User talk:EggRoll97/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Syed is part of name

Hi there, as your recent edit on Syed Jawad Naqvi, you removed the surname “Syed” ... Syed is name not title... if you want to remove syed from the name then remove “syed” from all article for example Syed Sajid Ali Naqvi, Syed Ali raza rizvi , Syed Aqeel-ul-Gharavi, Syed Sibit Hassan Naqvi and all which contain syed surname.... So kindly moving the page , first discuss on talk page...thank you DrMosaviSyed (talk) 05:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Please see WP:CONSENSUS, and discuss the name prior to moving again, to establish consensus on what name the page should reside at. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 20:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

New Section

I am Elizabeth Helgelien and I corrected information ob my wikipedia page and for some reason it keeps getting changed back to incorrect information Getitright2024 (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

@Getitright2024: If you are indeed Elizabeth Helgelien, you should not be editing on a page that you have a conflict of interest with. You can read the relevant policy at WP:COI. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

why dont you want correct and accurate factual information on Wikipedia? Getitright2024 (talk) 00:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

@Getitright2024: If the information is accurate and correct, you should be able to back up your assertations with reliable sources. Given that you have failed to do so, the changes you made to the page you claim is yours are not acceptable. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

ok where do I submit the factual information/evidence? Getitright2024 (talk) 00:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

@Getitright2024: You can include it with your edit using the {{Cite}} template, but given that you have a declared conflict of interest with the article subject (by your own claim of being the subject yourself), it may be better to file an edit request. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

ok I'll have someone else do it so its actually factual for once Getitright2024 (talk) 00:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

• News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server

• In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change

• Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!

• Obituary: Donald Cram, Peter McCawley, and Eagleash

• Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!

• Humour: Does Wikipedia present neutral perspectives?

• In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia

• Opinion: Are global bans the last step?

• Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July

• Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

• News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects

• In the media: An accusation of bias from Brazil, a lawsuit from Portugal, plagiarism from Florida

• In focus: 2023 Good Article Nomination drive is underway: get your barnstars here!

• Special report: Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still from 2005?

• Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them

• Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing

• Opinion: Copyright trolls, or the last beautiful free souls on this planet?

• Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether

• Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed

• Humour: Arbitration Committee to accept case against Right Honorable Frimbley Cantingham, 15th Viscount Bellington-upon-Porkshire

• Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

• From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online

• News and notes: You like RecentChanges?

• In the media: Taking it sleazy

• Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia

• Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties

• Humour: The Dehumourification Plan

• Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Page moves

When you moved Chorki to the base name you should have added a hatnote to the other use. I've now done that. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC) {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

International Bamboo and Rattan Organisation

Hi, please could you reconsider your close at this page? MOS:RETAIN is very clear that changes in established English variety should not be made without ties to a particular country. I disputed this move already, and this sort of thing just sows division for Jo good reason. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 07:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

@Amakuru: I've taken another look at the closure and MOS:RETAIN, stating in part, When an English variety's consistent usage has been established in an article, maintain it in the absence of consensus to the contrary. I don't see any consistent usage for "organisation", and in fact it appears the article and sourcing present in the references section utilizes "organization". In addition, the discussion had unanimous consensus to change the article titling to "organization" from "organisation" with no objections. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 01:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

I see, thank you.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

List of years in Georgia (country)

Would you be willing to consider a relist of this RM? The two late supporters suggest the discussion is continuing, and there may not really be a consensus. They also brought into the discussion a related RM that is still open. Also, one of the opposers invoked me (the nom) as a reason for their oppose, which merits clarification. Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

@Mdewman6: I'm willing to give it another run, I've reversed and relisted. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 02:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! I just think this is a case where making the distinction between whether this is truly a "not moved" or if there is really no consensus is worth the extra time for discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

• News and notes: Wikimedia power sharing – just an advisory role for the volunteer community?

• In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?

• Obituary: Nosebagbear

• Serendipity: Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no paywall, for thou, Wikipedia Library, art with me

• Featured content: Catching up

• Concept: Strange portal opened by CERN researchers brings Wikipedia articles from "other worlds"

• Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

CSD G13s

Hello, EggRoll97,

You are tagging drafts for CSD G13 speedy deletion too early. Please look at the page history. It has to be six months since the last human edit and we go by the date and time. CSD tags have been removed from drafts tagged before they expired and now they will not be eligible for G13 for another six months. Please do not tag drafts for CSD G13 speedy deletion before they are eligible to be deleted or it just postpones their deletion until March 2024. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello EggRoll97,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

• News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published

• In the media: History is written by whoever can harness the most editors

• Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"

• Featured content: By your logic,

• Concept: Wikipedia policies from other worlds: WP:NOANTLERS

• Poetry: "The Sight"

• Traffic report: There shall be no slaves in the land of lands, it's a Bollywood jam

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Query

I see you've closed a requested move for Draft:While We're Young (Jhené Aiko song) to pave a way for an article by saying that it can go through AfC approval, my apologies but I don't think that was a way to go and as a NPR I believe you checked the draft's notability and if it is suitable to be in main space or not and even if it wasn't it can be AfDd or draftified. So are you suggesting I submit the draft to AfC approval or...? dxneo (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

@Dxneo: An objection was lodged by a fellow NPR that the article did not meet WP:NSONG, seen here. The article still needs work before being included in mainspace. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 17:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

As I recall, a certified record is a criterion for notability thus can be stubbed, it states here that "a stub should contain enough information for other editors to expand upon it" of which I believe the above mentioned draft have. I have asked an admin about this matter here. I could have created the article directly in mainspace as I'm "autoreviewed" but I obviously could not, also would have expanded the page (a little) but I was held up thus I stubbed it, Robertsky, your thoughts on this? dxneo (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Coming back to it again, not opposed to moving (though I still have lingering doubts), but would like to hear Robertsky's opinion prior to doing so unilaterally. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I was taking a stricter interpretation of the various NSONG criteria, i.e. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts. (Note again that this indicates only that a song may be notable, not that it is notable.), with emphasis on the may be part. My take is that for the stub to stand, there is at least one other non-database source. Nonetheless, if there are other who thinks it can pass in its current form, sure go ahead and move it. – robertsky (talk) 05:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello robertsky and EggRoll97, I believe now the draft meets the minimum requirements listed under WP:NSONG, I was wondering if you could please move it and also make way for Draft:Sativa to Sativa (Jhené Aiko song) while you're at it. Thank you. dxneo (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

@Dxneo: @Robertsky: Moved both to mainspace. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 14:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @Dxneo. I have also given my green ticks, and done some slight clean ups. The chart tables seem funky, and I can't figure what's wrong with the table when comparing to the documentation of {{single chart}}. – robertsky (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Robertsky, thanks, I just noticed that when I added the cover art, I also don't see the problem with the template and parameters 'cause when I turn to visual editor it looks fine but it still doesn't stick. dxneo (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sales Agent, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have been told twice that the page does not contain any copyvio due to the external site being a wikipedia mirror, the external site literally says at the bottom :Source for Article: Wikipedia" PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 00:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

@PaulGamerBoy360: Please read the copyvio template. You are not to remove the template, as you are not an administrator. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

The copy patrol has already been reviewed as "no action needed" due to the external site being a wikipedia mirror", and the copyvio template you have put was done against policy due to there not ever being a copyvio. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 00:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

The copy patrol was reviewed by you, which is problematic given that you clearly have a conflict of interest as the article's creator. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 01:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

except for the fact that i actually reviewed both pages and followed policy, when marking it as no action needed because policy states that if the "copyvio" is for a wikipedia mirror it does not qualify as a copyvio, and the page literally says that the article is from wikipedia. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 01:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:EggRoll97 reported by User:PaulGamerBoy360 (Result: ). Thank you. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 00:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

• News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?

• In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing

• Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements

• Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!

• Traffic report: The calm and the storm

• News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes

• Humour: New citation template introduced for divine revelations, drug use, and really thinking about it

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello EggRoll97:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given to EggRoll97 for collecting more than 25 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Re-reviews award

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		This award is given to EggRoll97 for doing over 25 re-reviews, in the October 2023 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Pinning false positives sections

I don't think you need to mark the private hits as pinned - the page is patrolled frequently and the bot shouldn't be archiving the sections that are unresolved and have only been open a short period. It just adds a bit of extra (human) processing to see that the note is just saying that the section needs to be addressed, rather than about the filter it itself. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

@DannyS712: Apologies. I started pinning when a few reports got moved to archives without any response. I noticed them when I was working on other reports around them, but didn't notice they hadn't been responded to until they'd been moved off the report page already. One example of what I'm talking about is this. Happy to stop pinning if they're getting responses now though. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, I'll go tell the bot to hold off on unresolved threads for 3 days instead of 2 DannyS712 (talk) 04:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Done, Special:Diff/1183257869 DannyS712 (talk) 04:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

• Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015

• In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man

• News and notes: Board candidacy process posted, editors protest WMF privacy measure, sweet meetups

• Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk

• WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023

• News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia

• Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades

• Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.

• Wikidata: Evaluating qualitative systemic bias in large article sets on Wikipedia

• Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		The Rescue Barnstar is awarded to editors who rescue articles from deletion. From the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron. This barnstar is awarded to EggRoll97. Thank you for working so hard on drafts! God bless you and yours this season! Ikipedia2 (talk) 22:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

hello sir. Ikipedia2 (talk) 22:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 05:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Please check your email, I have sent you something regarding a matter about my behavior at EFFPR. – 64andtim ^(talk) 05:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

@64andtim: Understandable, and I would probably be supportive at that time if you mitigated all the issues raised. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 05:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 03:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 03:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Replied. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

• Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?

• News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023

• In the media: Consider the humble fork

• Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI

• In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU

• Technology report: Dark mode is coming

• Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata

• Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols

• Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture

• Crossword: when the crossword is sus

• Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!

• From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^

• Apocrypha: Local editor discovered 1,380 lost subheadings in ancient Signpost scrolls. And what he found was shocking.

• Humour: Guess the joke contest

• BJAODN: Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Medici move

I am asking about your move of Cosimo III de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany. Five people objected, some strongly. Four supported, one semi-supported. That seems pretty contested. How would you call that "consensus to move"? The instructions for RM closing are to default to the stable page when no consensus is reached. This page has been stable for 15 years. Where did you find consensus? Walrasiad (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Walrasiad: I would remind you that discussions are not a vote, and policy and guidelines generally are given more weight in such discussions. While your argument in opposition to the move, as well as others, was based primarily upon WP:NCPEER, other editors were able to make relevant references to the article titling policy as a whole, WP:SOVEREIGN, and specifically also referenced the more common name for the article subjects. While numerically the discussion was a closer call than some, the arguments of the supporters were more grounded in policy than arguments in opposition to the move. In addition, valid arguments against the applicability of WP:NCPEER were also raised, specifically that it is explicitly about British peers, not sovereign grand dukes. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply.

They were mistating the criteria misleadingly. There's nothing "exceptional" about British peers. The criteria in WP:NCPEER explicitly refers to European peers: "Treat other European nobility like British nobility above, adapting for local circumstances; thus Philippe II, Duke of Orléans.". So I don't see why you consider the assertion that it only applies to British dukes and not Italian dukes to be valid. (And BTW, these are not sovereigns - they are fiefdoms and vassals of the Holy Roman Empire, vested with imperial vicariate decrees, and owing tribute and troop contributions to the Emperor down until 1806. e.g.).

I don't want to re-argue the details here. But if the criteria is questionable or ambivalent, that doesn't seem to be sufficient for deducing "consensus". It was contested, and vigorously so. Even if you don't think there's consensus against the move, clearly there was not a consensus for it. If you found it narrower than usual, as you admit, default should have been to retain the page as is. Walrasiad (talk) 05:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@Walrasiad: Thank you for the response. I didn't mean to imply that the discussion itself was an overall close call. My meaning was that while I did find that there was consensus to move the pages, strictly counting the !votes would be a close call. However, that doesn't imply a consensus not to move the pages. I of course respect that there were some who were quite passionate in their opposition, but ultimately there were stronger arguments in support of the move. If you found my closure out of process, I encourage you to take it to move review, but I respectfully stand by my closure of the discussion, and my assessment of consensus. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 08:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

You say you didn't find a "consensus not to move". But that's not the criteria. If there is "no consensus", then the page should remain at its most stable title. I am asking where you found a "consensus to move" rather than "no consensus". Walrasiad (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

@Walrasiad: I did not say I "didn't find a consensus not to move". I said I found a consensus to move, based on policy arguments already laid out in the discussion. Once again, if you still believe my closure was out of process, I encourage move review. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 20:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought I had done all the steps, but evidently I forgot the last two. Walrasiad (talk)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

• From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!

• Special report: Public Domain Day 2024

• Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit

• News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!

• In focus: The long road of a featured article candidate

• In the media: What is plagiarism? Oklahoma Disneyland? Reaching a human being at Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine

• Obituary: Anthony Bradbury

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023

• Crossword: everybody gangsta till the style sheets start cascading

• Comix: Conflict resolution

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Conduct Case 2024-1: Mzajac opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Administrator Conduct Case 2024-1: Mzajac. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Administrator Conduct Case 2024-1: Mzajac/Evidence. Please add your evidence by January 30, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Administrator Conduct Case 2024-1: Mzajac/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Arin Hanson edit filter hit

The filter was working properly. Please don't re-add that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

• News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail

• Opinion: Until it happens to you

• Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry

• In the media: Katherine Maher new NPR CEO, go check Wikipedia, race in the race

• In focus: The long road of a featured article candidate, part 2

• Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"

• Comix: We've all got to start somewhere

• Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers

• Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?

• Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to touch grass to dramatically improve images of flora and fauna

• In the media: Speaking in tongues, toeing the line, and dressing the part

• Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?

• Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football

• Crossword: Our crossword to bear

• Comix: Strongly

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 23:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Seawolf35: Responded. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 22:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"

• Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"

• In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record

• Obituary: Vami_IV

• Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday

• WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Account creator granted

After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the Saguenay mess

My apologies. Looks like it was a fair bit of work. I think I've got it straightened out now, after doing some research in the 1850 statutes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Sir why you protect Siyal(caste) page this page totally wrong theory.

