Danrolo

Recent edit to Dominique Gallego

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dominique Gallego, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Danrolo,

welcome back! The rules however don't have changed and you know them already. No substantial changes without references. Please respect this. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 18:26, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Danrolo, please! You have to stop this. I believe that you try to help Wikipedia and to spread accurate information. Some of your edits are indeed helpful and I thank you for them. But you have to accept Wikipedia's fundamental rule of WP:verifiability. Please cite your sources. Otherwise your edits are counterproductive. We cannot use them, unless you provide appropriate references. If you continue to revert again and again (WP:Edit warring!), you know that you will be blocked again. Do you want that? I would be sorry, because many of your edits are helpful. I had hoped that you would have become more mature and try to contribute in a productive way, in accord with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I still have hope. Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

References

Hi, I urge you to please put references in the articles that you're editing. If you don't add any references, it means that you're adding fake information or you're committing vandalism, and you could be blocked. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit war

Your recent editing history at National Renewal (Chile) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --RJFF (talk) 11:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2006 Chilean telethon

added a link pointing to Watts

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Border

Hi. The border in the case of National Union Movement is unnecesary, as the background is grey and only a portion of the flag is white, the borders are with colors blue and red, and therefore it's not neccesary to clarify the borders of the flag when it's already clear. --Sfs90 (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the National Advancement page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Translation

The correct translation is "Democratic". Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Independent Democratic Union, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Danrolo reported by User:Diego Grez-Cañete (Result: ). Thank you. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 23:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm ♠ 05:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Humanist Green Alliance page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Liberal Party (Chile, 1988) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring again

Your recent editing history at National Renewal (Chile) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --RJFF (talk) 22:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Chilean telethon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Jara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Venezuelan elections

Thanks for adding the extra election years to {{Venezuelan elections}}. Do you have a source that has the results for them? Cheers, Number 57 10:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Eurocommunism

Hi. In regards to some recent edits, I'd suggest not adding Eurocommunism for European CPs in general. The term is outdated today and parties like PCP and KKE vehemtly opposed it at the time. See for example: "In Portugal, where the party (PCP) opposes Eurocommunism, it continues to play an important role." (https://books.google.com/books?id=Bq3mAAAAMAAJ&q=pcp+eurocommunism) --Soman (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Unreferenced edits

Stop making edits without sources or references. It's not the the first time that editors warn you; if you continue with this attitude, you will be denounced. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm warning you one more time: stop reverting edits -like the ones you did on Graciela Alfano- because you don't have any reference that support your edits. Stop publishing non-referenced info. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

National Independence Federation

Where is your source for the foundation/disestablished dates? Number 57 21:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Novo Doba

A tag has been placed on Novo Doba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No sources given, no notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sfs90 (talk) 04:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valdivias Deutsche Zeitung

The article Valdivias Deutsche Zeitung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources given, no notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sfs90 (talk) 22:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Don't remove tags

I urge you to stop removing deletion templates on the articles Valdivias Deutsche Zeitung and Domovina (newspaper). If you remove that templates again you'll be reported and blocked for disruptive editing. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 06:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Domovina (newspaper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Domovina (newspaper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domovina (newspaper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 17:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of La Reforma Al-Islah

A tag has been placed on La Reforma Al-Islah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No sources, no notability given

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sfs90 (talk) 23:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Danrolo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2016 Chilean telethon page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help) and a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Chilean telethon

Hello, as i've seen that you created the article 2016 Chilean telethon, maybe you're interesed in create articles from previous telethon that aren't in english Wikipedia.

• 2012 Chilean telethon (es)
• 2014 Chilean telethon (es)

Thanks for translating! -- Janitoalevic (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Syrian Republic (1930–63) move

Please see this. Best, Yazan (talk) 09:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Graciela Alfano

Please don't post again information without their respective references. Do you have any source that states clearly that Graciela Alfano was on The Tonight Show or Saturday Night Live? The next time you add information without sources or cite I will report you and will be blocked. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Yazan (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yair Nossovsky, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kika Silva

Hello, Danrolo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kika Silva, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Kika Silva to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Indefinite block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Due to total failure to communicate with other editors, and this already being a sock of an indefinitely blocked Danrolo~enwiki. El_C 15:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radio Agricultura

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Radio Agricultura requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf^(talk) 11:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aryane Steinkopf

Hello, Danrolo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Aryane Steinkopf, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 --- Α Guy Into Books™ § (Message) -  07:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

2010 Chilean telethon

The 'Sponsors' section of this article was added by you in October 2015. It needs to be translated: items intended for readers on the English WP should be in English, or there is no value in having them here. Please translate this into English, or it will need to be deleted. Moonraker12 (talk) 16:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)