retared-sounding or anything.] MidKnightHunter (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

wow! edit

when you said that your a girl, I definitely didn't expect that. by the by, do you play GMod? cause I am going to download it next saturday, EST. I would really like to meet you online. we could have some fun. also, if you are a girl,(no offense)how come on your user page it doesn't say you're one? Thingg did it. but yeah, anyways, thanks. and If you haven't noticed,(which I'm sure you have) I'm a guy. actually, on second thought, I really don't play online. MidKnightHunter (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

CSD Nom edit

FYI, I changed Dad for A Day to a redirect. I decided that although it was redundant (you are totally correct on that), it is a reasonable typo so the redirect would be appropriate. Cheers!  Frank  |  talk  19:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi edit

uh, hey, you on? cause I wanna talk to someone. MidKnightHunter (talk) 00:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks edit

for the encouragement. although, I didn't Know you had to request a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MidKnightHunter (talkcontribs) 00:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Question about new user edit

Hi, I notice that you left a comment on the talk page of "new" user William Tennant. I am concerned that this very active [2] and very political account may be a WP:SPA or even a role account aimed at sanitizing Republican scandals and blackening Democrats. For example:

  • Took Sarah Palin's "Troopergate" out of the category of "American political scandal" putting it into his newly-created subcategory "Alaska political scandal" [3]
  • Bill Clintons long-ago "Troopergate" is now an "Arkansas political scandal" but also keeps its position as an "American political scandal." [4]
  • Series of unflattering edits to Democrat Pete Stark [5]

I don't really know what to do about this, but I thought I would ask for your advice. Of course, maybe I just went over there and bit an innocent newbie whose POV happens to be different from my own. Markdepp (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

okay edit

I'll try to find that link to make one. I have the day off, so I don't know if you're at school or work. gonna see if thingg is on.O.o MidKnightHunter (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Uterine orgasm edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Uterine orgasm, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://books.google.com/books?id=ampGnXvEGLwC&dq=%22Uterine+orgasm%22&q=%22often+accompanied+by+physical+reactions+such+%22#v=onepage&q=rarely%20experienced%20by%20most%20women&f=false, http://www.abhisarika.com/SC/Glossary/Glossaryu.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Uterine orgasm saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Theleftorium (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hong Kong meetup edit

You're invited to the next Hong Kong meetup on 19 August in Think Cafe, Causeway Bay. Please sign up to the meetup on the meta meetup page. Hope to see you there! Deryck C. 16:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Poll on ArbCom resolution - Ireland article names edit

There is a poll taking place here on whether or not to extend the ArbCom binding resolution, which says there may be no page move discussions for Ireland,Republic of Ireland or Ireland (disambiguation), for a further two years. Fmph (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Quarter note.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Quarter note.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Placenta ad in Hong Kong.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Placenta ad in Hong Kong.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

San Francisco Wiknic 2012 edit

  San Francisco Wiknic at Golden Gate Park  
You are invited to the second Great American Wikinic taking place in Golden Gate Park, in San Francisco, on Saturday, June 23, 2012. We're still looking for input on planning activities, and thematic overtones. List your add yourself to the attendees list, and edit the picnic as you like. Max Klein {chat} 18:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/Invite.

You're invited: San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2! edit

San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2! You are invited!
The San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2 will be held on Saturday, June 16, 2012 at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco. Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join us! This event will be specifically geared around encouraging women to learn how to edit and contribute to Wikipedia. Workshops on copy-editing, article creation, and sourcing will be hosted. Bring a friend! Come one, come all!
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC) · UnsubscribeReply

You're invited! - Wiki Loves Monuments - San Francisco Events edit

 
Palace of Fine Arts in San Francisco

Hi! As part of Wiki Loves Monuments, we're organizing two photo events in the San Francisco Bay Area and one in Yosemite National Park. We hope you can come out and participate! Feel free to contact User:Almonroth with questions or concerns.

There are three events planned:

We look forward to seeing you there!

You are receiving this message because you signed up on the SF Bay Area event listing, or have attended an event in the Bay Area. To remove yourself, please go here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative edit

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi FlyingToaster! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Ada Lovelace Day San Francisco edit

October 16 - Ada Lovelace Day Celebration - You are invited!
Come celebrate Ada Lovelace Day at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco on October 16! This event, hosted by the Ada Initiative, the Mozilla Foundation, and the Wikimedia Foundation. It'll be a meet up style event, though you are welcome to bring a laptop and edit about women in STEM if you wish. Come mix, mingle and celebrate the legacy of the world's first computer programmer.

The event is October 16, 5:00 pm - 8:00 pm, everyone is welcome!

You must RSVP here - see you there!
SarahStierch (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit-a-thon tomorrow (Saturday) in Oakland edit

Hi, I hope you will be joining us tomorrow afternoon at the Edit-a-thon at Tech Liminal, in Oakland. We'll be working on articles relating to women and democracy (and anything else that interests you). It's sponsored by the California League of Women Voters, Tech Liminal, and me.

If this is the first you are hearing of this event, my apologies for the last-minute notice! I announced it on the San Francisco email list and by a banner on your watchlist, but I neglected to look at the San Francisco invitation list until this evening. If you can't make it this time, I hope to see you at a similar event soon! -Pete (talk) 04:44, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)! edit

WikiWomen - We need you!
Hi FlyingToaster! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wiknic 2013 edit

Wiknic 2013
Sunday, June 23rd · 12:34pm · Lake Merritt, Oakland
Theme: Hyperlocal list-making
 
Lake Merritt Wild Duck Refuge (Oakland, CA)

This year's 2013 SF Wiknik will be held at Lake Merritt, next to Children's Fairyland in Oakland. This event will be co-attended by people from the hyperlocal Oakland Wiki. May crosspollination of ideas and merriment abound!

Location and Directions edit

  • Location: The grassy area due south of Children's Fairyland (here) (Oakland Wiki)
    • Nearest BART: 19th Street
    • Nearest bus lines: NL/12/72
    • Street parking abounds
EdwardsBot (talk) 04:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Lieutenant-General Radu Baldescu.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lieutenant-General Radu Baldescu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ion Boiţeanu edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ion Boiţeanu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NickGibson3900 Talk 05:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Next meetups in North England edit

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:

If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page!

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to the notification list (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!)

Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Womanless wedding edit

 

The article Womanless wedding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance, WP:GNG. Does not constitute a speedy deletion. Please add references to prove importance and notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Anarchyte 04:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Appearance edit

Seeing your name appear on my watchlist again after such an incredibly long time was a pleasant surprise. Welcome back, FlyingToaster. :) Acalamari 18:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Molly shattuck edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Molly shattuck. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Molly_Shattuck. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Molly_Shattuck – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Samuel Tarling (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge edit

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge edit

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply