213.14.255.20

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leninist historiography has been accepted

Leninist historiography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amberlihisar has been accepted

Amberlihisar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wrath of Roses (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wrath of Roses and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 213.14.255.20! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (213.14.255.20) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Symnkyie (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Symnkyie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notified

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ^Complex/_Rational 01:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@ComplexRational I was going to reply to the ANI post but you blocked me even without giving me time to reply to Wikaviani's accusations. Why do you block me even without hearing my side of the story? 213.14.255.20 (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

I read the full thread at Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.

Even if you disagree with consensus, it is inappropriate to engage in edit warring or make repeated requests (e.g., changing an edit request to unanswered) in the hope of finding an editor who shares your opinion. These behaviors are considered disruptive, and you have not heeded multiple warnings to disengage, both on this page and at the talk page; please re-read the advice given to you before commenting further. ^Complex/_Rational 01:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@ComplexRational What you are referring as "edit warring" was my removal of the accusation of trolling by Wikaviani. Accusations without evidence are a form of personal attack. In that thread, I shared my opinion based on reliable sources but I was accused of trolling without any provocation. There has been no single edit by me that violated any policies to warrant such an accusation. Therefore, I view your block as unfairly implemented. 213.14.255.20 (talk) 01:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

While I do not condone calling other editors trolls, as I have noted at the ANI post, it is usually inappropriate to edit or remove others' talk page comments, as outlined in the talk page guidelines. The {{RPA}} template is intended for removing serious personal attacks, not every remark that may be construed as uncivil. And despite being warned about this, you reinstated your removal twice, and then seemingly discarded the other editors' feedback and re-opened your edit request. This is not how consensus building works – in fact, quite the opposite. ^Complex/_Rational 02:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@ComplexRational Even if you are right on that I should have not used RPA template, I've not violated 3RR.[1][2][3] You may argue that edit warring may occur even if 3RR is not violated but remind you this was a heated dispute, and even sometimes longstanding regular editors may fall into the carelessness of edit warring in such cases. And yes, I did activate the request after the warning, but there was a talk page message box that said This edit request has been answered. Set the answered or ans parameter to no to reactivate your request. This caused me to believe that I was allowed to set it to "no" if I wanted. There was no ill intention in my reactivation. 213.14.255.20 (talk) 03:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Indeed, no 3RR violation occurred, though edit warring is counterproductive in any case, and longstanding editors likewise can get blocked for 3RR violations.

I encourage you to read the guidelines on making edit requests before trying again. In particular, keep in mind that controversial requests are likely to be rejected, and that the only way to possibly reach a different outcome is by forming a new consensus. Your block will expire in a few hours, after which you are free to edit and discuss constructively. I hope that no misunderstandings occur thereafter, and I welcome any further questions that you might have. ^Complex/_Rational 21:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@ComplexRational But there is something else too. Wikavani placed on my talk page a vandalism warning. WP:VANDALISM states Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. You have relied on this warning to block me. As I have told you and you have not objected, I've not made bad faith edits even if they were disruptive. From my perspective, I made multiple reverts in order to remove a perceived violation. In this case, I think you cannot claim I made an intentional attempt to worsen the encyclopedia, right? Don't you think it was unfair to base your blocking on a misleading warning? 213.14.255.20 (talk) 23:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@ComplexRational Besides you must have superhuman level cognitive abilities to read the ANI post, then read all of the discussion (which consists of 2200+ words) and then block me in 10 minutes. This makes me think that your claims of impartiality are not accurate and this block is hastily carried out without due care. 213.14.255.20 (talk) 01:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm flattered. Just keep in mind that commenting on other editors won't make your arguments any stronger. ^Complex/_Rational 02:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Concern regarding Draft:The Wrath of Roses

Hello, 213.14.255.20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Wrath of Roses, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Symnkyie

Hello, 213.14.255.20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Symnkyie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Wrath of Roses

Hello, 213.14.255.20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Wrath of Roses".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Symnkyie

Hello, 213.14.255.20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Symnkyie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Battle of Vienna—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Amberlihisar

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Amberlihisar, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Leninist historiography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leninist historiography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leninist historiography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Queen of Hearts ❤️ (no relation) 01:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

---