Your account will be renamed

edit

22:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

10:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Fluorochomasia.pdf

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Fluorochomasia.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Fluorochromasia

edit
 

The article Fluorochromasia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While this is almost certainly a valid scientific topic, the condition of this article illustrates an article that needs to be blown up and started over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Saving

edit

I was writing a new article in Wizard and lost everything. How can I save my writings?

  • My personal recommendation: Add "importScript('User:Gryllida/js/addInstantSaveToCodeEditor.js');" to meta:Special:MyPage/global.js. Then your edit box will have 'Instant Save' button which saves your content immediately and allows you to continue editing it. This is ok if the content is not in the main namespace; saving incomplete work in main namespace may result in its quick removal (depending on how incomplete it is).
  • Another option is to write the article in a word processor program which auto-saves the content to a file on your personal computer. Once you have finished, copy it to Wikipedia. Gryllida (talk) 01:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

editing newly created sandbox2

edit

I created a new sandbox2. but there is NO button to see it in Wikipedia format.

Please help me with...

Autoctono~enwiki (talk) 22:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

All of the contributions you make to Wikipedia can be viewed at Special:Contributions/Autoctono~enwiki (or by clicking Contributions at the top of the page). The particular sandbox you're looking for can be found at User:Autoctono~enwiki/sandbox2. Bradv 22:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Boris Rotman moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Boris Rotman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bradv 01:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fluorochromasia for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fluorochromasia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluorochromasia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris Rotman (August 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Catrìona (talk) 22:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Autoctono~enwiki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 22:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Boris Rotman has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boris Rotman. Thanks! Catrìona (talk) 22:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Autoctono~enwiki! You created a thread called Footnotes at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris Rotman has been accepted

edit
 
Boris Rotman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Help me!

edit

Please help me with the need for verification. What document do I need to submit?

Autoctono~enwiki 00:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC) Autoctono~enwiki 00:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Usually, when Wikipedians talk about verification, they are referring to the need to supply a reliable source for a fact stated in an article. Secondary sources are preferred. There is no document to submit, you simply have to prepare a citation to the source that can be included in the article. You seem to be too experienced for me to suggest referencing for beginners, but that is not a bad place to start. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Further conversation about the Boris Rotman article, specifically, should occur at Talk:Boris Rotman. I've started a section there about the problems with missing citations. Has anyone asked if you had a connection with Rotman? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Marten Scheffer, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Schematic view of fluorochromasia molecular mechanism.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file that is redundant to File:Schematic diagram of fluorochromasia molecular mechanism.pdf, which is superior because it shows the entire title, while part of the title of this one is cut off.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 15:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply