Abd al-Malik
Amīr al-muʾminīn
Khalīfat Allāh[a]
Gold dinar minted by the Umayyads in 695, which likely depicts Abd al-Malik
5th Caliph of the Umayyad Caliphate
Reign12 April 685 – 9 October 705
PredecessorMarwan I
SuccessorAl-Walid I
Born646/47
Medina, Rashidun Caliphate
Died9 October 705
Damascus, Umayyad Caliphate
Burial
Outside of Bab al-Jabiya, Damascus
SpouseWallāda bint al-ʿAbbās ibn al-Jazʾ al-ʿAbsīyya
ʿĀtika bint Yazīd I
ʿĀʾisha bint Hishām ibn Ismāʿīl al-Makhzūmīyya
Umm Ayyūb bint ʿAmr ibn ʿUthmān ibn ʿAffān
ʿĀʾisha bint Mūsā ibn Ṭalḥa ibn ʿUbaydallāh
Umm al-Mughīra bint al-Mughīra ibn Khālid
IssueAl-Walīd I
Sulaymān
Marwān al-Akbar
Yazīd II
Marwān al-Aṣghar
Muʿāwiya
Hishām
Abū Bakr Bakkār
Al-Ḥakam
ʿAbd Allāh
Maslama
Saʿīd al-Khayr
Al-Mundhir
ʿAnbasa
Muḥammad
Al-Ḥajjāj
Umm Kulthūm (daughter)
ʿĀʾisha (daughter)
Fāṭima (daughter)
Names
Abū al-Walīd ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam
HouseMarwanid
DynastyUmayyad
FatherMarwān I
MotherʿĀʾisha bint Muʿāwiya ibn al-Mughīra

ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam (Arabic: عبد الملك ابن مروان, 646/47–9 October 705) was the fifth Umayyad caliph, ruling from 685 until his death.

Abd al-Malik belonged to the first generation of born Muslims and his early life in Medina was occupied by pious pursuits. He held various administrative or military posts under his father, the governor of Medina, Marwan ibn al-Hakam, and Caliph Mu'awiya I (r. 661–680), founder of the Umayyad Caliphate. At the time of Abd al-Malik's accession, Umayyad authority had collapsed as a result of the Second Muslim Civil War and had begun to be reconstituted in Syria and Egypt during the short reign of his father, in 684–685. After a failed invasion of Iraq in 686, Abd al-Malik focused on consolidating Syria before further attempts to conquer the rest of the caliphate from his principal rival, the Mecca-based, Caliph Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr. To that end, he concluded an unfavorable truce with a reinvigorated Byzantine Empire in 689, fended off a coup attempt in Damascus by his kinsman the following year and reincorporated the rebellious Qaysi tribes of Upper Mesopotamia into the army in 691. He subsequently conquered Zubayrid Iraq and dispatched his general, al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, to Mecca where he killed Ibn al-Zubayr by late 692, thereby reunifying the caliphate under the suzerainty of Abd al-Malik.

Al-Hajjaj ultimately became the caliph's viceroy in the east and firmly established Abd al-Malik's authority in Iraq and Khurasan, having stamped out opposition by the Kharijites and the Arab tribal nobility by 702. In the west, Abd al-Malik's brother, Abd al-Aziz, maintained peace and stability in Egypt while his troops retook Qayrawan, which later served as the launchpad for the conquests of western North Africa and Hispania. The final years of Abd al-Malik's rule were marked by domestic peace and prosperity. He was succeeded by his eldest son al-Walid I, who extensively relied on al-Hajjaj and whose reign was largely a continuation of his father's policies.

In a significant departure from his predecessors, rule over the caliphate was centralized under Abd al-Malik, following the elimination of his rivals. Gradually, loyalist Arab troops from Syria were tasked with maintaining order in the provinces as dependence on less reliable, localized Arab garrisons receded. In tandem, the traditional military stipends to veterans of the early Muslim conquests and their descendants were abolished, with salaries being restricted to those in active service. The most consequential of Abd al-Malik's reforms were the introduction of a single Islamic currency in place of Byzantine and Sasanian coinage and the establishment of Arabic as the language of the bureaucracy in place of Greek and Persian in Syria and Iraq, respectively. These measures led to renewed war with Byzantium, this time ending in Umayyad advances into Armenia. Conflict with external and domestic Christian forces and rival claimants to Islamic leadership, along with his Muslim upbringing, influenced Abd al-Malik's aforementioned efforts to proscribe a distinctly Islamic character to the Umayyad state. Another manifestation of this initiative was his founding of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, which is the earliest known religious structure built by a Muslim ruler and the possessor of the earliest epigraphic proclamations of Islam and the prophet Muhammad.

Early life edit

Abd al-Malik was born in June/July 646 in the house of his father Marwan ibn al-Hakam in Medina.[1][2] His mother was A'isha, a daughter of Mu'awiya ibn al-Mughira.[3][4] Both of his parents belonged to the Banu Umayya,[3][4] one of the strongest and wealthiest clans of the Quraysh tribe.[5] The latter had been ardent opponents of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, a member of the Quraysh, but embraced Islam in 630 and gradually dominated Muslim politics.[6] Abd al-Malik belonged to the first generation of born-Muslims and his upbringing in Medina, Islam's political center at the time, was generally described as pious and rigorous by the traditional Muslim sources.[1][7] He took a deep interest in Islam and possibly memorized the Qur'an.[8]

Abd al-Malik's father was a senior aide of their Umayyad kinsman, Caliph Uthman (r. 644–656).[1] In 656, Abd al-Malik witnessed Uthman's assassination in Medina,[3] an "event [that] had a lasting effect on him", according to historian A. A. Dixon.[9] Six years later, he distinguished himself in a campaign against the Byzantines as commander of a Medinese naval unit.[10] He was appointed to the role by Caliph Mu'awiya I (r. 661–680), founder of the Umayyad Caliphate.[3] Afterward, he returned to Medina, where he operated as an assistant of his father, who had become governor of the city.[1] As with the rest of the Umayyads in the Hejaz (western Arabia), Abd al-Malik lacked close ties with Mu'awiya, who ruled from his power base in Damascus.[1] Mu'awiya belonged to the Abu Sufyan line of the Umayyad clan, while Abd al-Malik belonged to the larger Abu al-'As line. When a revolt broke out in Medina against Mu'awiya's son and successor, Caliph Yazid I (r. 680–683), the Umayyads, including Abd al-Malik, were expelled from the city.[3] The revolt was part of the wider anti-Umayyad rebellion that became known as the Second Muslim Civil War.[3] On the way to the Umayyad capital in Syria, Abd al-Malik encountered the army of Muslim ibn Uqba, who had been sent by Yazid to subdue the rebels in Medina.[3] He subsequently provided Ibn Uqba intelligence about Medina's defenses.[3] The rebels were defeated at the Battle of al-Harra in August 683, but nonetheless the army withdrew to Syria after Yazid's death later that year.[3]

The deaths of Yazid and his son and successor Mu'awiya II in relatively quick succession in 683–684 precipitated a leadership vacuum in Damascus and the consequent collapse of Umayyad authority across the caliphate.[11] Most provinces declared their allegiance to the rival Mecca-based caliphate of Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr.[12] In parts of Syria, however, Arab tribes that had secured a privileged position in the Umayyad court and military, in particular the Banu Kalb and its allies, scrambled to preserve Umayyad rule.[12] Marwan and his family, including Abd al-Malik, had since relocated to Syria, where Marwan met the pro-Umayyad stalwart Ubayd Allah ibn Ziyad, who had just been expelled by the Zubayrids from his governorship in Iraq. Ibn Ziyad persuaded Marwan to forward his candidacy for the caliphate during a summit of pro-Umayyad tribes in Jabiya hosted by the Kalbi chieftain Ibn Bahdal.[12] The tribal nobility elected Marwan as caliph and the latter subsequently became dependent on the Kalb and its allies, who collectively became known as the "Yaman".[12] Their power came at the expense of the Qaysi tribes that dominated northern Syria and had defected to Ibn al-Zubayr.[12] The Qays were routed by Marwan and his Yamani backers at the Battle of Marj Rahit in 684, leading to a long-standing blood feud and rivalry between the two tribal coalitions.[12] Abd al-Malik did not participate in the battle, reportedly due to religiously-motivated objections, according to the contemporary poems compiled in the anthology of Abu Tammam (d. 845).[13]

Reign edit

Accession edit

Abd al-Malik became a close adviser of Marwan,[1] who appointed him governor of Palestine.[14][15] He remained headquartered in Damascus and became its deputy governor during Marwan's expedition to conquer Zubayrid Egypt in late 684.[16] He was designated by the caliph as his chosen successor, to be followed by Abd al-Malik's brother, Abd al-Aziz.[17] This designation abrogated the succession arrangements reached in Jabiya, which stipulated that Yazid's son Khalid would succeed Marwan, followed by another Umayyad, the former governor of Medina, Amr ibn Sa'id al-Ashdaq.[18] Nonetheless, Marwan secured the oaths of allegiance to Abd al-Malik from the Yamani nobility during his lifetime.[17] While historian Gerald Hawting notes Abd al-Malik was nominated despite his relative lack of political experience, Dixon maintains he was chosen "because of his political ability and his knowledge of statecraft and provincial administration", as indicated by his "gradual advance in holding important posts" from an early age.[16] Marwan died in April 685 and Abd al-Malik's subsequent accession as caliph was peacefully managed by the Yamani nobles.[1][7] He was proclaimed caliph in Jerusalem, according to a report by 9th-century historian Khalifa ibn Khayyat, which modern historian Amikam Elad considers to be seemingly "reliable".[15]

Early challenges edit

 
A map of the Islamic political scene in the Middle East in 685–687. The area highlighted in orange represents the territory controlled by Abd al-Malik, namely Syria and Egypt, while the blue and gray-shaded areas depict the lands controlled by the rival contenders of the caliphate, al-Mukhtar al-Thaqafi and Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr, respectively.

Though Umayyad rule had been restored in Syria and Egypt, Abd al-Malik faced several challenges to his authority.[1] Most provinces of the caliphate continued to recognize Ibn al-Zubayr as caliph, while the Qaysi tribes regrouped under Zufar ibn al-Harith al-Kilabi and resisted Umayyad rule in the Jazira (Upper Mesopotamia) from the Euphrates fortress of al-Qarqisiya,[19] strategically located at the crossroads of Syria and Iraq. At the time of his accession, important administrative offices were held by members of Abd al-Malik's family.[1] His brother, Muhammad, was charged with quelling the Qaysi revolt in the Jazira, while Abd al-Aziz maintained peace and stability as governor of Egypt and its dependencies in North Africa until his death in 705.[1][20]

Re-establishing Umayyad authority across the caliphate was a major priority of Abd al-Malik.[19] His initial focus was the reconquest of Iraq, the caliphate's wealthiest province.[21] Iraq was also home to a large population of Arab tribesmen,[21] the group from which the Umayyad military derived the bulk of its troops.[22] In contrast, Egypt, which provided significant income to the treasury, possessed a small Arab community and was thus a meager source of troops.[23] The demand for soldiers was pressing for the Umayyads as the backbone of their military, the Syrian army, remained fractured along Yamani and Qaysi lines. Though the roughly 6,000 Yamani troops of Abd al-Malik's predecessor were able to consolidate the Umayyad position in Syria, they were too few to reassert authority throughout the caliphate.[22] Ibn Ziyad, a key figure in the establishment of Marwanid power, set about enlarging the army by recruiting widely among the Arab tribes, including those which nominally belonged to the Qays faction.[22] He was tasked by Abd al-Malik with the reconquest of Iraq.[19] At the time, the province and its eastern dependencies were split between the pro-Alid forces of al-Mukhtar al-Thaqafi in Kufa and the forces of Ibn al-Zubayr's brother Mus'ab in Basra. In August 686, Ibn Ziyad's 60,000-strong army was routed at the Battle of Khazir and he was slain, alongside most of his deputy commanders, at the hands of al-Mukhtar's much smaller pro-Alid force led by Ibrahim ibn al-Ashtar.[3][19] The decisive defeat and the loss of Ibn Ziyad represented a major setback to Abd al-Malik's ambitions in Iraq. He refrained from further major campaigns in the province for the next five years, during which Mus'ab defeated and killed al-Mukhtar and became Iraq's sole ruler.[19][3]

Abd al-Malik shifted his focus to consolidating control of Syria.[19] His efforts in Iraq had been undermined by the Qaysi–Yamani schism when a Qaysi general in Ibn Ziyad's army, Umayr ibn al-Hubab al-Sulami, defected with his men mid-battle to join Zufar's rebellion.[22] Umayr's subsequent campaign against the large Christian Banu Taghlib tribe in the Jazira sparked a series of tit-for-tat raids and further deepened Arab tribal divisions, with the previously neutral Taghlib throwing in its lot with the Yaman and the Umayyads.[24] The Taghlib killed Umayr in 689 and delivered his head to Abd al-Malik.[25]

Along Syria's northern frontier, the Byzantines had been on the offensive since 678,[26] capturing Antioch in 688 and encouraging the Mardaites, a Christian group indigenous to Syria, to launch raids deep into Umayyad territory in the Orontes Valley.[3] The Byzantine counteroffensive represented the first challenge against a Muslim power by a people defeated in the early Muslim conquests.[26] Moreover, the Mardaite raids demonstrated to Abd al-Malik and his successors that the state could no longer depend on the quiescence of Syria's Christian majority, which until then had largely refrained from rebellion.[26] To neutralize the Byzantine threat, Abd al-Malik concluded a ten-year truce with the Byzantine emperor Justinian II in 689.[3] It stipulated a freeze in hostilities and the withdrawal of 12,000 Mardaite warriors to Byzantine territory in return for an annual Umayyad tribute of 365,000 gold coins, 1,000 slaves and 1,000 war horses to the empire.[27] Historian Khalid Yahya Blankinship described it as "an onerous and completely humiliating pact" and surmised that Abd al-Malik's ability to pay the annual tribute in addition to financing his own wartime army relied on treasury funds accrued during the campaigns of his Sufyanid predecessors and revenues from Egypt.[27]

In 689/90, Abd al-Malik used the respite from the truce to initiate a campaign against the Zubayrids of Iraq, but he was forced to return to Damascus when his kinsman al-Ashdaq launched a rebellion in the city.[3][17] The latter viewed Abd al-Malik's accession as a violation of the agreement reached in Jabiya and took advantage of the caliph's absence to seize Damascus.[17] Abd al-Malik confronted al-Ashdaq, promising him safety and freedom if he relinquished the city.[3][17] Though al-Ashdaq agreed to the terms and surrendered, Abd al-Malik remained distrustful of the former's ambitions and executed him personally.[3]

Zufar's control of al-Qarqisiya, despite earlier attempts to dislodge him by Ibn Ziyad in 685/86 and the caliph's governor in Homs, Aban ibn al-Walid ibn Uqba, in 689/90, remained an obstacle to the caliph's ambitions in Iraq.[28] Abd al-Malik resolved to command the siege of al-Qarqisiya in person in the summer of 691 and ultimately secured the surrender and defection of Zufar and the pro-Zubayrid Qays in return for privileged positions in the Umayyad court and army.[3][29][30] The integration of the Qaysi rebels strongly reinforced the Syrian army, and Umayyad authority was restored in the Jazira.[3] From then onward, Abd al-Malik and his immediate successors attempted to balance the interests of the Qays and Yaman in the Umayyad court and army.[31] This represented a break from the preceding seven years during which the Yaman, and particularly the Banu Kalb, were the dominant force of the army.[32]

Defeat of the Zubayrids edit

With threats in Syria and the Jazira neutralized, Abd al-Malik was free to focus on the reconquest of Iraq.[3][29] While Mus'ab and his loyalists had been bogged down fighting Kharijite rebels and contending with disaffected Arab tribesmen in Basra and Kufa, Abd al-Malik was establishing contacts with these same Arab nobles to win them over.[24] Thus, by the time Abd al-Malik led the reconstituted Syrian army into Iraq in 691, the struggle to recapture the province was virtually complete.[24] Unlike in the previous Iraqi campaign, command of his army was held by members of his family, with Muhammad ibn Marwan leading the vanguard and Yazid I's sons Khalid and Abd Allah leading the right and left wings, respectively.[24] Many Syrian nobles held reservations about the campaign and counseled Abd al-Malik not to participate in person.[24] Nonetheless, the caliph was at the head of the army when it camped opposite Mus'ab's forces at Maskin, along the Dujayl Canal.[29] In the ensuing battle, most of Mus'ab's forces, many of whom were resentful at the heavy toll he had inflicted on al-Mukhtar's Kufan partisans, refused to fight and his leading commander, Ibn al-Ashtar, fell at the beginning of hostilities.[29][33][34] Abd al-Malik invited Mus'ab to surrender in return for relinquishing Iraq, but the latter refused and was killed in action.[35]

 
The Ka'aba in Mecca was the headquarters of Ibn al-Zubayr where he was besieged and defeated by Abd al-Malik's forces led by al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf in 692

Following his victory, Abd al-Malik entered Kufa, received the allegiance of its nobility and appointed governors to Iraq's dependencies in Khurasan and further east.[35] He encamped with the Syrian army outside the city, at Nukhayla, for forty days in preparation for the campaign to subdue Ibn al-Zubayr in the Hejaz.[35] To that end, he dispatched a 2,000-strong Syrian contingent, at the head of which was al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf,[36][37] who had risen through the ranks to become a highly competent and efficient supporter of the caliph.[31] According to historian Gerald R. Hawting, for the period between the end of the civil war and the years after Abd al-Malik's reign, al-Hajjaj became the "dominant figure" in the medieval sources, discussed more than the caliph himself.[38] Al-Hajjaj remained encamped for several months in Ta'if, east of Mecca, where he fought numerous skirmishes with Zubayrid loyalists in the plain of Arafat.[37] Abd al-Malik sent him reinforcements led by his mawlā (pl: mawālī), Tariq ibn Amr, who had earlier captured Medina from its Zubayrid governor.[39] In March 692, al-Hajjaj besieged Ibn al-Zubayr in Mecca and bombarded the city and the Ka'aba, the holiest sanctuary in Islam.[36][39] Though 10,000 of Ibn al-Zubayr's supporters, including his sons, eventually surrendered and received pardons, Ibn al-Zubayr and a core of his loyalists held out in the Ka'aba and were killed by al-Hajjaj's troops in September or October.[36][39] Ibn al-Zubayr's death marked the end of the civil war and the reunification of the caliphate under Abd al-Malik.[36][40][41]

In the aftermath of his victory, the caliph aimed to achieve reconciliation with the Hejazi elite, including the Zubayrids and the Alids, the Umayyads' rivals within the Quraysh.[42] He relied on the Banu Makhzum, another clan of Quraysh, as his intermediaries in lieu of the Umayyad family's absence in the region due to their exile in 682.[42] Despite seeking their good offices, he remained wary of the Hejazi elite's ambitions and kept a vigilant eye on them through his various governors in Medina.[42] The first of these was al-Hajjaj, who was also appointed governor of Yemen and al-Yamama and led the Hajj pilgrim caravans of 693 and 694.[36] Though he maintained peace in the Hejaz, the harshness of his rule led to numerous complaints from its residents and may have played a role in his transfer from the post by Abd al-Malik.[36] A member of the Makhzum and Abd al-Malik's father-in-law, Hisham ibn Isma'il, was ultimately appointed. During his tenure in 701–706 he was also known for his brutal treatment of Medina's townspeople.[8]

Consolidation in Iraq and the east edit

Despite his victory, the control and governance of Iraq, a politically turbulent province from the time of the Muslim conquest in the 630s, continued to pose a major challenge for Abd al-Malik.[31] He had withdrawn the Syrian army and entrusted to the Iraqis the defense of Basra from the Kharijite threat.[24][43] However, most Iraqis had become "weary of the conflict" with the Kharijites, "which had brought them little but hardship and loss", according to Gibb.[3] Those from Kufa, in particular, had grown accustomed to the wealth and comfort of their lives at home and their reluctance to undertake lengthy campaigns far from their families was an issue that previous rulers of Iraq had consistently encountered.[38][44] Initially, the caliph appointed his brother Bishr governor of Kufa and another kinsman, Khalid ibn Abdallah, to Basra before the latter too was put under Bishr's jurisdiction.[20] Neither governor was up to the task, but the Iraqis eventually defeated the Najdiyya Kharijites in al-Yamama in 692/93.[43][45] The Azariqa in Persia were more difficult to rein in,[45] and following Bishr's death in 694, the Iraqi troops deserted the field against them at Ramhormoz.[46]

Abd al-Malik's attempt at family rule in Iraq had proven unsuccessful, and he installed al-Hajjaj in the post instead.[31] Abd al-Malik combined Kufa and Basra into a single province under al-Hajjaj, who, from the start of his rule, displayed a strong commitment to governing Iraq effectively.[31] Al-Hajjaj backed al-Muhallab ibn Abi Sufra al-Azdi, the Zubayrids' commander against the Kharijites, in his campaign against the Azariqa, whom he was able to defeat in 697.[31] This also allowed al-Muhallab to restart the Muslim conquests of Central Asia, though the campaign reaped few territorial gains during Abd al-Malik's reign.[45] Concurrently, however, a Kharijite revolt led by Shabib ibn Yazid of the Banu Shayban flared in the heart of Iraq, resulting in the rebel takeover of al-Mada'in and siege of Kufa.[45] Al-Hajjaj responded to the unwillingness or inability of the war-weary Iraqis to face the Kharijites by obtaining from Abd al-Malik 4,000–6,000 Syrian reinforcements led by commanders Sufyan ibn al-Abrad al-Kalbi and Abd al-Rahman ibn Habib al-Hakami.[45][24] A more disciplined force, the Syrians repelled the rebel attack on Kufa and killed Shabib in early 697.[45][47] By 698, the Kharijite revolts had been stamped out.[48] Abd al-Malik attached to Iraq Sistan and Khurasan, thus making al-Hajjaj responsible for a super-province encompassing the eastern half of the caliphate.[31] Al-Hajjaj kept al-Muhallab as deputy governor of Khurasan, a post he held until his death in 702, after which it was bequeathed to his son Yazid.[48][49]

In an effort to reduce expenditure, al-Hajjaj had reduced the Iraqis' pay to less than that of their Syrian counterparts in the province.[31] Moreover, upon becoming governor, he immediately threatened with death any Iraqi who refused to participate in the war efforts against the Kharijites in Khurasan.[31] By his measures, al-Hajjaj appeared "almost to have goaded the Iraqis into rebellion, as if looking for an excuse to break them", according to Kennedy.[31] Indeed, conflict with the muqātila (Arab tribal forces) of Iraq, whose men formed the province's garrisons, came to a head beginning in 699 when al-Hajjaj ordered the paramount Iraqi nobleman and governor of Kirman, Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash'ath, to lead an expedition against Zunbil, the governor of Zabul in Sistan, who had refused to pay the annual tribute to the caliphate.[48][50] Many of Ibn al-Ash'ath's troops were wealthy and leading noblemen and bristled at the frequent rebukes and demands of al-Hajjaj and the difficulties of the campaign to which they were assigned.[50] In response, Ibn al-Ash'ath declared a rebellion while in Sistan, and led his army westward through Fars, defeating al-Hajjaj's loyalists in Tustar in 701 and entering Kufa soon after.[50] Al-Hajjaj remained in Basra with his Banu Thaqif kinsmen and Syrian loyalists, who were numerically insufficient to counter the unified Iraqi front led by Ibn al-Ash'ath.[50] Alarmed at events, Abd al-Malik offered the rebels the replacement of al-Hajjaj with Ibn al-Ash'ath and a pay raise equal to the Syrians.[50] Due to his supporters' rejection of the terms, Ibn al-Ash'ath refused Abd al-Malik's offer and al-Hajjaj took the initiative and routed Ibn al-Ash'ath's forces at the Battle of Dayr al-Jamajim in April or July.[50][51] Many of the Iraqis had defected after promises of amnesty if they disarmed, while Ibn al-Ash'ath, with his remaining supporters, fled east to Zabulistan where they were dispersed in 702.[50]

The suppression of the revolt marked the end of the Iraqi muqātila as a military force and the beginning of Syrian military domination of Iraq.[45][51] Iraqi divisions and the utilization of disciplined Syrian forces by Abd al-Malik and al-Hajjaj halted the Iraqis' attempt to reassert power in the province.[50] Determined to prevent further rebellions by the Iraqis, al-Hajjaj founded a permanent Syrian army garrison in Wasit, situated between the long-established Iraqi garrison centers at Kufa and Basra, and instituted a more rigorous administration in the province.[50][51] Power thereafter derived from the Syrian troops, who became Iraq's ruling class, while Iraq's Arab nobility, religious scholars and mawālī were their virtual subjects.[50] Furthermore, the surplus taxes from the agriculturally rich Sawad lands of Iraq were redirected from the Iraqi muqātila to Abd al-Malik's treasury in Damascus to pay the Syrian troops in the province.[51][52] This reflected a wider campaign by the caliph to institute greater control over the caliphate.[52]

Renewal of Byzantine wars in Armenia and North Africa edit

Despite the ten-year truce of 689, war with Byzantium resumed following Abd al-Malik's victory against Ibn al-Zubayr in 692.[45] Hostilities were precipitated after Emperor Justinian II abrogated the truce in response to the caliph's discontinuation of Byzantine currency in his realm in favor of a Muslim currency introduced that year.[45] The Umayyads defeated the Byzantines at the Battle of Sebastopolis in circa 692 and through persistent raids in 694–695, the caliph's brother Muhammad and his Syrian troops advanced into Anatolia and Armenia, laying the foundation for further conquests of these territories under Abd al-Malik's successors.[45][53] The military defeats inflicted on Justinian II contributed to the downfall of the emperor and his Heraclian dynasty in 695.[54] Muhammad remained governor of the Jazira and Armenia and commander of military operations on the Anatolian front until 710.[55][53]

Meanwhile, in the west, Abd al-Aziz had dispatched Hassan ibn al-Nu'man with the Arab troops of Fustat to retake southern Ifriqiya province after it was recaptured by the Byzantines and their Berber allies.[45][56] From his base in Tripolitania, he advanced toward Byzantine-held Carthage in 697 with naval backing.[45][56] After Byzantine naval reinforcements sent by Emperor Leontios (r. 695–698) were repelled and the Berbers led by the warrior queen al-Kahina were defeated, Carthage was captured and sacked by 698.[45][56] The Arab garrison town in Qayrawan was firmly secured as a launchpad for further conquests under later Umayyad rulers, while on the Ifriqiyan coast, the port town of Tunis was equipped with an arsenal on the orders of Abd al-Malik, who was intent on establishing a strong Arab fleet.[45][56] Hassan was dismissed by Abd al-Aziz around this time, and replaced by the former's lieutenant, Musa ibn Nusayr,[56] who went on to oversee the later Umayyad conquests of western North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula.[57]

Final years edit

The last years of Abd al-Malik's reign were generally characterized by the sources as the peaceful and prosperous consolidation of power.[45] The blood feuds between the Qays and Yaman, which persisted despite the former's reconciliation with the Umayyads in 691, and the inter-tribal struggles between the army factions of Basra and Khurasan, had dissipated toward the end of his rule.[58] Dixon credits this to Abd al-Malik's success at "harnessing tribal feeling to the interests of the government, [while] at the same time suppressing its violent manifestations".[note 1][58] The remaining principal issue faced by the caliph was ensuring the succession of his eldest son, al-Walid I, in place of the designated successor, Abd al-Aziz.[45] The latter consistently refused Abd al-Malik's entreaties to step down from the line of succession, but potential conflict was avoided when Abd al-Aziz died in May 705.[45] He was promptly replaced as governor of Egypt by the caliph's son Abd Allah.[61] Abd al-Malik died five months later, on 9 October, and was buried outside of the Bab al-Jabiya gate of Damascus.[62]

Legacy and centralization edit

 
A map depicting growth of the Caliphate. The area highlighted in yellow depicts the expansion of territory during Abd al-Malik's reign

Abd al-Malik is referred to as the most "celebrated" Umayyad caliph by the historian Julius Wellhausen.[63] "His reign had been a period of hard-won successes", in the words of Kennedy.[49] The 9th-century historian al-Yaqubi described Abd al-Malik as "courageous, shrewd and sagacious, but also ... miserly".[64] His successor, al-Walid, continued his father's policies and his rule likely marked the peak of Umayyad power and prosperity.[38][65] Abd al-Malik's key administrative reforms, reunification of the Caliphate and suppression of all active domestic opposition enabled the major territorial expansion of the Caliphate during al-Walid's reign.[66] Three other sons of Abd al-Malik, Sulayman, Yazid II and Hisham, would rule in succession until 743, interrupted only by the rule of Abd al-Aziz's son, Umar II (r. 717–720).[38] Moreover, with the exceptions of the latter and Marwan II (r. 744–750), all of the Umayyad caliphs who came after Abd al-Malik were directly descended from him, hence the references to him as the "father of kings" in the traditional Muslim sources.[63] The Umayyad emirs and caliphs who ruled in the Iberian Peninsula between 756 and 1031 were also his direct descendants.[67] In the assessment of his biographer Chase F. Robinson, "Mu'awiya may have introduced the principle of dynastic succession into the ruling tradition of early Islam, but Abd al-Malik made it work".[67]

Abd al-Malik's concentration of power into the hands of his family was unprecedented; at one point, his brothers or sons held nearly all governorships of the provinces and Syria's districts.[68][69] Likewise, his court in Damascus was filled with far more Umayyads than under his Sufyanid predecessors, a result of the clan's exile to the city from Medina in 682.[20] He maintained close ties with the Sufyanids through marital relations and official appointments, such as according Yazid I's son Khalid a prominent role in the court and army and wedding to him his daughter A'isha.[20][70] Abd al-Malik also married Khalid's sister Atika, who became his favorite and most influential wife.[20]

After his victory in the civil war, Abd al-Malik embarked on a far-reaching campaign to consolidate Umayyad rule over the Caliphate.[52][71] The collapse of Umayyad authority precipitated by Mu'awiya I's death made it apparent to Abd al-Malik that the decentralized Sufyanid system was unsustainable.[52] Moreover, despite the defeat of his Muslim rivals, his dynasty remained domestically and externally insecure, prompting a need to legitimize its existence, according to Blankinship.[26] Abd al-Malik's solution to the fractious tribalism which defined his predecessors' caliphate was to centralize power.[45] At the same time, his response to the criticism of Muslim religious circles, which dated from the beginning of Umayyad rule and culminated with the outbreak of the civil war, was to implement Islamization measures.[72] The measures also served as an ideological dimension of his military response to the Byzantine and Christian resurgence.[26]

The centralized administration established by Abd al-Malik ultimately became the prototype of later medieval Muslim states.[52] According to Wellhausen, government "evidently became more technical and hierarchical" under Abd al-Malik, though not nearly to the extent of the later Abbasid caliphs.[73] As opposed to the freewheeling governing style of the Sufyanids, Abd al-Malik ruled strictly over his officials and kept interactions with them largely formal.[74] He put an end to the provinces keeping the lion's share of their surplus tax revenues, which he had redirected to the caliphal treasury in Damascus.[75] Abd al-Malik may have inaugurated a number of high-ranking offices, and Muslim tradition generally credits him with the organization of the barīd (postal service), whose principal purpose was to efficiently inform the caliph of developments outside of Damascus.[76] According to Kennedy, Abd al-Malik's "centralized, bureaucratic empire ... was in many ways an impressive achievement", but the political, economic and social divisions that developed within the Islamic community during his reign "was to prove something of a difficult inheritance for the later Umayyads".[77]

Institution of Islamic currency and Arabization of the bureaucracy edit

 
A gold dinar of Abd al-Malik minted in 698/99. Abd al-Malik introduced an independent Islamic currency in 693, which initially bore depictions of the caliph before being abandoned for coins solely containing inscriptions

A major part of Abd al-Malik's centralization and Islamization measures was the formation of an Islamic currency, with standard weight and design.[52][26] The Byzantine gold solidus was discontinued in Syria and Egypt,[26][45] the likely impetus being the Byzantines' addition of an image of Christ on their coins in 691/92, which violated Muslim prohibitions on images of prophets.[78] To replace the Byzantine coins, he introduced an Islamic gold currency, the dinar, in 693.[45][79] Initially, the new coinage contained depictions of the caliph as the spiritual leader of the Muslim community and its supreme military commander.[26] This image proved no less acceptable to Muslim officialdom and was replaced in 696 or 697 with image-less coinage inscribed with Qur'anic quotes and other Muslim religious formulas.[79] In 698/99, similar changes were made to the silver dirhams issued by the Muslims in the former Sasanian Persian lands in the eastern Caliphate.[78] Depictions of the Sasanian king were consequently removed from the coinage,[78] though Abd al-Malik's new dirham retained its characteristically Sasanian silver fabric and wide flan.[80]

Shortly after the overhaul of the Caliphate's currency, in circa 700, Abd al-Malik is generally credited to have decreed the replacement of Greek with Arabic as the language of the dīwān (bureaucracy) in Syria.[79][81][82] The transition was carried out by his scribe Sulayman ibn Sa'd.[83] Al-Hajjaj had initiated the Arabization of the Persian dīwān in Iraq, three years prior.[82] Though the official language was changed, Greek and Persian-speaking bureaucrats who were versed in Arabic kept their posts.[84] The Arabization of the bureaucracy and currency was the most consequential administrative reform undertaken by the caliph.[45] Arabic ultimately became the sole official language of the Umayyad state,[78] but the transition in faraway provinces, such as Khurasan, did not occur until the 740s.[85] According to Gibb, the decree was the "first step towards the reorganization and unification of the diverse tax-systems in the provinces, and also a step towards a more definitely Muslim administration".[45] Indeed, it formed an important part of the Islamization measures that lent the Umayyad Caliphate "a more ideological and programmatic coloring it had previously lacked", according to Blankinship.[86] In tandem, Abd al-Malik began the export of papyri containing the Muslim statement of belief in Greek to spread Islamic teachings in the Byzantine realm.[78] This was a further testament to the ideological expansion of the Byzantine–Muslim struggle.[78]

The increasingly Muslim character of the state under Abd al-Malik was partly a reflection of Islam's influence in the lives of the caliph and the chief enforcer of his policies, al-Hajjaj, both of whom belonged to the first generation of rulers born and raised as Muslims.[45] Having spent most of their lives in the Hejaz, the theological and legal center of Islam where Arabic was spoken exclusively and administrative offices were held solely by Arab Muslims, Abd al-Malik and his viceroy only understood Arabic and were unfamiliar with the Syrian and Greek Christian and Persian Zoroastrian officials of the dīwān.[87] They stood in stark contrast to the Sufyanid caliphs and their governors in Iraq, who had entered these regions as youths and whose children were as acquainted with the native majority as with the Arab Muslim newcomers.[87] According to Wellhausen, Abd al-Malik was careful not to offend his pious subjects "in the careless fashion of [Caliph] Yazid", but from the time of his accession "he subordinated everything to policy, and even exposed the Ka'ba to the danger of destruction", despite the piety of his upbringing and early career.[8] Dixon challenges this view, opining that the Abbasid-era Muslim sources' portrayal of Abd al-Malik undergoing a radical change in character upon his accession and consequently abandoning his previously well-established piety was the result of their general hostility to Abd al-Malik, whom they variously "accused of being a mean, treacherous and blood-thirsty person".[13] Dixon, nonetheless, concedes that the caliph disregarded his early Muslim ideals when he felt political circumstances necessitated it.[13]

Reorganization of the army edit

Abd al-Malik shifted away from his predecessors' utilization of Arab tribal masses in favor of an organized army.[71][88] Likewise, Arab noblemen who had derived their power solely through their tribal standing and personal relations with a caliph were gradually replaced with military men who had risen through the ranks.[71][88] These developments have been partially obscured by the medieval sources due to their continued usage of Arab tribal terminology when referencing the army, such as the names of the tribal confederations Mudar, Rabi'a, Qays and Yaman.[71] According to Hawting, these do not represent the "tribes in arms" utilized by earlier caliphs; rather, they denote army factions whose membership was often (but not exclusively) determined by tribal origin.[71]

Under Abd al-Malik, loyalist Syrian troops began to be deployed throughout the Caliphate to keep order, which came largely at the expense of the tribal nobility of Iraq.[71] The latter's revolt under Ibn al-Ash'ath demonstrated to Abd al-Malik the unreliability of the Iraqi muqātila in securing the central government's interests in the province and its eastern dependencies.[71] It was following the revolt's suppression that the military became primarily composed of the Syrian army.[49] Consecrating this transformation was a fundamental change to the system of military pay, whereby salaries were restricted to those in active service. This marked an end to the system established by Caliph Umar (r. 634–644), which paid stipends to veterans of the earlier Muslim conquests and their descendants.[49] While the Iraqi tribal nobility viewed the stipends as their traditional right, al-Hajjaj viewed them as a handicap restricting his and Abd al-Malik's executive authority and financial ability to reward loyalists in the army.[49] Stipends were similarly stopped to the inhabitants of the Hejaz, including the Quraysh.[89] Thus, a professional army was established during Abd al-Malik's reign whose salaries derived from tax proceeds.[49] The dependence on the Syrian army by his successors, culminating under Hisham (r. 724–743), saw the army's scattering between the Caliphate's multiple and isolated war fronts, most of them distant from Syria.[90] The growing strain and heavy losses inflicted on the Syrians by the Caliphate's external enemies "led to the weakening and downfall of the Umayyads" in 750.[90]

Foundation of the Dome of the Rock edit

 
The Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem was founded by Abd al-Malik in 691/92

Shortly after becoming caliph, in 685/86 or 688, Abd al-Malik initiated construction plans for the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem.[91] Its dedication inscription mentions the year 691/92, which most scholars agree is the completion date of the building.[92][93] It is the earliest archaeologically-attested religious structure to be built by a Muslim ruler and the building's inscriptions contain the earliest epigraphic proclamations of Islam and of the prophet Muhammad.[94] The inscriptions proved to be a milestone, as afterward they became a common feature in Islamic structures and almost always mention Muhammad.[94] The Dome of the Rock remains a "unique monument of Islamic culture in almost all respects", including as a "work of art and as a cultural and pious document", according to historian Oleg Grabar.[95]

Accounts by the medieval sources differ in deciphering Abd al-Malik's motivations to build the Dome of the Rock.[95] At the time of its construction, the caliph was engaged in war with Christian Byzantium and its Syrian Christian allies on the one hand and with the rival caliph Ibn al-Zubayr, who controlled Mecca, the annual destination of Muslim pilgrimage, on the other hand.[95][96] Thus, one series of explanations was that Abd al-Malik intended for the Dome of the Rock to be a religious monument of victory over the Christians that would distinguish Islam's uniqueness within the common Abrahamic religious setting of Jerusalem, home of the two older Abrahamic faiths, Judaism and Christianity.[95][97] The other main explanation holds that Abd al-Malik, in the heat of the war with Ibn al-Zubayr, sought to build the structure to divert the focus of the Muslims in his realm from the Ka'aba in Mecca, where Ibn al-Zubayr would publicly condemn the Umayyads during the annual pilgrimage to the sanctuary.[95][96][97] Though most modern historians dismiss the latter account as a product of anti-Umayyad propaganda in the traditional Muslim sources and doubt that Abd al-Malik would attempt to alter the sacred Muslim requirement of fulfilling the pilgrimage to the Ka'aba, other historians concede that this cannot be conclusively dismissed.[95][96][97]

  • Rabbat, Nasser (1993). "The Dome of the Rock Revisited: Some Remarks on al-Wasiti's Accounts". Muqarnas. 10: 66–75. doi:10.2307/1523173. JSTOR 1523173.

While his sons commissioned numerous architectural works, Abd al-Malik's known building activities were limited to Jerusalem.[98] In addition to the Dome of the Rock, he is credited for expanding the boundaries of the Temple Mount (Haram al-Sharif) to include the Foundation Stone around which the dome was built, building two gates of the Temple Mount (possibly the Mercy Gate and the Prophet's Gate) and repairing the city's streets.[98][99] Theophanes, possibly conserving an original Syro-Palestinian Melkite source, reports that Abd al-Malik sought to remove some columns from a Christian shrine at Gethsemane to rebuild the Ka'aba, but that he was dissuaded by his Christian treasurer, Sarjun ibn Mansur (the father of John of Damascus), and another leading Christian, called Patrikios, from Palestine, who successfully petitioned Emperor Justinian II to supply other columns instead.[100][101] Abd al-Malik also repaired and built roads connecting Damascus with Palestine, as evidenced by seven milestones found in different locations in the region, the oldest of which dates to May 692 and the latest to September 704.[102][103][note 2]

Family and residences edit

Abd al-Malik had a number of children from several wives and slave women. He was married to Wallada bint al-Abbas ibn al-Jaz, a fourth-generation descendant of the prominent Banu Abs chieftain Zuhayr ibn Jadhima.[105] She bore Abd al-Malik sons al-Walid I, Sulayman, Marwan al-Akbar and a daughter, A'isha.[105] He also married Atika, a daughter of Yazid, who bore them sons Yazid II, Marwan, Mu'awiya and a daughter, Umm Kulthum.[105][70] Another of his wives, A'isha bint Hisham ibn Isma'il, belonged to the Banu Makhzum clan and mothered Abd al-Malik's son Hisham.[105] From his marriage to Umm Ayyub bint Amr, a granddaughter of Caliph Uthman, Abd al-Malik had his son al-Hakam, who apparently died at a young age.[105][106] Abd al-Malik also married A'isha bint Musa, a granddaughter of Talha ibn Ubaydallah and together they had a son, Bakkar, who was also known as Abu Bakr.[105][107] From one of his wives, Umm al-Mughira bint al-Mughira ibn Khalid, Abd al-Malik had his daughter Fatima, who would later wed his nephew and future caliph Umar II.[105] Abd al-Malik also married and divorced a Umm Abiha bint Abd Allah, a granddaughter of Ja'far ibn Ali,[105][108] and Shaqra bint Salama ibn Halbas, a woman of the Banu Tayy tribe.[105] Abd al-Malik's sons from his slave women, collectively referred to as ummahāt awlad (sing. umm walad), were Abd Allah, Maslama, al-Mundhir, Anbasa, Muhammad, Sa'id al-Khayr and al-Hajjaj.[105] By the time of his death, fourteen of Abd al-Malik's sons had survived him, according to al-Yaqubi.[64]

Abd al-Malik divided his time between Damascus and a number of seasonal residences in its general vicinity.[109][110] According to medieval and modern-day sources, he spent the winter months mostly in Damascus and al-Sinnabra near Lake Tiberias, then to Jabiya in the Golan Heights and Dayr Murran, a monastery village on the slopes of Mount Qasyun overlooking the Ghuta orchards of Damascus.[109][110] He would typically return to the city in March and leave again in the heat of summer to Ba'albak in the Biqa'a Valley before heading back to Damascus in early autumn.[109][110]

Notes edit

  1. ^ The Yamani Banu Kalb under Humayd ibn Hurayth ibn Bahdal attacked the Qaysi Banu Fazara in the Hejaz not long after Abd al-Malik and Zufar ibn al-Harith al-Kilabi's reconciliation in 691. Abd al-Malik compensated them with blood money, but refused to punish the Kalb. When the Fazara used the money to acquire arms and launch a raid against the Kalb at Banat Qayn in the Syrian Desert in 692–694, two of the Fazari chieftains offered themselves for execution by the Kalbi nobles in Abd al-Malik's court to spare their tribesmen from the caliph's threatened punitive measures. Abd al-Malik accepted and threatened the unsatisfied Kalbi chiefs that "he would kill as many of them as they killed" of the Qays. The incident at Banat Qayn was the last of the major Kalbi–Qaysi raids.[59] The feud between the Qays and the Banu Taghlib continued through the 690s, culminating with a massacre of the Taghlib at a place called al-Bishr by the Qaysi chieftain al-Jahhaf ibn Hukaym of the Banu Sulaym. Abd al-Malik put a definitive end to their feud by forcing the Sulaym to financially compensate the Taghlib, and instructing his son al-Walid I, whose mother was a Qaysi, to compensate both tribes for the casualties they had inflicted on each other prior to al-Bishr.[60]
  2. ^ The milestones, all containing inscriptions crediting Abd al-Malik for the road works, were found, from north to south, in or near Fiq, Samakh, St. George's Monastery of Wadi Qelt, Khan al-Hathrura, Abu Ghosh and Bab al-Wad. The milestone found in Samakh dates to 692, the two milestones at Fiq both date to 704 and the remaining milestones are undated.[104]