This source was proved siyal and chamar different caste. (1) Singh, K.S.: People of India: Odisha (2 pts), 1992, by the Anthropological Survey of India (2) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI), Odisha (3) Orissa (India). Tribal Research Bureau: Adibasi, 1969 (4) The Scheduled Caste Population in Odisha book (5) Alte, I.D.: Rural Employment of Scheduled Castes, 1992 (6) Mishra, P.K.: Harijans in Hindu and Tribal Social Structures, 1992 (7) Hunter, W.: *Orissa: Vol. II (in French)*, 2023 Das, N.K.: Odisha, 2012 (8) Pati, R.N.: Family Planning, 2008 Ramachbehera1 (talk) 04:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

@Ramachbehera1: I didn't protect the page, only administrators can do that. The page was protected in accordance with general sanctions authorized by the wider community, and any uninvolved administrator is able to enforce page protection, among a list of other page- and user-related sanctions, in accordance with WP:CASTE, enforced on the Siyal page as extended confirmed protection, meaning you will need a tenure of 30 days and at least 500 constructive edits to the encyclopedia in order to edit that page, seen here. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 20:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Sir please help me how to edit this article? Ramachbehera1 (talk) 08:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @Ramachbehera1: You are not allowed. Clearly, you should not be editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

• Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year

• Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy

• Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles

• Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge

• Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors

• News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified

• In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled

• Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune

• Humour: Letters from the editors

• Comix: Layout issue

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Question about abuse of edit filters

I plan to be an edit filter helper next year on February or March of 2025, intending to assist with authoring filters using my basic knowledge of filter syntax. There is one question for me whose answer I might need to know: what is abuse of edit filters that's listed on WP:EFH?

If this might be a private matter, feel free to email me or simply respond here. Thank you. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 16:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

@Codename Noreste: Replied via email per WP:BEANS. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 01:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello EggRoll97,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 23:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Responded. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 02:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

EFM

I have closed your request at EFN as successful, congratulations! Please remember to use a strong password, consider enabling 2FA, etc. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I already have both of these implemented! EggRoll97 ^(talk) 23:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-15

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Web browsers can use tools called extensions. There is now a Chrome extension called Citation Needed which you can use to see if an online statement is supported by a Wikipedia article. This is a small experiment to see if Wikipedia can be used this way. Because it is a small experiment, it can only be used in Chrome in English.
• A new Edit Recovery feature has been added to all wikis, available as a user preference. Once you enable it, your in-progress edits will be stored in your web browser, and if you accidentally close an editing window or your browser or computer crashes, you will be prompted to recover the unpublished text. Please leave any feedback on the project talk page. This was the #8 wish in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey.
• Initial results of Edit check experiments have been published. Edit Check is now deployed as a default feature at the wikis that tested it. Let us know if you want your wiki to be part of the next deployment of Edit check. [1][2]
• Readers using the Minerva skin on mobile will notice there has been an improvement in the line height across all typography settings. [3]

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 April. It will be on all wikis from 11 April (calendar). [4][5]
• New accounts and logged-out users will get the visual editor as their default editor on mobile. This deployment is made at all wikis except for the English Wikipedia. [6]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

On IP 62.31.29.48 talk page

Hello, I'm The Master of Hedgehogs. I noticed you reverted my edit, citing WP:BITE and WP:AGF. I use RedWarn, and if you go to warn a user with RedWarn, it states that level one warnings, like the one I applied, assume good faith. I wasn't intending on BITEing the IP, and they had received a welcome message from another user a long time ago. If you have any concerns, reach out to me on my talk page. The Master of Hedgehogs ^{(converse) (hedgehogs)} 18:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to see my response on your talk page. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 18:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I've sent an update about that proposed private filter accompanied with a message. Codename Noreste 🤔 𝙇𝙖 𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖 23:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

@Codename Noreste: That update needs to be sent to the mailing list, please. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-16

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

• Between 2 April and 8 April, on wikis using Flagged Revisions, the "Reverted" tag was not applied to undone edits. In addition, page moves, protections and imports were not autoreviewed. This problem is now fixed. [7][8]

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 April. It will be on all wikis from 18 April (calendar). [9][10]
• Default category sort keys will now affect categories added by templates placed in footnotes. Previously footnotes used the page title as the default sort key even if a different default sort key was specified (category-specific sort keys already worked). [11]
• A new variable page_last_edit_age will be added to abuse filters. It tells how many seconds ago the last edit to a page was made. [12]

Future changes

• Volunteer developers are kindly asked to update the code of their tools and features to handle temporary accounts. Learn more.
• Four database fields will be removed from database replicas (including Quarry). This affects only the abuse_filter and abuse_filter_history tables. Some queries might need to be updated. [13]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)