Listing for AWB automation

I use your TemplateParam to clean up bad parameters. Great. Now in cases, a template has many multiple bad parameters, one at a time (|capatity=). Infobox school has dozens of such parameters, each with only one bad instance. I want to edit each bad page to have it removed from the list, usually by WP:AWB (or JS script AWB).

My request is: is there an option to copy/download a full list of all single wrong article pages? (today, I have to open a TemplateParam subpage and c/p its name into AWB). - DePiep (talk) 23:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

@DePiep: I have add a new page that lists articles with invalid parameters. The link is titled "Invalid parameter page list" down near the bottom of the main template page. Down at the bottom of the invalid parameter page is wikitext that can be saved to a file or pasted into a wiki page for use with AWB. --Bamyers99 (talk) 03:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Bull's eye! Thanks. -DePiep (talk) 11:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@DePiep: I have updated it to only show parameters with < 50 unique values. --Bamyers99 (talk) 15:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Very helpful indeed (Those 10+ are OK to copy from the page list & treat separately, is my Mod of Operation). - DePiep (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:American management scientists has been nominated for discussion

 

Category:American management scientists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Listing for WikiProject R&B and Soul Music?

Would you please add a cleanup listing for WikiProject R&B and Soul Music? Thank you! Ziggyfan23 (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ziggyfan23: It has been added. I have added a link to it at Wikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music#Tools for this listing.--Bamyers99 (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Monthly error report updates?

I don't know if you are the right person to ask, but do you know when the TemplateData monthly error reports typically update? This one is dated 2018-01-01, so I would have expected an update on 2018-02-01, but it is now two days later than that. Thanks for any help you can offer. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: The error reports are generated from a database dump. The dump is as of the 1st of the month, but it takes a couple of days for the dump to finish. The error report can't be generated until the pages-articles.xml.bz2 dump has completed. --Bamyers99 (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Peter Adriaens tag

Hi, I've left a message on the talk page of a page you've previously editing, the Peter Adriaens article, which my COI prevents me from editing about having the tag removed from the page. I'd love your input. Thanks! Alex Thermopolis —Preceding undated comment added 15:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 11

 
Newsletter • February 2018

Check out this month's issue of the WikiProject X newsletter, with plans to renew work with a followup grant proposal to support finalising the deployment of CollaborationKit!

-— Isarra 21:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Weather Radio category snafu

The revision of mine you undid has a funny situation behind it:

  • I created the NOAA Weather Radio stations category (in order to keep articles about NWR from being overwhelmed by the hundreds of articles about individual transmitters), and also initially added the NOAA Weather Radio category, because as you said, it seemed right to me.
  • But while I was retagging all of those NWR station articles for the new category, that NOAA Weather Radio category tag appeared as a _sub_-category, which I had never seen before, and didn't really seem right, and made the list very confusing, so I deleted it.
  • Now that you've restored the category, I can find no trace of the behavior I described above in either the current article or in the version history.

Any idea what caused the behavior I was seeing?

In any case, thanks for restoring the category in a way that somehow avoided the snafu I described above.PetesGuide (talk) (K6WEB) 00:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

@PetesGuide: No idea. --Bamyers99 (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Stubs in the Signpost

Thank you for leaving your comment after the humour signpost article. I hope you know that I am not mocking you, as one editor has suggested. I find the behavior of bots entertaining and like to share that with people. Actually, I admit to being jealous of editors who know how to create bots. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS)   23:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@Barbara (WVS): I found the article humorous. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for adding those categories back, I just realized I had accidently removed them when I saw you had just added them back. :) —Charles Edward (Talk | Contribs) 00:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Cleaning up Jews

For a couple of weeks now, CleanupWorklistBot has been treating Category:Ashkenazi Jews as a cleanup category. I can't trace where the error crept in, but it obviously isn't a cleanup category. Thanks for your work maintaining the bot. DrKay (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@DrKay: Thanks for reporting this issue. The error has been fixed and the listings regenerated. --Bamyers99 (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, March 2018

Bots Newsletter, March 2018
 

Greetings!

Here is the 5th issue of the Bots Newsletter (formerly the BAG Newletter). You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM
BAG
BRFAs

We currently have 6 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing!

Discussions

While there were no large-scale bot-related discussion in the past few months, you can check WP:BOTN and WT:BOTPOL (and their corresponding archives) for smaller issues that came up.

New things
Upcoming

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 03:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Template Data reports

Could you please take a look at this.

{{Sfn}} [36]
Has [37] (invalid parameters used, when <50).

However, the parameter |nopp= is Not legal, and has 448 usages (so >50). Stil, many are listed in the invalids-list. Is this a because the number of pages (not transclusions) is below 50? In that case it makes some sense, but the page listing has some 80+(?). Or is this a counter misinterpretation (write the first 50 in the <50 list?). - DePiep (talk) 22:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@DePiep: |nopp= only has 3 "unique" values: y, y., and yes. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
I see. - DePiep (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
  • No big issue, but maybe in case you want perfectionism:
About {{Cquote}}. It lists page God-fearer for having parameter |first1= etc. However, these are parameters inside a <ref>{{cite book|...}}</ref> construct that renders OK. - DePiep (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
@DePiep: If you are referring to reference 10, I don't see a cite book in there. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
OK. Sorry, sloppy bad bug report I made. - DePiep (talk) 19:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

CWGC Wikidata edits

Hi there. I noticed the edits you made on Wikidata relating to the CWGC properties. I have been (slowly) working on the pages on Wikipedia that use links to the CWGC site. Would it be possible to co-ordinate the work on this? It will take me time to pull together links to previous discussions, but the comment I made here is a starting point. Carcharoth (talk) 12:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Bit puzzled. The list I have of 'people' pages using CWGC links (which I know is not all the Wikipedia articles that could have links, as some are missing the links) is 'only' 1626, and that includes some indeterminate number of relatives where the casualty link is not the person who the article is about (the Wikidata listing, if complete, is 1708, some of which are only in other language Wikipedias). One of the motivations for doing this was to work out which people in the CWGC database have Wikipedia articles. I thought that the way I was approaching this (starting from the use of CWGC external links) was one way to work that out (at least in part), but it seems that you are matching articles and CWGC ids in a different way? For Lancelot Holland you created the CWGC person id claim, but there is no indication in the en-Wikipedia article about the CWGC id. Did you maybe get the id from another language article, or are you matching direct with a different list? Carcharoth (talk) 12:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Am currently trying to match (in an Excel spreadsheet) the two lists (1626 and 1708) and it is throwing up some corrections that are needed. For example, Angus McLeod (footballer) shows up on the list of articles with an external link to their casualty details, but they don't appear on the list of articles that have the CWGC person ID. You added the CWGC person ID as the CWGC burial ID. I changed that here. I did five other corrections: [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. I think I found all the corrections needed - is there a way to double-check? Carcharoth (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Eddie Jones

Thanks for fixing that. Somehow I deleted most of the article, must have been daydreaming. --hippo43 (talk) 00:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't know what I'm doing

I'm trying to add a feed for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights Movement with Portal:Civil Rights Movement in the History section. I'm very lost. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

@Mitchumch: I have created the User:AlexNewArtBot/CivilRightsMovement rules with some civil rights keywords. Feel free to add more. Note that a space is replaced with \s and the rules are case-insensitive. Rule changes can be tested here. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

TemplateData monthly report: template not in report

  • Q1. I have a metatemplate that has documentation with TemplateData ({{Infobox element}}). That template is used in e.g. {{Infobox gold}}, the meta documentation page is transcluded into that template. The template is transcluded in article Gold (it has only 1 transclusion).
Now the TemplateData is visible in {{Infobox gold}} (I can not check if to-me infamiliar Visual Editor is working). But the template does not appear in the monthly report.
Could it be that the staged transclusion is causing this absence? Or the fact that it only has one tc? (This example is trivial, I don't need to check that infobox. But in another template set, {{HMS}}, I would like to transclude the TemplateData some 50 times. I hope the TD mer picks those up!).
@DePiep: {{Infobox gold}} doesn't take any parameters. No parameters = no report. The bot only scans template usage in the Article namespace, and not template usage in the Template namespace. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Wow. I just did not see that. thx - DePiep (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Q2. Another question. I plan to create a template that returns a link to the TD monthly report (~same as you build in {{TemplateData header}}). I suggest name {{TD monthly error report}} but shortcut {{TD mer}}. Would that be OK or do you have a better suggestion? It cold also be used for some project page: WP:TD mer. - DePiep (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
@DePiep: Is {{Template error report}} what you are looking for? --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Yes! Why did you keep this a secret? ;-) -DePiep (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Assistance adding CleanupWorklist bot to Project

I knew this tool had to exist! Alas, I'm stuck on the project test tool phase. I'm trying to add the bot to the Private Equity WikiProject and it simply can't be found by the test tool. Do I just... add it to the Master project list myself? I don't want to encroach. Let me know as you can, this seems like a fantastic mechanism! Thank you :) Pegnawl (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

@Pegnawl: I have added Private Equity to the bot master list. --Bamyers99 (talk) 13:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! It still isn't being recognized by the tool - anything else I'm missing? Do I need it to be recognized by the tool before I add the template to the project page? Pegnawl (talk) 16:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
@Pegnawl: I had to specify WikiProject_Private_Equity_Articles for the category override because the Private Equity WikiProject does not use the usual quality/importance ranking categories. You can add the template to the project page. The cleanup listing is available. --Bamyers99 (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed! You are awesome, so many thanks! Pegnawl (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)