May 2015

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

Reference errors on 8 May

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Howdy!

Been a long time since I've bumped into you around the water cooler. Hope you're doing well.

If you have a moment, I could use an uninvolved admin having a look at the recent history of 97.9 FM. Stupid little situation from which I'm disengaging before it becomes a thing. Mlaffs (talk) 02:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm well, thanks. A disambiguation page is no place for that sort of extraneous description nor are the blog post and radio station website sufficient justification for same. The description belongs in the linked article and, since it didn't exist, I have created it. If the editor in question persists, point them at WXTF-LP then remind them that Wordpress sites from involved people are not reliable sources and that text about somewhat-related defunct internet radio stations is likely not relevant to the licensed LPFM. (Hope this helps.) - Dravecky (talk) 05:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Follow-up: Okay, the original was not a defunct internet radio station but a defunct pirate radio station. WTF, indeed. I found this article from 2010 with a few juicy bits, if you're interested. - Dravecky (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

PreerP

Hi! I wondered, did you read my comment at Talk:PreerP‎? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but speedy is only for blatant hoaxes and this case was not immediately conclusive. I'd suggest a {{prod}} tag instead. - Dravecky (talk) 23:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
OK, just wanted to be sure, as it seems pretty blatant to me. I tend not to use prod as "PROD must only be used if no opposition is to be expected", and you can almost always expect the article creator to object, as indeed I would in this case. AfD it is. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KJIK logo.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:KJIK logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)