Your submission at Articles for creation: Darq (October 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, DasherPlayer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Nomadicghumakkad! I have improved all the errors you can review it again DasherPlayer (talk) 10:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darq (November 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zxcvbnm were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darq (November 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 07:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks AngusW🐶🐶F for your review. I have improved my errors and mistakes so you can review it again. DasherPlayer (talk) 10:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darq (December 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Darq edit

  Hello, DasherPlayer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Darq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Darq edit

 

Hello, DasherPlayer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Darq".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

You can't grab images from IMDB and claim them as your own work edit

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023 edit

  Your edit to Iman Vellani has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ... discospinster talk 15:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

but it had only some rights reserved. If it was a case where the licensed property had all rights reserved, the permission is explicitly needed. DasherPlayer (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is also from Flickr...btw DasherPlayer (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
That image is from The Guardian. The person who put it on Flickr did not have the rights to do so. ... discospinster talk 20:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
So... what should I do then. Credit Guardian instead DasherPlayer (talk) 08:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Guys please review my Jorge Motos wiki edit

it is there for so long! DasherPlayer (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Motos has been accepted edit

 
Jorge Motos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2024 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mammootty, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Have a look at words to watch for further details. Thanks and happy editing :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I can argue otherwise, I am not a fan of his works, but I did see most of his filmography. It is diverse, nuanced and grounded enough to be called thespian. I hope you get what I mean here. DasherPlayer (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply