Bcome1946

Bcome1946, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bcome1946! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jimmy McKee and the Excelsior Club

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Bcome1946, thanks for creating Jimmy McKee and the Excelsior Club!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article reads more like a school report than an encyclopedia article. This could be remedied by using an informative style rather than the current narrative one. Further, the title should be changed to better reflect the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 22:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Alexander Sr

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kelly Alexander Sr, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. European Roads (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Greetings! It appears that you have been directly adding stub categories to articles such as Don W King. Stub categories should only be added by templates, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. These templates automatically add any relevant stub categories. Adding the category directly creates problems if there is a need at some later date to change stub category names or to split stub categories. Using stub templates is also recommended as they add prompting messages to editors reading stub articles. Your work in sorting these stub articles is very useful, but it would be even more useful and greatly appreciated if you could use stub templates to do so! Thank you. (This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy by Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting, and should not be considered personal in nature.) Cmr08 (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Want to help shape the future of the Wikipedia editing experience?

Hi Bcome1946,

The Design Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation is currently seeking relatively newcomer Wikipedians for user studies about their experience with current editing tools and to test out some prototype editing tools. If you’re interested in helping to shape the future of editing on Wikipedia, we would love to have you participate! The study session will take approximately 30 minutes, maximum of 45 minutes.

The study will take place in the next couple weeks, and will require participants to have access to a webcam and microphone (or a laptop with built in cam & mic), with a quiet place to go for a research session. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org and include the following information:

• Username
• Email where we can reach you
• Your city or time zone
• Best time to talk to you

Please let me know if you have any questions! Look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Daisy Chen

User Experience Researcher Dchen (WMF) (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Metrolina Library Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Metrolina Library Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Roslyn Mickelson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Roslyn Mickelson, Bcome1946!

Wikipedia editor WikiDan61 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article does not sufficiently support the notability of its subject. If this issue is not addressed, the article will likely be nominated for deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on WikiDan61's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Minnie Stowe Puett

Hello, Bcome1946. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Minnie Stowe Puett, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Minnie Stowe Puett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minnie Stowe Puett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnie Stowe Puett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Minor edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bcome1946. Please also take a look at Wikipedia:Minor edit#When not to mark. Some of the edits you have been making, such as this one for example, are not really considered to be minor edits for Wikipedia's purposes and conitnuing to label these types of edits as minor might eventually be seen as disruptive by others. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sue L. Henry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sue L. Henry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue L. Henry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Reginald Hawkins) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Reginald Hawkins, Bcome1946!

Wikipedia editor Teblick just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

{{{3}}}

To reply, leave a comment on Teblick's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Eddie Blick (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't know what caused the message above to appear as it does. My original comment suggested that you might want to expand your article by using additional sources. I tried searching Google Books using "Reginald Hawkins" and "integration" and found a number of possible sources that you might check. See this page for the results. Eddie Blick (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Regional AIDS Interfaith Network (RAIN)

Hello, Bcome1946. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Regional AIDS Interfaith Network (RAIN), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 19:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Regional Aids Interfaith Network ( RAIN)

Hello, Bcome1946. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Regional Aids Interfaith Network".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)