Welcome!

edit

Hello, Edith Violet Naisubi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Edith Violet Naisubi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayat (Rapper)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Ayat (Rapper), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster talk 17:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Ayat (Rapper), you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Andrew Felix Kaweesi. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Spice Diana

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spice Diana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bythebooklibrary (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ayorkor Korsah for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayorkor Korsah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayorkor Korsah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Spice Diana for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spice Diana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spice Diana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PabloMartinez (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kizza Besigye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aga Khan Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Nataliey Bitature

edit

Hello, Edith Violet Naisubi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nataliey Bitature should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nataliey Bitature .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 TT me 17:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Hi, thanks for message. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft.

You may have missed my deletion comment G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: Refs are not independent third-party sources, see WP:NOTOBIT

You may have missed the article talk page comment from DanielRigal, who said

It is promotional because its glowing tone is obviously intended to promote the reputation of the article's subject. It also falls foul of the WP:NOTOBIT policy. If the article were to be rewritten from scratch in a much more neutral tone then it is still very unlikely that it could succeed. At present I see nothing indicating that the subject meets the criteria in WP:PROF or WP:GNG.
I do not think that the article as currently written can be repaired for use on Wikipedia. You can copy it to another website if they will accept it. If you want to make a memorial then that is the best thing for you to do and this is what I recommend.
I doubt that there is any way that the subject can be suitable for a Wikipedia article so I do not advise starting on a new draft article. If you read the policies then you will see what is required for a person to be notable enough for an article. If you read them carefully and still think that the subject can have an article then you can try making a short draft article focusing on proving that the requirements are met. Please understand that I think this is very unlikely to succeed so please think carefully before you risk wasting a lot of time on it.

I deleted your article because

  • it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the subject, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the subject claims or interviewing them. You gave some references, but they were not independent third-party sources. They included her own CV, her university profile, articles quoting her, and an obituary, which by its nature is likely to be an uncritical eulogy. Much of the text was completely unsourced
  • it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
  • Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: won the International Federation on Ageing (IFA) Presidential award isn't supported by the reference you gave, nor is Nana Araba has written over 70 articles
  • You decided that she would be the only person on wikipedia to have their surname fully capitalised

Although you claimed on the article talk page that you were familiar with Wikipedia guidelines, all the deletion discussions and warnings above this message suggest otherwise. Before attempting to write this or any other article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

It's not the worse I've seen, and if you want to try again, I'll post the deleted text to a draft page for you to work on, just let me know if you wish to proceed and make any COI declaration Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:55, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Article moved to draft

edit

Hello, I recently moved an article you created to Draft:Sexual exploitation of Ugandan refugees, where you can improve the article without obstruction. I have done this as the article did not appear to be complete and was tagged with a creation template.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jano Band, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Afar and Coke Studio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebecca Awuah

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rebecca Awuah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Flixtey (talk) 00:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Edith Violet Naisubi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stephen Adei

edit
 

The article Stephen Adei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No working references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Your addition to Stephen Adei has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. →Enock4seth (talk) 15:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andrew Felix Kaweesi

edit
 

The article Andrew Felix Kaweesi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sources related to death.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Splinemath (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge

edit

Hi, your work would be warmly welcome on the challenge page. Always promising to see active editors from countries like Uganda on here!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dr. Blofeld, I will be glad to be part, thanks for the invite.--Edith Violet Naisubi (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week

edit

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to the top half of Africa, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Edith Violet Naisubi

Thank you for creating Fresh Kid Uganda.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ashesi Wiki Club has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Ashesi Wiki Club has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply