User talk:CAWylie/Archive 6

Deaths in December 2013

Hi Wylie, you might like to make an early start on "flipping" Deaths in December 2013 as there is no seven-day period of transition at the end of the year. Regards, WWGB (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks! Great fun too, as I'm away from my PC and did it all on this tiny cell phone screen. I also redded the year to the List page. — Wyliepedia 14:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

You couldn't have waited a couple of days until you rendered the article useless? 108.14.255.165 (talk) 14:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

If you're asking about the monthly article, the blue link above shows it's not "rendered useless". If you're asking about Deaths in 2013, we do this at the end of every year, as it's pointless to keep it for the standard seven day period, since Deaths in 2014 exists. December 2013 showed pretty much the same info as the 2013 article. Happy New Year! — Wyliepedia 15:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Patricia Boyle articles-merging

Hi-there are two articles Patricia Boyle and Patricia J. Boyle and they are about the same person Michigan Associate Justice Patricia Boyle who died recently. The articles need to be merged and I am not sure how to do it. Any help with be appreciated. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Both articles had only slight differences, so I redded to the simpler name. If another Patricia Boyle arises, then we can go from there. History-merges are not advised, if possible. Thanks! — Wyliepedia 21:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for doing this.RFD (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome! — Wyliepedia 15:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Claudio Abbado may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• – January 20, 2014)<ref>[http://www.ilpost.it/2014/01/20/live-morte-claudio-abbado/ Il Post]</ref>) was an [[Italy|Italian]] [[Conducting|conductor]]. He served as [[music director]] of the [[La

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Would you help assess Tom Clancy's Op Center (1995), please?

True, I was only able to find three sources and one of them is imdb, but the movie is a good one and unfortunately still topical (espionage ethics, lack of; politics, ditto; ME crisis; Iran). Any help would really be appreciated. Have a Good One! Cheers, Shir-El too 07:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

PS regards to Carnivoris vulgaris!

PPS: would you also help put it up for DYK? something like "... Tom Clancy's Op Center (1995) was a 170 minute TV miniseries that was edited down to a 114 minute TV movie?" Cheers!

Great job on it! Firstly, I moved it to a more proper title Tom Clancy's Op Center (film). You only need a year if there's more than one in the medium. Secondly, I assessed it as a film stub, although it could be a C-Class if more could be found to write about it, production-wise. If not, it could still pass as a C with a cleanup. Fourthly, I don't think DYK would accept the "hook" you gave, but ya never know about that bunch. I do know they require hooks to be sourced, which there isn't much in the article. Take care! Meep meep! — Wyliepedia 08:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wow! Thank you very much for the time, the commendation and the move - not to mention the pointers! (1) I'll continue digging for data anyway, but... (2) You write "...it could still pass as a C with a cleanup." What kind of cleanup, please? (3) The DYK I wanted to use was "... that Tom Clancy's Op Center is the only Tom Clancy story to be made into a TV mini-series, though it was later shortened to movie length?" but was unable to verify this. All the Best, Shir-El too 11:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

("Meep meep!" indeed. I use that and a big grin to get people blocking supermarket isles and such to move. Works every time!)

Cleanup suggestions

1. Definitely somehow source the trim part, if possible. It can't be from watching both with a stopwatch. Haha.
2. The plot is a wee bit long, but I've seen worse, and I wouldn't worry about it unless someone tags it. It's an action-spy movie: plots will be complicated.
3. The cast section is fine because of those big names, but the crew could be shorter or even put into sentence form in the production section, since only three have links and in the infobox.
4. Also be careful with the reviews, you want to avoid undue weight with those. For example, one reviewer gets only one paragraph while the other gets three. Balance them out so no one gets twisted over it.

All that said it is very well done. As for the new DYK thing, that is much better, but again, needs sourced. A DYK sticking point. — Wyliepedia 11:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

"Roger, wilco"... and thanks again. Cheers! Shir-El too 16:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome! Over and out. ~squelch~ — Wyliepedia 16:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Added a 3rd review to Op Center, and a note; would you look at it please? So far the only reference to the editing is in a customer review on Amazon - which I gather is persona non grata here - and the fact the reviews mention "4-hours" or "170 minutes" whereas outlets all stick to "114 minutes." BTW the references are driving me nuts: how do you get the web address to disappear? I went over the syntax 3 times and missed it.

On another subject: added a Locations section to Logan's Run (film); have never seen it, but 3 clips on YouTube sent me surfing PDQ. Turns out they are definitely 'notable'! Please look at it; it looks a bit bombastic to me. Oh! and how do you link to a sub-heading in an article, not just the article? I know it can be done, but don't remember how. Have a Good One! (no 'tweets' this time!) Shir-El too 14:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

To do a full cite, use the cite web template: <ref>{{cite web |url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |work= |accessdate=}}</ref>. For a simpler cite, just use: <ref>[url followed by title]</ref>. To wikilink to a page subheading, just add an # and the subheading after the article name in the link. For example, [[Logan's Run (film)#Locations]] gives you Logan's Run (film)#Locations. Piping with other words is optional. Hope that helps!

As for Locations "bombasity", I think it's simply fancruft from those movie fans or city residents. I've seen people add location images to some articles. For cult classics like Run, it's acceptable to a degree. — Wyliepedia 02:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Indeed it does help: I'm copying your instructions for future use.

Re Logan's Run: made before CGI, some scenes had to have been shot at real locations - they were too complex/expensive for sets. {I am always amazed how cinematography turns a real place into something else: like The Center in The Pretender (TV series)#Production, which turned out to be the R. C. Harris Water Treatment Plant.} Thank you again, and have a Good One! Cheers (pun intended!) Shir-El too 15:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

PS

Forgot to mention: Op Center is in YouTube! Shir-El too 12:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Shirley Temple

FYI : MOS:BIO does not say that there shouldn't be any referenced information in brackets (parenthesis) ~ it only says that places of birth and death should not be in the brackets for birth and death in the intro. The MoS principle is that information in brackets is also referenced inside the brackets. Cheers, Afterwriting (talk) 16:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I've seen bios that do it all three ways, mostly the places with date cites. Knew it was one of the two. — Wyliepedia 16:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Toni Ucci

Hello,

Catarella from WP:fr speaking. Wrt your commit comment: Also listed proper birth year, per Italian & French pages., I'd like to stress that the French version has been translated (by me) from the Italian page. The Italian birth date being without source, I would not call this information "proper" :-) although I think it looks like the correct one.

I'm monitoring all the time for sources about his death, but so far, it looks like a rumour that originated on IMDb. The information is being copied on blogs and cooperative news sites. The date of death on these sites seems very uncertain: 16, 17, or 19 February. What makes me doubt a lot is that the major sources like La Repubblica (the ones that double-check their informations) did not announce his death.

I approve the revert "to being alive" until proved by a correct source. Thanks for your concern. In the hope that this message helps, --Agatino Catarella (talk) 05:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for writing and staying on top of it. The source I put on his talkpage also listed him at the "proper" age, even if they are quick to act upon death speculations. I also removed him from Deaths in 2014 until further notice. — Wyliepedia 05:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

That's very wise, thank you. Let's stay tuned. --Agatino Catarella (talk) 05:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Reply

I genuinely have no idea what happened with the source thing, I was just adding to Casale's entry. This was not intentional and I do apologize. Rusted AutoParts 22:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for all your help.

Thanks CAWylie for your great help in editing it is valuable work.(Ladytwentytwo (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC))

I presume you are talking about The N-Factor? You're welcome. I try to check in on things I've helped in the past, especially those I've been given barnstars for. Thanks for stopping by! — Wyliepedia 19:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christpoher R. King

Hello CAWylie. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christpoher R. King, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: it isn't six months yet. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

I'll return in 3 weeks then. — Wyliepedia 11:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Retagged and noted the article name is spelled wrong. — Wyliepedia 05:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

FYI

Someone is playing around with the article titles. Both of those you mentioned tonight where changed after I put them in. I know because I checked both. It was strange to me that the article was under Hal Mowery, but there was no mention of his nickname in the Wiki article. Someone came by later and changed the page to the Christian version. Ciao. Sunnydoo (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

And someone has done the same with Pogue. There was not an "R." there earlier either. I know because Kiwi and I tried to put it in at the same time with 2 different names (I had Bill and he had the full 3...it was originally listed under Bill, but then William and now William R. Sunnydoo (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Hehe, you missed your opportunity tonight. Should have gone with "You Only Live Twice." Sunnydoo (talk) 08:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hell on Wheels

Just out of curiosity why did you undo my edit on Hell on Wheels? You didn't give a reason on your revert[1].--SportsMaster (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Because your edit added in the entire episode list. There's already a link to it within the See also. — Wyliepedia 21:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Good point. --SportsMaster (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Infobox television episode

There are some issues with proposed parameters for {{Infobox television episode}}. I've left a message at WT:TV about this but unfortunately the templates used in the TV project draw little interest, even though they often cause us grief. Because of this I'm approaching experienced editors directly, with a view to getting some more input. The discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Infobox television episode provides an introduction to the issues. Your attention would be greatly appreciated. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, my major assessment undertaking at WPTV last year proved to me that it's a veritable ghost town/project. — Wyliepedia 08:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

It's incredibly difficult to get responses for the important stuff, although people seem happy to dive into the trivialities.[2] And now an editor has added parameters to the infobox without any real discussion. He reverted my removal and without responses to the subeuent proposal, I expect he'll edit war to keep them in. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

ref question

Hi! Quick follow up to this conversation. You fixed the issue that the bot tried to fix. Thanks. Can you please explain to me what was wrong so I don't do it again or so I can fix it if I have to undo a bot again? StarM 01:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Gladly. In reverting the vandalism, you overlooked the bot's edit, although I have yet to figure how it did that from a redlinked template. Your vandalism revert was needed, but, sometimes, the well-meaning edits get lost. It happens. Have done it myself. I admit this is the first I've heard that a full reference shouldn't be in an infobox, but it's a strange Wikiworld. — Wyliepedia 02:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

thanks. It was the "full reference shouldn't be in an infobox" part that was/is confusing me, but the how to with the bot was a huge help. How did you know what to fix re: the ref. It wasn't so much that I overlooked it as I didn't know how to fix the broken template without undoing bot too. Thanks again. StarM 03:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

"How did you know what to fix?" Trial and error, from two years of editing. In this instance, I just took the pre-vandalism version and added the bot's fix. Thanks for stopping by. — Wyliepedia 03:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

How to fix Google Knowledge Graph

Hi CAWylie, I saw your contributions to L'Wren Scott. Happily the Google Knowledge Graph no longer pulls up the morbid recent events and reflects a better lead-in. I just noticed the google graph still pulls up the wrong birthdate. Any idea how to fix this? Thanks in advance Victoriasays (talk) 01:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, not my field of expertise. — Wyliepedia 02:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks, will dig further. Victoriasays (talk) 21:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for catching this

Thanks for catching the mistake in my reversion of the other guy's edit. I shoulda paid closer attention. :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

'S all good. — Wyliepedia 20:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

White Collar article

Thanks for your help editing the White Collar artcle with the season 6 information. I have tried to make the same edits here (but they got deleted), and then another editor (new to Wikipedia) came along and made the same edits (see talk). Anyway, I support your edits, and would appreciate your help in developing consensus for the article.

Also, the article probably needs a general overhaul at this point (as CXWong has suggested), but I'm not sure I have that much time resource to work on it, but I could help support the edits. I really just wanted to make the edit about Season 6 information available for those people that need to find it. BTW, I don't see why the deadline.com is not a valid reference, and I went ahead and added it back. Nodekeeper (talk) 02:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for stopping by. Unfortunately, I agree with Drmargi's continuing removal of said Deadline source. I also have been one to remove it, as it clearly states "There is no official word yet, but I hear the network and series producer Fox TV Studios are finalizing the deal." The difference between that and the current/most recent TVBTN source? "The network also announced that it has renewed fan-favorite White Collar for a sixth season." The network officially announced it. — Wyliepedia 05:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

When Calls the Heart

Please undo the revision you did to the summary of episode 11 (which I originally wrote). There are some countries, like Canada, that haven't had the episodes air yet and I don't think it's right to give that much of the plot away to those looking for an idea of what the series is about. That's the only reason I made any edits to the summary of episode 10 is because I felt it gave a little too much away. If this offended you in some way, I apologize, but this was my reasoning behind the edit. Please change the summary of episode 11 back to the one I originally wrote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PSmommy25 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

First of all, "your" summaries were a copyright violation from Hallmark's press release of the episode.

Here is a sample of Hallmark's PR, taken from here: "Jack (Daniel Lissing) is hailed a hero after putting away the Tolliver outlaws, and has decided to come back to Coal Valley for good. But his return to town—and to Elizabeth (Erin Krakow)—is unexpectedly complicated by the arrival of gorgeous big-city actress, Rosemary LeVeaux (Pascale Hutton), Jack’s ex-fiancée."

And here is yours: "Jack is hailed a hero after putting away the Tolliver outlaws, and has decided to come back to Coal Valley for good. But his return to town—and to Elizabeth—is unexpectedly complicated by the arrival of gorgeous big-city actress."

Secondly, as I said in my edit summary, WP:SPOILER covers shows that have aired in their original countries. Motive is another example. It airs in Canada first, but we have detailed summaries of those aired, even though it has yet to air in the States. As I said, if people aren't smart enough to not visit WP before it airs where they are, that's their fault. Caveat lector. — Wyliepedia 05:17, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Castle and spoilers

Just double checking to be sure you know my comments about spoilers were directed at Scottygang, not you. We edit conflicted!! I'm so weary of these Castle fangirls. --Drmargi (talk) 06:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. Uninformed fangirls at that. When it popped up that I had a message, I half-expected it to be him/her/them bringing it here. — Wyliepedia 06:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk page FAQs

Hey, I see you are the creator of Talk:Deaths_in_2014/FAQ. I thought I'd ask you: how does one go about creating an FAQ on a talk page? Does there need to be a discussion with consensus reached? Or can I just create one and see what people think? Given the repeated questions on Talk:Islamophobia I thought it might be useful to create one there (as well as some other pages). Cheers! EvergreenFir (talk) 01:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. The Deaths FAQ arose from several discussions about the recurring questions/problems on the page. The best advice I can give is to create a sandbox for Islamophobia (using your screen name) and mention it/link to it at the article's talkpage. If you cover most of the past arising questions, they should agree on it, then you can add it in. (Never add it before discussing it, at its talkpage.) Hope this helps! — Wyliepedia 02:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Awesome. Thanks! EvergreenFir (talk) 02:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

WG list

Pertaining to Talk:List of WordGirl episodes reply I'm not sure what you mean about it being fixed according to every other episode list. I was pointing out a difference in the display, that season 3 is organized chronologically (not by episode number) and that season 4 is organized by episode number (not chronologically) so it isn't consistent.

It's hard to rely on this stuff one way or the other since in most cases, references haven't been provided to support either the air date OR the episode number. Ranze (talk) 03:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

I sorted it the way most others are, by given airdate. If anything listed is incorrect, that can be easily fixed. If anything needs sourced, that can be done too. I'm not a fan of the show; I just made compliance changes. If this list was comprised from fansites or IMDB, well, shame on them. — Wyliepedia 05:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Spacing is good

Spacing and punctuation are good things.

If you do not like spacing and punctuation then you might like to follow the example of many wikipedians that use Template:Unbulletedlist and do not include any spaces at all. It is a pain for anyone else to read and make changes to but some people seem to hate spacing and indentation and that is what they all seem to use. A few extra special weirdos use Template:Flatlist.

If you read the talk pages though you will see that Template:Plain list is about avoiding manual line break tags <br /> and making sure that lists are formatted semantically as lists. It is a small difference but, there are lots of little small differences that are slightly more correct and slightly better. There are more rules than anyone can know but think more carefully before you revert harmless improvements, like one less spelling error. There is no reason to revert my change. -- 109.77.17.179 (talk) 01:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

I honestly do not know what your problem is. I go by what Template:Infobox television ascribes to. It suggests using Template:PLAINLIST (one word!) or the unbulleted one. I don't care which, but your spaced template redirects to the one used in Wikipedia long before you started editing here, which is why I suggested you take up the space issue there. I will leave your "issue" alone, but prepare for others to fix it. End of discussion. — Wyliepedia 01:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Rashad

Sorry about this, I didn't mean to change the Bartošová text back. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 12:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

That's okay. I make a lot of mistakes too. — Wyliepedia 12:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Query regarding link

Hello, I want to add an external link of facebook(https://www.facebook.com/24LiveAnotherDayOnFox )on this Wikipedia page(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24:_Live_Another_Day). can i know what's is the problem. please explain me. thanks cristine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristine nickol (talk • contribs) 11:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Of course, please see #10 here. Thanks. — Wyliepedia 12:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages with links

I'm having a hard time understanding why you made this edit, when the links to Ordnance plainly have not been fixed? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Apologies. I think I was going about it the wrong way. I believe I have fixed them now, using this tool. — Wyliepedia 18:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

just curious where you're getting your dab information from re North Van

I noted this re Gordon Gibson and wonder which radio station that was, and how you would know where its offices were; the most likely place for such a radio station in that era would seem to me to have been in the city, not the district; maybe you know different?Skookum1 (talk) 02:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I changed it to the city. That edit was an hour-long dab fix for all the articles listing North Vancouver as "North Vancouver, British Columbia". As for the station location, that is why such information needs cites, which is another problem found in my afternoon of fixing dabs. — Wyliepedia 03:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Abraham Woodhull - Thanks

Thanks for changing my message in the form of a hatnote to a template. I knew a template existed and spent some time looking for it without success. I have been working on articles about the Culper Ring and some of its members because I found them incomplete and not really up to what we would like. Unfortunately, the ring and its members are the subject of the current AMC series Turn and these rather poor articles, with some downright errors, were viewed by tens of thousands of readers before I started to work on them. I knew it would take some time so I have made some improvements, written a new article on Anna Strong (spy) and will continue to work on them. I left the note mainly to tell new or further readers that these articles will be improved. The template does this better than a hatnote. Donner60 (talk) 07:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. Good luck with the articles. I'm usually the one who does the episode summaries for Turn here. Not easy to keep them under 300 words! — Wyliepedia 07:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Crisis NBC.jpg

You're absolutely correct that this version of File:2014 Crisis NBC.jpg is what should be used in the Crisis (TV series) infobox. However, your version of the file consists only of text, which is ineligible for copyright, unlike the original version, which is clearly non-free. I've uploaded your version to commons as File:Crisis (TV series) intertitle.jpg and nominated the non-free version for deletion. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Helenburgle1947

I see that you undid a recent edit by Helenburgle1947 to the article "Markets Now"". I just undid Helenburgle1947's most recent edit to the same article. --LukasMatt (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Date formats

I saw you added "of" in the dates, so I followed the edit format you made. By the way, I already removed the refs and organized it in the template can it be B-class by right now? Anyway, thanks for advice! FairyTailRocks 10:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Do you have a URL link to my "of"? 'Cause I don't believe I did. — Wyliepedia 10:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Oops. I apologize, I did not notice that I was the one doing that! I was in a haste in using an another laptop because my own has crashed. Thanks! FairyTailRocks 11:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

WordGirl

Regarding this section how come "A World Without WordGirl" is listed at the end as episode 78? The December 2011 air date makes it look like it should fit between 72 and 73. Ranze (talk) 13:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Because whoever did the season article set it up that way. Wasn't I, said the fly. — Wyliepedia 15:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Part of me wants to rearrange the whole thing based on date but I'm hesitant to do so in case there is actually an official basis for the strange order. I'm thinking perhaps the longer movies got a pre-release and their episode numbering is based upon when the films were broken into segments and aired on regular PBS. Ranze (talk) 18:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Wherever any episodes are released onto DVD, that should be their "airdate", in my opinion. Case in point, which also apparently aired same day as DVD release. The airdate sections for them can be worded to say so. Episodes should be listed when first aired, not by episode/production number. Matter of fact, ep number should change to when the date falls in line. — Wyliepedia 18:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Latest at Fargo

I'm for hatting that pointless new "discussion". That's an editor with an ax to grind, and the discussion is adding nothing constructive. What do you think? --Drmargi (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. Chawms has left the discussion, since we quit responding (best decision ever), and has now added the title allusions to the episode articles, which is a compromise to me. — Wyliepedia 20:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

I never did see what all his pouting and whining was about. Glad he found a place for the allusions; he never did pay attention to Drovethrughosts suggestion while he was busy having his tantrum. I don't plan to engage the new ax grinder, you're out and it's nothing but self-indulgent nonsense. I'll hat it when I have a few minutes to do it properly. --Drmargi (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Makes ya wonder what a personal one-on-one discussion would be like. Would hate to say the sky isn't blue! — Wyliepedia 21:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

We'll, it's hatted. Best thing to do is ignore it. --Drmargi (talk) 17:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Chester Nez

Hello! Your submission of Chester Nez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 15:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Red Road

Hey, just wanted to let you know someone has been vandalising the Red Road page. Figured I would give you the heads up as you are the last registered user to make changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.176.152.13 (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Reverted. Feel to register and fix it yourself, if it bothers you so badly. — Wyliepedia 23:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Don Davis (record producer)

If I've inadvertently removed any of your edits, I apologise - multiple edit conflicts. I'll hold off now. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

That's okay, I think I'm finished now. You found more than I did. — Wyliepedia 09:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Moves

Please do not move a page to a new title by copying and pasting the contents - this causes the page's history to be lost and creates attribution problems. Take a read through WP:MOVE for more details. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Yep, I knew better. Read somewhere (link escapes me) about history merge problems, which is why I did that. Hopefully, if more episode articles are done, people will know how to properly title them. — Wyliepedia 00:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

TBBT Assessments

Thank you for your recent assessments of several articles I pointed out on WP:TV/Assessments. Although I don't "own" the articles in question, I have been a main or sole contributor on them. I am always looking to improve my writing and wonder if you could take the time to suggest any improvements that could be made - either general or specific issues. For instance, I do not see any obvious reason for "The Convention Conundrum" not meeting the 6 B-class criteria. Bilorv ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 16:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Consider them lucky to be listed that high. As you can see on The Love Car Displacement's talkpage, there are some people who cry out when episode articles get created that do not have much of a notable impact. It seems you might be trying to push these into GA/FA status. If so, there should be more added to them. Please peruse those listed here for ideas. As for the B-class criteria, you will find most listed at the link have more in-depth sections. — Wyliepedia 16:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for Making Me Feel very old

Mel Brooks will be 88 tomorrow. I don't know how that is possible. Blazing Saddles is still the best Comedy ever written. The stuff he and Richard Pryor got away with was unbelievable even by today's standard.Sunnydoo (talk) 12:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

"Excuse me while I whip this out." He was the second oldest living person that I saw on the date's Births. I thought more people would recognize his name. — Wyliepedia 12:08, 27 June 2014 (UTC)