Dzida888

May 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zlatko Lagumdžija‎, you may be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 17:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:International School of Sarajevo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International School of Sarajevo. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:International School of Sarajevo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International School of Sarajevo. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: International School of Sarajevo (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International School of Sarajevo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 18:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Dzida888, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 18:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:International School of Sarajevo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:International School of Sarajevo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:International School of Sarajevo

Hello, Dzida888. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International School of Sarajevo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AIESEC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Izet Nanić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Golden Lily (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milorad Dodik‎, you may be blocked from editing privileges. --Obsuser (talk) 19:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Midhat Hujdur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Midhat Hujdur, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Greetings, thank You for this message. Dzida888 (talk) 11:51, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Midhat Hujdur

Hello, Dzida888. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Midhat Hujdur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Mate Rimac, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mate Rimac. Jeppiz (talk) 18:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is about sources, not personal guesses. You are not allowed to insert your own guesses or interpretations. To make it perfectly clear: between sources and the "truth", Wikipedia goes with the sources, not the truth. Jeppiz (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Greetings Jeppiz, with all respect, haven't You read what I have put in the edit summary? Namely, Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian language are mutually intelligible; as I'm a Bosnian myself, I can definitely confirm You that I fully understand Croatian and that difference between Bosnian and Croatian is like that of English spoken in the United States and English which is spoken in the United Kingdom. Please, the article looks bad because it doesn't make sense to say that if somebody is a Bosnian speaker that they don't speak Croatian well. NO, they speak it, but with a Bosnian accent. The only difference between the two languages is the accent, all of the words and the grammar are the same, so please, don't erase my edits at once, and please, at least read this message. To end this, I did not put my personal guesses as You have quoted into this article, but a referenced article as it is supposed to be. 18:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I've read your arguments. The problem is that you don't seem to understand we are not allowed to put in our own ideas. It's called original research and is forbidden, please read WP:OR. Again: if you or I are 100% right and the sources 100% wrong, we'd still go with the sources. That's how Wikipedia works. Jeppiz (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Greetings Jeppiz, ok, that's understandable, however, the current reference used in the case of Mate Rimac's childhood is in fact an article which is not even available to the public (as it requires that it must be paid in order to be opened) whilst I'm offering You two articles, both of them being open to the public and one of them being a professional article explaining the distribution and the types of the accents of the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian language.

I apologize if the previous message was a little assertive on my side, but I'm just implying that You should read it and have it properly replaced, Wikipedia is after all meant to provide true facts.

Yours,

Dzida888

Hello again. So,that is exactly what original research means. You have taken an article that says (correctly) Kajkavian and Shtotakvian are different, but then you offer your theory that that is why Rimac was bullied. That is exactly what we cannot do. An article about differences between Shtokavian and Kajkavian can be used for our articles on Kajkavian and Shtokavian - but absolutely not for an article on Rimac. Jeppiz (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Dear Jeppiz, thank You, this has definitely given a thorough perspective on how Wikipedia works. I'm just going to allude that it doesn't make sense to say that someone speaks Bosnian but that they don't speak Croatian well. Secondly, we cannot open an article of the reference that was used by a previous editor, this is a Schrodinger's cat; how can we know what was written in the article that was used for the reference if that same article is locked? 19:20 7 July 2021 (UCT)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Citing Sources Guide

Hey Dzida888, I just wanted to help you out with citations since my explanation was too short. You can go to the Wikipedia:Citing sources page and then go to the section called "Inline Citations" (section 4). I would highly recommend reading that part of the Wikipedia guide for a better understanding of how to cite certain sources. I would also like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, they are highly appreciated! Xpërt3 (talk) 09:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Dear Xpert3,

salaam alaykum, thank You for conveying this knowledge to me. God willing, let's hope that will be of good use in the future. I am genuinely happy to see that there are still people out there who contribute to the heritage of King Faisal (r.a.a.). Ramadan kereem. Dzida888 (talk) 23:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

What's the significance of your edit: The date corresponded exactly with the date of birth of Prophet Muhammad per the Hijri calendar. The statement you inserted is not encyclopedic. Egeymi (talk) 16:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

And be honest, the source you linked (which I myself added in 2015) was published in 1952 as you may see below. Therefore, this book does not and cannot include any statement like the one that you have been trying to add. So do not act like that. Everybody is smart as much as you.

George Kheirallah (1952). Arabia Reborn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. p. 254. ISBN 978-1-258-50201-0. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019.

Hi Egyemi,

So, what seems to be the issue again? It just happened that the Day when King Faisal (R.A) was assissinated was the Mawlid, which is an important occassion in the Islamic world and knowing it can be deemed as useful knowledge. If You don't like that piece of information, that's also OK, but there's no need that You erase the aforementioned.

Cheers Dzida888 (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Secondly,

With all due to respect, aren't we supposed to say Hello at the start of the conversation. Dzida888 (talk) 18:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Thirdly,

You should, afterall, look at the whole image. You should bear in mind that King Faisal was assinated on the Day which corresponded with the birth of Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) per the *Hijri* calendar, not the western calendar. Henceforth, You shouldn't refer to that editt as being false information. The Day of the Birth of Prophet Muhammad (SAWS) often known as "Mawlid" is on different Day each year per the Hijri (also known as the Lunar calendar), whilst it is True that it didn't correspond with the Western calendar.

Dzida888 (talk) 18:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Correction* on the different Day each year per the *western* calendar Dzida888 (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Hope you will not try again to use false sources from now on. And please use full references instead of putting bare url which is not recommended. It would be useful if you will expand the references following day/month/year format set for the page. Egeymi (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

As someone warned you above, it is again a personal research and none of the bare url references you put do not state that the King was killed on the day the Prophet was born. Because of this it should be reverted. Egeymi (talk) 19:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Egyemi,

True, perhaps not directly, but it is pretty obvious though. Dzida888 (talk) 19:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Senad hadzic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Senad hadzic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 747pilot (talk) 00:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Senad Hadzic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Senad Hadzic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senad Hadzic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Umar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)