Pegnawl

Welcome!

Hello, Pegnawl, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! shoy (reactions) 15:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Levine Leichtman Capital Partners

The article Levine Leichtman Capital Partners has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP as written. No independent WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 15:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Levine Leichtman Capital Partners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Levine Leichtman Capital Partners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levine Leichtman Capital Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 17:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Baraboo NAZI salute photo

Please explain your concerns on the talk page regarding OR and recentism. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 21:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Done. Pegnawl (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your thoughts on RLH page

Hi Pegnawl, Thanks for helping us keep the RLH page up to wiki standards. I see where you are coming from about keeping the first paragraph simple per the wiki style manual. What would you think if I were to add a section "Investment Criteria" to the page and I could put into that section the info about RLH's criteria that you deleted? InvestorPE (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @InvestorPE:, you should bring this up on the RLH Talk Page so that there's a more easily accessible track record of the discussion. Personally I think that a new section for this purpose is a fine idea, but the content you want included is still hugely promotional and will certainly be challenged. Two very clear instances of promotion are in the line "makes investments in profitable enterprises" and the entirety of bullet point iii (the three references don't even mention Riordan, so what you're doing here is Original Research). Pegnawl (talk) 13:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Deep Knowledge Group

Wow! How did you find this [1] ? This is quite a bit more than a press release. And I did not previously come to this website. Previously, I came to a one page website with virtually no relevant information. I'm guessing my search words were off. Well, I am officially amazed. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there @Steve Quinn:! I searched their website for mention of "phone" and this came up. It's still all very strange, so I was secretly hoping you'd call the number and report back :D Pegnawl (talk) 21:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

(edit conflict) LOL! OK. Sure thing. I'll get right back to ya! :>) ---Steve Quinn (talk)

FYI, found another phone number and human appended to a press release. I wonder if searching the company on Baidu or Yandex would yield more information. Pegnawl (talk) 21:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes, this is interesting. This was briefly covered in some of the RS that Cunard posted. But the coverage was not too detailed. This press release seems to have more detail, so I look forward to reading it. Thanks for finding this. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon McNeill has been accepted

Jon McNeill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 06:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bracken Darrell has been accepted

Bracken Darrell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 07:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Energy Capital Partners

Hello Pegnawl. I noticed your recent edits on the Energy Capital Partners article, and your membership in the Wikipedia Private Equity Task Force. Recently, I posted a request for additions on the article Talk page that would consolidate and clarify some of the content. I'd be grateful for your review and help. I am of course happy to work with you as necessary in implementing these changes. Thank you Californiabri19 (talk) 14:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi again. I took your recent comments under advisement and modified the Talk page request accordingly. I'm happy to implement if you give the OK. Thanks, Californiabri19 (talk) 19:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)