What do you want us to change in the article to keep it?

Well I did not write the article but I was actually going to encylopedize it. I think for now you can delete it until I get time to write a more balanced article that I myself write. The last person just copied and pasted a mission statement which was not appropriate.02:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Loic Lacasse

edit

I've overturned the speedy tag. However, I'm giving you 7 days from this post to come up to get some sources which prove the notablility of this person. Good luck. --wL<speak·check> 09:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Catherine Bell Super Bowl Prediction

edit

Hi! I'm leaving this note on your talk page because you listed yourself on the WikiProject American Football as someone interested in the NFL. Snopes.com [1] reported on the urban legend that Catherine Bell correctly predicted the outcome of Super Bowl XXXVI before the beginning of the season. In fact, she predicted the outcome after the teams for the Super Bowl had been determined. [2] Today, my correction got reverted, and the legend got inserted on the Super Bowl 36 page. I'm not much of a sports fan, but I do have the pages watched. I was hoping I could convince some football fans to watch the Catherine Bell and Super Bowl 36 pages. Are you up for it? Enuja 01:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

List pages

edit

Yeah, there are lots of list pages on Wikipedia. Nothing wrong with another. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EragonFragonGragon (talkcontribs) 03:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC). I reread it. There is nothing inappropriate. No porn, no violence, no discrimination.Reply

User:Mcmullenpaul

edit

What is your problem with this username? It appears to be his real life name.--Anthony.bradbury 00:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Point taken. i will watch him.--Anthony.bradbury 14:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

User:Mcmullenpaul

edit

OK, fair comment, and I will watch him. But as of now I do not see anything that I could reasonably call vandalism. I rather feel that it's just a vanity situation: I accept that I could be wrong. As I say, I will watch.--Anthony.bradbury 01:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why did you revert?

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CoHun&oldid=121283512 is not vandalism MichaelJE2 22:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism report

edit

We can't really block editors who only have one edit, maybe you could keep an eye on them? TimVickers 01:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for reverting my edit to Mudkip [3]. You beat me to the revert. I am experimenting with WikiMonitor [4] and I think that the bugs are still being worked out. That kind of a mix-up wouldn't happen with VP, I think. BTW - what happened to your user page? Do you need any help fixing it? Anyway, thanks again! κaτaʟavenoTC 00:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

April 2007

edit
 

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit that was reverted is here. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, you reverted yourself, I'm sorry for the intrusion here. Please at least be more careful with which edits you revert to using TW.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

I was about to undo that extra edit that I missed, but you got it before I did. Thank you. Bobo. 02:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope

edit

Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 00:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're invited!

edit

Wikipedia:NYG invite


WP:CVU status

edit

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
  The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your great work reverting vandalism, I hereby give you this RickK Barnstar. ChetblongT C 02:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Baseball Newsletter

edit

--  jj137 (talk) 03:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter

edit

--  jj137 (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Knicks task force

edit
Please accept this invitation to join the Knicks Task Force of the WikiProject National Basketball Association.
It is dedicated to improving all articles associated with the New York Knicks. Simply click here to accept!

NYCRuss 20:18, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quixotic plea

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 05:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, EscapingLife. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, EscapingLife. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply