Welcome!

edit
Hello, Cranky Savage! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffery Sekele, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Woolworth and ABSA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Idoghor Melody. An edit that you recently made to John Aruakpor seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

ok @Idoghor Melody there's no problem of fixing the mistakes I made, I mean I'm also a human that makes mistakes like everyone else. Anyway thank you for your contribution.Cranky Savage (talk) 08:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Lil Waggy. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Dark-World25 (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Waggy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

ANI Notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have seen it and @Idoghor Melody Check it back. Cranky Savage (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Cranky Savage: Hey, I've seen your explanation. Waiting for an admin to revdel the revision where my information was on your userpage. I'm not against the copying, because there are stuffs I copied from others too, but be sure to modify them properly before pasting. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 09:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
thanks! I will do so. `have a great day'@Idoghor Melody Cranky Savage (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kealeboga Masango (May 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Cranky Savage! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kealeboga Masango (May 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 04:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Waggy

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Waggy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dark-World25 (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Waggy

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Waggy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cranky Savage (talk) 16:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Waggy

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Waggy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lois du Plessis

edit
 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cranky Savage (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lois du Plessis moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Lois du Plessis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lil Waggy for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil Waggy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Waggy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 17:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Waggy

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Waggy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lois du Plessis moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Lois du Plessis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BTW, when did you become an AFC Reviewer that you're posing like you're accepting articles? Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
please view my appeal. Cranky Savage (talk) 18:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cranky SavageRight from when you started, you have been editing unconstructivelly and you even copied content of my userpage and pasted them without editing. You have also claimed to be an AFC Reviewer in some of your recent edits and have engaged in many move war... Hmmmmmm Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cranky Savage (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am deeply sorry for editing to Wikipedia in a wrong way. I am a new Wikipedia Editor, and I've been logged in for 4 days. Contributing to Wikipedia is a long-term thing I want to do as many people rely on this site to find relevant information. I want to help expanding Wikipedia's article's and do the little I know to it. It wasn't my intention to do those edits , I was depressed by other users who interrupted my work. I would really appreciate it if I get another second chance to edit on Wikipedia, it will really mean a lot to me. Thanks Cranky Savage (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You don't discuss it here but it appears that you have some sort of connection to Lois du Plessis. I'm also concerned by your "It wasn't my intention to do those edits" statement. Personally I think any chance at an unblock here depends on you agreeing to refrain from creating articles for awhile and giving at least one example of a substantive edit(more than fixing spelling or grammar) you wish to make to an existing article. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC) yes I agree to refrain from creating articles for awhile and and I would like to give one example of a substantive edit(more than fixing spelling or grammar) you wish to make to an existing article but the problem is that I can't edit because I have been blocked, I request for an unblock so that I can provide that proof that I I will stick to that for a while.Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The combination of your username "Cranky Savage" and the statement "It wasn't my intention to do those edits" leaves me wondering if an unblock would be helpful to the encyclopedia even if you'd act completely in good faith. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • The username is just combination of words, yes, the unblock will be helpful to the encyclopedia as my aim is to expand the knowledge of this site. I want to continue making contributions to Wikipedia and It would be an honour to be unblocked so I could continue to do what I committed myself to. Please , I will never do the same mistakes I did, I've learned something from this blocking.
  • after the unblock I will stop creating new article for a while, I will only going to be fixing spellings as well as grammars as I was doing before. With just fixing this mistakes I found myself with 234 Edits in just 3 days. Please give me another chance to be part of those who contribute to this encyclopedia as I make a promise that I will avoid repeating the very same mistakes as I did Cranky Savage (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC).Reply

Lois du Plessis (Actress) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Lois du Plessis (Actress), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

whatever🙄 Cranky Savage (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cranky Savage (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

  • after the unblock I will stop creating new article for a while, I will only going to be fixing spellings as well as grammars as I was doing before. With just fixing this mistakes I found myself with 234 Edits in just 3 days. Please give me another chance to be part of those who contribute to this encyclopedia as I make a promise that I will avoid repeating the very same mistakes as I did. Cranky Savage (talk) 03:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Since previous accounts have had TPA revoked for valid cause, revoking here as well. You may appeal to the Arbitration Committee by emailing arbcom-en wikimedia.org. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You wouldn't only need to stop creating new articles, you'd also need to stop creating new accounts.[1] ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply