This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete this page and all the other Foley dab pages recently created in lieu of the "name" page being a dabpage: see History on Foley (surname), which I reverted once, but did not do so again when the otehr editor reverted me. This applies to Thomas Foley and several more. This seems to have arisen as a result of an officious trying to apply rules inappropriately. When there is no Primary Subject, it is (or should be) acceptable for the main page to be a dab page. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support, or maybe fix as Peter describes if that's better. But the nom should also express a willingness to go through and fix the 14 or so linguistic articles that treat the linguist as primarytopic for William Foley, else their links will be broken. Dicklyon (talk) 00:50, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support as there does not appear to be a primary topic. I don't understand what Peterkingiron is proposing, but an examination of the edit history at Foley (surname) suggests he may be confused. older ≠ wiser20:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