References edit

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kennedy 2016, p. 80.
  2. ^ Dixon 1971, p. 15.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Gibb 1960, p. 76.
  4. ^ a b Ahmed 2010, p. 111.
  5. ^ Della Vida 2000, p. 838.
  6. ^ Donner 1981, pp. 77–78.
  7. ^ a b Dixon 1971, p. 20.
  8. ^ a b c Wellhausen 1927, p. 215.
  9. ^ Dixon 1971, p. 16.
  10. ^ Dixon 1971, p. 17.
  11. ^ Kennedy 2016, pp. 78–79.
  12. ^ a b c d e f Kennedy 2016, p. 79.
  13. ^ a b c Dixon 1971, p. 21.
  14. ^ Crone 1980, pp. 100, 125.
  15. ^ a b Elad 1999, p. 24.
  16. ^ a b Dixon 1971, p. 18.
  17. ^ a b c d e Hawting 2000, p. 59.
  18. ^ Hawting 2000, pp. 58–59.
  19. ^ a b c d e f Kennedy 2016, p. 81.
  20. ^ a b c d e Wellhausen 1927, p. 222.
  21. ^ a b Kennedy 2001, p. 35.
  22. ^ a b c d Kennedy 2001, p. 32.
  23. ^ Kennedy 2016, pp. 80–81.
  24. ^ a b c d e f g Kennedy 2001, p. 33.
  25. ^ Wellhausen 1927, p. 204.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h Blankinship 1994, p. 28.
  27. ^ a b Blankinship 1994, p. 27–28.
  28. ^ Dixon 1971, pp. 92–93.
  29. ^ a b c d Kennedy 2016, p. 84.
  30. ^ Dixon 1971, p. 93.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kennedy 2016, p. 87.
  32. ^ Kennedy 2016, p. 86—87.
  33. ^ Fishbein 1990, p. 181.
  34. ^ Wellhausen 1927, pp. 195–196.
  35. ^ a b c Wellhausen 1927, p. 197.
  36. ^ a b c d e f Dietrich 1971, p. 40.
  37. ^ a b Wellhausen 1927, p. 198.
  38. ^ a b c d Hawting 2000, p. 58.
  39. ^ a b c Wellhausen 1927, p. 199.
  40. ^ Wellhausen 1927, p. 200.
  41. ^ Dixon 1971, p. 140.
  42. ^ a b c Ahmed 2010, p. 152.
  43. ^ a b Wellhausen 1927, p. 227.
  44. ^ Wellhausen 1927, p. 229.
  45. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Gibb 1960, p. 77.
  46. ^ Wellhausen 1927, pp. 228–229.
  47. ^ Kennedy 2001, pp. 33–34.
  48. ^ a b c Wellhausen 1927, p. 231.
  49. ^ a b c d e f Kennedy 2016, p. 89.
  50. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kennedy 2016, p. 88.
  51. ^ a b c d Kennedy 2001, p. 34.
  52. ^ a b c d e f Kennedy 2016, p. 85.
  53. ^ a b Zetterstéen 1993, p. 408.
  54. ^ Blankinship 1994, p. 31.
  55. ^ Wellhausen 1927, pp. 216–217, 222.
  56. ^ a b c d e Talbi 1971, p. 271.
  57. ^ Lévi-Provençal 1993, p. 643.
  58. ^ a b Dixon 1971, p. 120.
  59. ^ Dixon 1971, pp. 96–98.
  60. ^ Dixon 1971, pp. 103–104.
  61. ^ Becker 1960, p. 42.
  62. ^ Hinds 1990, pp. 125–126.
  63. ^ a b Wellhausen 1927, p. 223.
  64. ^ a b Biesterfeldt & Günther 2018, p. 986.
  65. ^ Kennedy 2002, p. 127.
  66. ^ Dixon 1971, p. 198.
  67. ^ a b Robinson 2005, p. 124.
  68. ^ Wellhausen 1927, pp. 221–222.
  69. ^ Bacharach 1996, p. 30.
  70. ^ a b Ahmed 2010, p. 118.
  71. ^ a b c d e f g Hawting 2000, p. 62.
  72. ^ Blankinship 1994, p. 78.
  73. ^ Wellhausen 1927, pp. 220–221.
  74. ^ Wellhausen 1927, p. 221.
  75. ^ Kennedy 2016, pp. 72, 76, 85.
  76. ^ Hawting 2000, p. 64.
  77. ^ Kennedy 2016, p. 90.
  78. ^ a b c d e f Blankinship 1994, p. 94.
  79. ^ a b c Blankinship 1994, pp. 28, 94.
  80. ^ Darley & Canepa 2018, p. 367.
  81. ^ Hawting 2000, p. 63.
  82. ^ a b Duri 1965, p. 324.
  83. ^ Sprengling 1939, pp. 212–213.
  84. ^ Wellhausen 1927, pp. 219–220.
  85. ^ Hawting 2000, pp. 63–64.
  86. ^ Blankinship 1994, p. 95.
  87. ^ a b Sprengling 1939, pp. 193–195.
  88. ^ a b Robinson 2005, p. 68.
  89. ^ Elad 2016, p. 331.
  90. ^ a b Blankinship 1994, p. 236.
  91. ^ Elad 1999, pp. 24, 44.
  92. ^ Johns 2003, pp. 424–426.
  93. ^ Elad 1999, p. 45.
  94. ^ a b Johns 2003, p. 416.
  95. ^ a b c d e f Grabar 1986, p. 299.
  96. ^ a b c Johns 2003, pp. 425–426.
  97. ^ a b c Hawting 2000, p. 60.
  98. ^ a b Bacharach 1996, p. 28.
  99. ^ Elad 1999, pp. 25–26.
  100. ^ PmbZ, 'Abd al-Malik (#18/corr.).
  101. ^ Mango & Scott 1997, p. 510, note 5.
  102. ^ Sharon 1966, pp. 368, 370–372.
  103. ^ Sharon 2004, p. 95.
  104. ^ Sharon 2004, pp. 94–96.
  105. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Hinds 1990, p. 118.
  106. ^ Ahmed 2010, p. 116.
  107. ^ Ahmed 2010, p. 160.
  108. ^ Ahmed 2010, p. 128.
  109. ^ a b c Kennedy 2016, p. 96.
  110. ^ a b c Bacharach 1996, p. 38.

Bibliography edit

Al Ameer son/Abd al-Malik
Born: 646/47 Died: 9 October 705
Preceded by Caliph of Islam
Umayyad Caliph

12 April 685 – 9 October 705
Succeeded by


Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).